RE: Mass killings and underlying reasons (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


philosophy -> RE: Mass killings and underlying reasons (4/11/2009 8:57:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

So you want to have a discussion about gun violence without discussing guns....except to euphemistically refer to them as "tools'.
Whats the point here....


(my italics)

...the point is, if guns were outlawed would US society be breeding occasions of mass killing by knife, or explosives, or poison? Is the apparent rise of mass killings in the US recently something to do with the US itself?
We don't know the answers to that, but we can speculate. That is the point. Glad i could clear that up.




slvemike4u -> RE: Mass killings and underlying reasons (4/11/2009 10:01:47 PM)

No Phil,you haven't cleared anything up...not in my mind anyway.Mass killing by knife?or explosives ?or Poison? Are these things currently happening.Of course not,what is happening is mass killings in which the "tool" used is a firearm.Now would it be useful to know what is driving these people to pick up a gun and kill untold numbers of their fellow citizens...Of course it would....But till we know more about what makes people do the things they do....lets look at the "tool" and the ease of acquiring said "tool".
And by the way referring to guns as the "tool" may make gun enthusiasts feel better about themselves,but part of my original objection to this thread is the intellectual dishonesty inherent in using such a euphemism....if we could do something constructive about the gun problem in this country and yet we still keep producing these nuts,at the least perhaps the body count will drop....a Knife being a far less effective "tool" when one is trying to murder in large numbers.




cpK69 -> RE: Mass killings and underlying reasons (4/11/2009 10:51:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: samboct

What is the relationship between serial killer and mucker?  Sam


The “mucker” does it because they believe the people involved are ‘wrong’. The serial killer does it because they believe they are ‘right’.
 
I still think it is not that difficult to understand, though fixing… let’s just say, I don’t think the human race is capable of doing it on their own.
 
The problem stems from greed and deceit, and ego, and you’ve got yourself one of those parties you don’t want to be the guest of honor at.

They are also the main ingredients in ‘Capitalist Incompetence’, perhaps even ‘Capitalism’ itself (I haven’t been able to form a concrete opinion in that area).

This is a ‘dog eat dog’ world, where the only way to ensure you stay on top, is to hinder those below you. Those who have no desire to be one of the 'dogs', tend not to fair to well here. The effect of this is catching up with us.

Some of the responses to this thread remind me of my thoughts toward the story of ‘The little boy who cried wolf’.
 
Why did the shepherds, continuously, leave the boy who lies, in charge of watching over the sheep? Where was the concern for the sheep?
Kim




cpK69 -> RE: Mass killings and underlying reasons (4/11/2009 11:05:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: MichiganHeadmast

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


The tool is the problem.





And it's typically the solution. 

Ahh,but absent the "problem"...no need for the "solution".Logic is a bitch isn't it.


Only if you think the problem is mass killings, and not killing itself.
 
I thought the thread was about causes people to go to such extremes, this seems more like; how do we encourage them to put more ingenuity into it.

Kim 




philosophy -> RE: Mass killings and underlying reasons (4/11/2009 11:14:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

....if we could do something constructive about the gun problem in this country and yet we still keep producing these nuts,at the least perhaps the body count will drop....


...and what if the hypothesis is correct and the gun is merely a tool being used by a hitherto unrecognised sector of US society?
The intellectual dishonesty you are displaying is the refusal to countenance any response to these events other than gun control. Perhaps, with gun control, the body count may drop......however, perhaps, if we identify and act on the underlying problem then the body count will drop much further.
So, what's your priority? Preventing future atrocity, or merely making sure they don't use guns?




slvemike4u -> RE: Mass killings and underlying reasons (4/11/2009 11:30:49 PM)

Preventing present atrocity seems a good place to start Philo...as good as any other.If that is intellectual dishonesty....I'm cool with it.




cpK69 -> RE: Mass killings and underlying reasons (4/11/2009 11:37:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Preventing present atrocity seems a good place to start Philo...as good as any other.If that is intellectual dishonesty....I'm cool with it.


You miseed... by a mile.
 
Kim




hopelessfool -> RE: Mass killings and underlying reasons (4/11/2009 11:50:50 PM)

May i ask a question.. didnt the Oklahoma bomber happen before Columbine? So wouldnt it make it wiser to first deal with bombs then it is with guns

personally i think the underlying cause is people dont care about anyone other then themselves any more. when a tragedy happens first we  make sure the people we know are safe. Then well if others die its okay it wasnt our loved ones.

We are so numb to people dying. And we always blame it on the person being insane or crazy or depressed.

