What "Change"? (Not an Obama bashing thread) (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


FirmhandKY -> What "Change"? (Not an Obama bashing thread) (4/4/2009 4:47:45 PM)


The intent of this post and thread is not to bash Obama, but to discuss the concept of the promised "change".

My question is ... what "change"?

Oh, sure, we've traded out some people in positions of power, and some polices may change in the margins .... but so far, it doesn't look to me as there are any substantial changes in direction ... just changes in emphasis.

For example, the bailouts (with which I generally disagree with) started under the last Republican administration and continue in the current Democratic administration - only more so.

No basic change in policy here.

The Global War on Terror?

The name has changed, but most of the polices and objectives seem to remain.

The ability of the US to get it's way with it's European allies?

Barack Obama fails to win Nato troops:
Barack Obama made an impassioned plea to America’s allies to send more troops to Afghanistan, warning that failure to do so would leave Europe vulnerable to more terrorist atrocities.

But though he continued to dazzle Europeans on his debut international tour, the Continent’s leaders turned their backs on the US President.

Not much change there, it seems.

Change in the way that politics and justice mix?  Seems like Holder can mouth the words, but has already shown that politics will be part of the current Justice Department.

An executive who talks almost incoherently at times?  Had that the last Administration.  Seem to have it in this Administration:

The question that flummoxed the great orator


(I think it likely that we'll soon have websites devoted to "Obama-isms" much like we had for "Bush-isms".)

I know that in politics, as in religion, we often perceive things depending on where our beliefs are.  In political theory, this is called "where you stand depends on where you sit".  In other words, if you are generally favorable to one point of view, then you'll tend to view most actions and beliefs of others who share your basic viewpoint in a positive light, and vice versa.

I'm generally a conservative (or classical liberal) person in my beliefs, and supported the previous Administration on security issues.  Yeah, I didn't like everything, but at the end of the day, I gave the benefit of the doubt to the party in charge on the issues.

I wasn't happy with a lot of things: No Child Left Behind, Budget busting spending, increased spending and government intrusion, the new bankruptcy law, and lots of other things.

With the new Administration, I don't see a lot of substantial differences in policies, or the changes I do see seem to be (as I said) of emphasis and the speed in which we as a nation are traveling down a certain path.

Am I wrong?

Please ... leave your partisan bickering at home ... I know that Bush was Hitler, and Obama is "the One" ... but I'm more interested in discussing whether or not there really can be any substantive differences in the path that we seem to going as a society, and as a government.

And whether or not it's a path we really want to travel.

Firm




TheHeretic -> RE: What "Change"? (Not an Obama bashing thread) (4/4/2009 5:03:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY
An executive who talks almost incoherently at times?  Had that the last Administration.  Seem to have it in this Administration:

The question that flummoxed the great orator





        Answering with a non-answer is a vital skill in politics, Firm.  I enjoyed the heck out of the little fillers though.  He juggled a loaded question well enough.

       To your question, the 'change' is from one set of idiots who thought they had it all figured out, to another.  That, or it's what I'll likely have less of to throw in the coffee can for the next trip to Vegas.

     (I think we missed you in Vegas.  Damn.  We even wandered through Paris one night.)




FullCircle -> RE: What "Change"? (Not an Obama bashing thread) (4/4/2009 5:19:08 PM)

Would hate to see what a non Obama bashing op would look like.
 
The biggest change is the tone.
 
No more rendition, no more cuban holiday camps, the realisation that war fought against sporadic groups can't be done solely via military options.
 
No you are right nothing at all has change in this short space of time.




slvemike4u -> RE: What "Change"? (Not an Obama bashing thread) (4/4/2009 5:21:46 PM)

Let's not forget we now have a guy that actually understands what the rest of the worlds leaders are talking about.....no more waiting for the Cheney translation.




Lucylastic -> RE: What "Change"? (Not an Obama bashing thread) (4/4/2009 5:25:19 PM)

I love the squealing and indignance of the repubs....change I can believe in....
Lucy





CruelNUnsual -> RE: What "Change"? (Not an Obama bashing thread) (4/4/2009 5:27:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FullCircle

Would hate to see what a non Obama bashing op would look like.
 
The biggest change is the tone.
 
No more rendition, no more cuban holiday camps, the realisation that war fought against sporadic groups can't be done solely via military options.
 
No you are right nothing at all has change in this short space of time.



Rendition is alive and well it will just be done more covertly, the cuban holiday camp will just be relocated...maybe to a prison near you, and the only "realization" is return to the mistaken belief that "Overseas Contingency Operations" can be thwarted WITHOUT military options.




MarsBonfire -> RE: What "Change"? (Not an Obama bashing thread) (4/4/2009 5:32:21 PM)

We're out of Iraq in 15 months. Only slightly longer than promised.

The tax rate on the wealthiset of Americans is going up, while I, earning under $50k a year, am now getting an extra $40 bucks a paycheck.

Stem cell research is back.

Gitmo is being closed.

Torture is now banned, as it alwasy should have been, according to the Constitution.

Money is being put back into infrastructure, instead of Halliburton. Maybe we won't have more bridges falling down.

Our ability to work with the EU and other countries is being restored.

Although it hasn't happened yet, there is a storong chance that balance will be restored to the Supreme Court.

The American auto industry is getting a swift kick in it's balls, and will soon be in the hands of CEOs who will listen to the fucking market demands.

The days of "predatory lending and investing are over... or will be over soon. Within a short time, the market will be restored... like a great ship having the barnacles scraped from it's hull.

And personally, I LIKE having a President that I can be proud of. One that can string two sentances together. Who can go to an EU conference and NOT yell across the room at the Spanish representative: "Hey! Amigo! Que Pasa?" or try to give the chancellor of Germany a backrub. Or be caught on camera saying things like "Well, if fucking Hezbolla would just stop it with this shit...." One that can ride a SegWay without falling on his ass (which is supposed to be almost impossible to do). One that won't sit on his ass for 7 minutes while the country is being attacked, or a city is drowning. One that isn't an ex-coke head, drunkard, member of the Skull and Bones. One that in all likelihood isn't going to take us to war without a fucking good reason, or to a war based on a lie about yellowcake urainium from Niger. One that won't "out" a CIA operative as punishment for their husband whistleblowing on that lie. One that doesn't swiftboat 12 years olds and their families because they spoke up about how a government program helped them through a near disaster. One that doesn't suck up to the religious right with a bottle of Scope and a pair of kneepads. One that doesn't give away a budget surplus, then ram the country into debt with China, all to grease the palms of his fat cat buddies, and  to finance his little Iraq Adventure.

I like having a REAL President, thanks. Not some half assed cartoon of one played by a guy from New Engalnd who just likes faking a TX accent. 

I'm sorry you don't see the change. I guess the next four to eight years is really, really gonna be difficult for you, as you watch the US and the world recover and prosper under this new administration.




FullCircle -> RE: What "Change"? (Not an Obama bashing thread) (4/4/2009 5:34:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CruelNUnsual
Rendition is alive and well it will just be done more covertly, the cuban holiday camp will just be relocated...maybe to a prison near you, and the only "realization" is return to the mistaken belief that "Overseas Contingency Operations" can be thwarted WITHOUT military options.

If that is the case sooner or later it will come to light (it always does, we didn't used to know it happened at all), I have faith in Obama's word that it will end because his integrity hasn't been brought into question by myself yet.
 
Still using a sledge hammer to crack chestnut? That is what the military is and it will solve no insurgency of any kind the odds are always against the ones that walk about in uniforms waiting to be shot at from the shadows. 




Owner59 -> RE: What "Change"? (Not an Obama bashing thread) (4/4/2009 5:38:03 PM)

If there weren`t changes going on,real ones,republicans wouldn`t be sooo,....mmmm....discomforted.

I feel the discomfiture..it`s a great barometer of change.




MarsBonfire -> RE: What "Change"? (Not an Obama bashing thread) (4/4/2009 5:39:23 PM)

Oh, and hey... that's just in the first couple of months! Imagine how much change will take place by the end of the first year! Whoooo Hooooo! :)




FirmhandKY -> RE: What "Change"? (Not an Obama bashing thread) (4/4/2009 5:39:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FullCircle

Would hate to see what a non Obama bashing op would look like.

Your apparent conclusion that it was "Obama bashing" is because you have invested into Obama, and is not based on the facts, I would submit.

quote:

ORIGINAL: FullCircle

The biggest change is the tone.

So you agree that it's not a substantive change?

quote:

ORIGINAL: FullCircle
 
No more rendition, no more cuban holiday camps, the realisation that war fought against sporadic groups can't be done solely via military options.
 
No you are right nothing at all has change in this short space of time.


No more rendition? 
Obama preserves renditions as counter-terrorism tool

no more cuban holiday camps
Well, it's kinda still open ya know.  As well .... Secret List of U.S. Military Bases to Replace Gitmo.

the realisation that war fought against sporadic groups can't be done solely via military options.

Like invading Pakistan? Like increasing our Afghanistan troop levels?  Like asking Europe for more soldiers to assist us?

No, the previous Administration never did anything but use force, either?  You wanna Google that, maybe?

You really didn't say or do anything other than prove my point that "where you stand depends on where you sit."

You are answering questions I'm not asking, Circle.

Firm




CruelNUnsual -> RE: What "Change"? (Not an Obama bashing thread) (4/4/2009 5:44:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MarsBonfire

We're out of Iraq in 15 months. Only slightly longer than promised.    which was already underway under GWB

The tax rate on the wealthiset of Americans is going up, while I, earning under $50k a year, am now getting an extra $40 bucks a paycheck. Dont spend it all in one place..in fact you better save it, because when jobs disappear because investment dries up you just may need it.

Stem cell research is back. It never went anywhere

Gitmo is being closed.    its being relocated, if that

Torture is now banned, as it alwasy should have been, according to the Constitution. it was banned before, it just depends on your definition of torture

Money is being put back into infrastructure, instead of Halliburton. Maybe we won't have more bridges falling down.  Dont count on it

Our ability to work with the EU and other countries is being restored. If by "work with" you mean kowtow and give up US soverignty youre right..that is one change that is evolving

Although it hasn't happened yet, there is a storong chance that balance will be restored to the Supreme Court. If by "balance" you mean reinterpretation of the Constitution to fit better modern European socialism you may have a second one right

The American auto industry is getting a swift kick in it's balls, and will soon be in the hands of CEOs who will listen to the fucking market demands. Whether it is or isnt, Washington won't be the place that made it happen

The days of "predatory lending and investing are over... or will be over soon. Within a short time, the market will be restored... like a great ship having the barnacles scraped from it's hull. As long as Chris Dodd,Barney Frank, Franklin Raines and Tim Geithner are around, dont expect anything to happen.

And personally, I LIKE having a President that I can be proud of. One that can string two sentances together. Who can go to an EU conference and NOT yell across the room at the Spanish representative: "Hey! Amigo! Que Pasa?" or try to give the chancellor of Germany a backrub. Or be caught on camera saying things like "Well, if fucking Hezbolla would just stop it with this shit...." One that can ride a SegWay without falling on his ass (which is supposed to be almost impossible to do). One that won't sit on his ass for 7 minutes while the country is being attacked, or a city is drowning. One that isn't an ex-coke head, drunkard, member of the Skull and Bones. One that in all likelihood isn't going to take us to war without a fucking good reason, or to a war based on a lie about yellowcake urainium from Niger. One that won't "out" a CIA operative as punishment for their husband whistleblowing on that lie. One that doesn't swiftboat 12 years olds and their families because they spoke up about how a government program helped them through a near disaster. One that doesn't suck up to the religious right with a bottle of Scope and a pair of kneepads. One that doesn't give away a budget surplus, then ram the country into debt with China, all to grease the palms of his fat cat buddies, and  to finance his little Iraq Adventure. This is too childish a rant to even respond to.

I like having a REAL President, thanks. Not some half assed cartoon of one played by a guy from New Engalnd who just likes faking a TX accent. yes, the person sitting there has change and we will be far worse off for it.

I'm sorry you don't see the change. I guess the next four to eight years is really, really gonna be difficult for you, as you watch the US and the world recover and prosper under this new administration.  Save your $40s my friend, if the Dems don't lose seatsin 2010 and the Presidency in 2012 youre in for at least 15 years of one economic crisis after another. Carter and Ford years will look like walks in the park




FirmhandKY -> RE: What "Change"? (Not an Obama bashing thread) (4/4/2009 5:47:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

      To your question, the 'change' is from one set of idiots who thought they had it all figured out, to another.

I think this is where my head is as well, and I don't particularly like it.

My concern is that we are going down a path that will end up in tryanny sooner or later, and the only difference between the parties is the structure of the actual authoritarian state.

A little overstated perhaps, but valid, I believe.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

    (I think we missed you in Vegas.  Damn.  We even wandered through Paris one night.)

Damn.  I didn't know you were there.  Next time, cmail me, and I'll send you my cell.

Firm




FirmhandKY -> RE: What "Change"? (Not an Obama bashing thread) (4/4/2009 5:52:06 PM)


I reiterate:

Please ... leave your partisan bickering at home ... I know that Bush was Hitler, and Obama is "the One" ... but I'm more interested in discussing whether or not there really can be any substantive differences in the path that we seem to going as a society, and as a government.

And whether or not it's a path we really want to travel.


Firm




CruelNUnsual -> RE: What "Change"? (Not an Obama bashing thread) (4/4/2009 5:55:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY


I reiterate:

Please ... leave your partisan bickering at home ... I know that Bush was Hitler, and Obama is "the One" ... but I'm more interested in discussing whether or not there really can be any substantive differences in the path that we seem to going as a society, and as a government.

And whether or not it's a path we really want to travel.


Firm


No. (to both of your questions) </thread>  [:D]




FirmhandKY -> RE: What "Change"? (Not an Obama bashing thread) (4/4/2009 6:02:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CruelNUnsual

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY


I reiterate:

Please ... leave your partisan bickering at home ... I know that Bush was Hitler, and Obama is "the One" ... but I'm more interested in discussing whether or not there really can be any substantive differences in the path that we seem to going as a society, and as a government.

And whether or not it's a path we really want to travel.


Firm


No. (to both of your questions) </thread>  [:D]

Fair enough answer, but it leaves me a little ... empty. [:D]

If there can't, or won't be any substantive changes ... what the hell are we arguing about among ourselves?

Firm




philosophy -> RE: What "Change"? (Not an Obama bashing thread) (4/4/2009 6:38:02 PM)

FR

.....substantive change does not necessarily imply blatant or unsubtle change. Nor does it have to be quick.

A change of tone in diplomatic signals is actually quite a substantive thing. Diplomacy and foreign policy is a subtle art, Obama appears to understand that.......medium/long term i think it'll make a huge difference.




Raiikun -> RE: What "Change"? (Not an Obama bashing thread) (4/4/2009 6:42:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MarsBonfire

We're out of Iraq in 15 months. Only slightly longer than promised.


With a sizable force remaining after 15 months.


quote:

The tax rate on the wealthiset of Americans is going up, while I, earning under $50k a year, am now getting an extra $40 bucks a paycheck


Which may very well lead to less overall revenue, as there are already wealthy people leaving the country. 

quote:

Stem cell research is back.


It was never gone.

quote:

Gitmo is being closed.


We'll see.  Barack mentioned some pretty big "ifs" that would have to be met before it was closed.

quote:

Torture is now banned, as it alwasy should have been, according to the Constitution.


To be replaced with other breaches of the Constitution.  (I wonder if everyone claiming that Bush needs to be put on trial for allegedly ignoring the Constitution are also calling for the heads of the hundreds of Congresspeople that voted "yes" on a Bill of Attainder which is also forbidden in the Constitution.)




Lorr47 -> RE: What "Change"? (Not an Obama bashing thread) (4/4/2009 6:43:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CruelNUnsual

quote:

ORIGINAL: MarsBonfire

We're out of Iraq in 15 months. Only slightly longer than promised.    which was already underway under GWB

The tax rate on the wealthiset of Americans is going up, while I, earning under $50k a year, am now getting an extra $40 bucks a paycheck. Dont spend it all in one place..in fact you better save it, because when jobs disappear because investment dries up you just may need it.

Stem cell research is back. It never went anywhere

Gitmo is being closed.    its being relocated, if that

Torture is now banned, as it alwasy should have been, according to the Constitution. it was banned before, it just depends on your definition of torture

Money is being put back into infrastructure, instead of Halliburton. Maybe we won't have more bridges falling down.  Dont count on it

Our ability to work with the EU and other countries is being restored. If by "work with" you mean kowtow and give up US soverignty youre right..that is one change that is evolving

Although it hasn't happened yet, there is a storong chance that balance will be restored to the Supreme Court. If by "balance" you mean reinterpretation of the Constitution to fit better modern European socialism you may have a second one right

The American auto industry is getting a swift kick in it's balls, and will soon be in the hands of CEOs who will listen to the fucking market demands. Whether it is or isnt, Washington won't be the place that made it happen

The days of "predatory lending and investing are over... or will be over soon. Within a short time, the market will be restored... like a great ship having the barnacles scraped from it's hull. As long as Chris Dodd,Barney Frank, Franklin Raines and Tim Geithner are around, dont expect anything to happen.

And personally, I LIKE having a President that I can be proud of. One that can string two sentances together. Who can go to an EU conference and NOT yell across the room at the Spanish representative: "Hey! Amigo! Que Pasa?" or try to give the chancellor of Germany a backrub. Or be caught on camera saying things like "Well, if fucking Hezbolla would just stop it with this shit...." One that can ride a SegWay without falling on his ass (which is supposed to be almost impossible to do). One that won't sit on his ass for 7 minutes while the country is being attacked, or a city is drowning. One that isn't an ex-coke head, drunkard, member of the Skull and Bones. One that in all likelihood isn't going to take us to war without a fucking good reason, or to a war based on a lie about yellowcake urainium from Niger. One that won't "out" a CIA operative as punishment for their husband whistleblowing on that lie. One that doesn't swiftboat 12 years olds and their families because they spoke up about how a government program helped them through a near disaster. One that doesn't suck up to the religious right with a bottle of Scope and a pair of kneepads. One that doesn't give away a budget surplus, then ram the country into debt with China, all to grease the palms of his fat cat buddies, and  to finance his little Iraq Adventure. This is too childish a rant to even respond to.

I like having a REAL President, thanks. Not some half assed cartoon of one played by a guy from New Engalnd who just likes faking a TX accent. yes, the person sitting there has change and we will be far worse off for it.

I'm sorry you don't see the change. I guess the next four to eight years is really, really gonna be difficult for you, as you watch the US and the world recover and prosper under this new administration.  Save your $40s my friend, if the Dems don't lose seatsin 2010 and the Presidency in 2012 youre in for at least 15 years of one economic crisis after another. Carter and Ford years will look like walks in the park

ic

How about some links Celtic Lord.  Sorry to steal your line.




FirmhandKY -> RE: What "Change"? (Not an Obama bashing thread) (4/4/2009 6:46:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

FR

.....substantive change does not necessarily imply blatant or unsubtle change. Nor does it have to be quick.

A change of tone in diplomatic signals is actually quite a substantive thing. Diplomacy and foreign policy is a subtle art, Obama appears to understand that.......medium/long term i think it'll make a huge difference.

Thanks for the input, philo.

As you probably realize, I hew close to the "realist" school of international politics, which says that personalities may change, but national interest are pretty stable over time.

Has the US national interest changed, just because Obama is the President, and the Democratic Party is now in charge of our Legislative Branch?

Firm




Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875