I can tell you i dont honestly believe any of them are crazy or insane or depressed. I think they feel they are doing the right thing. How would you feel if you were told you were getting a d in a class because you turned your paper in late, but the rich white kid after you got an extension because he had baseball practice.

I grew up in a very very very small town, where the love of rock music, and the refusal of church made my principle ask me not to come to school after "violence" happened on school property else where. I was different so i was an outsider. I was a loner, In fact it was voted i would most likely blow up my school before i graduated. I did none of these things. I can freely admit i battle depression and i can admit i have thought of slicing a teachers throat on on occasion.  But Ive never even kicked a puppy.

I dont think the "tool" matters Be it guns a bomb a knife, a bow and arrow a cannon, a large singing off key man dressed in womans clothing... What matters is what causes these people to snap. If we didnt care so fucking much about being better then someone, about rushing in line at the grocery store, or not holding the door for someone behind us. or if we started to care about other people, I think crime in general would drop drastically.

Most people snap because they feel like whats the point of going on any more? Whats the point of caring about others they dont care about me, and since they dont care and they have caused these feelings THEY deserve to die now.

50 years ago, people knew their neigbors they watched their children, people held doors open for others. 50 years ago there werent NEARLY as many violent crimes as today and guess what Mike... THEY HAD GUNS AT THEIR DISPOSAL.

So you have to ask whats the difference between then and now, sure you could say well they have automatic guns now but the difference isnt the weapon or the ability of the weapon its the people. how many of you guys know your neighbors how many of you guys hold doors open for strangers or say thank you or are just in general nice to others. Its really sad when you see people be more kind to animals then they are their fellow humans

Just my jaded loner freak opinion... your insanity may vary
-K





philosophy -> RE: Mass killings and underlying reasons (4/11/2009 11:56:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: hopelessfool


So you have to ask whats the difference between then and now, sure you could say well they have automatic guns now but the difference isnt the weapon or the ability of the weapon its the people. how many of you guys know your neighbors how many of you guys hold doors open for strangers or say thank you or are just in general nice to others. Its really sad when you see people be more kind to animals then they are their fellow humans

Just my jaded loner freak opinion... your insanity may vary
-K




...you're not alone.




philosophy -> RE: Mass killings and underlying reasons (4/11/2009 11:57:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Preventing present atrocity seems a good place to start Philo...as good as any other.If that is intellectual dishonesty....I'm cool with it.


...good grief. You're not going to get into KittinSol's pants with an attitude like that.....




StrangerThan -> RE: Mass killings and underlying reasons (4/12/2009 6:24:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: hopelessfool

I can tell you i dont honestly believe any of them are crazy or insane or depressed. I think they feel they are doing the right thing.



I think that's the crux of the problem. I've been sitting here this morning sorting out these kinds of events in my mind and sifting them into different categories.

There's the attack against an entity type of killings - McVeigh, Unabomber, Eric Rudolph types. McVeigh cited Waco and Ruby Ridge as two of the reasons for the Oklahoma bombing. The Unabomber didn't like technological advancement or people in general. Eric Rudolph - at the time the hunt for him was going on, I lived less than an hour from the area where he disappeared. It was interesting to me that Rudolph had a lot of back-door sympathy from locals who felt he needed to be caught, but also were deeply distrustful of government. Many of those I talked to saw the hunt for him as evil vs evil, not as a good vs evil thing.

Couple of notes about these types. They're not expecting to die for the most part. It's not a final act of retribution in many of these cases. It is rather in their minds, almost a form of guerilla warfare. The breaking point isn't a specific group of people.

There's the Columbine type of killings - Columbine itself, McClendon in Alabama, that list can go on and on because there's been so many of them in the last few years. These target specific groups even though the result sometimes wanders outside of those groups in that innocent people are killed. I put that in italics for a reason. All of the victims can be considered innocent but not from the perspective of the perpetrator.  The perp had specific people or a specific group of people targeted.

I think these people expect to die. Escape isn't a big part of the plan. Killing as many as possible before they die themselves is. The breaking point among these people is driven by people, by supposed or real wrongs.

VA tech, the church shootings in Tennessee are a little different I think. These seem to wander back into the vague world of entity attacks as both went against something greater than just a list of people. The church shooter specifically wanted to kill Democrats. The VA tech killer might have had a list but once it began it was just a matter of getting as many as possible and seeing most everyone else as the rich, wealthy, priveleged.

Someone else can break it down further if they want. I'm tired this morning.

But here's the deal. I go along with you hopeless. I don't see any of them as insane. For whatever reason, they feel like they're doing the right thing, and in all cases, the actions were not spur of the moment outbursts but rather derived from thought that encompassed years.

Think of it this way, for every person who breaks, there has to be literally thousands who harbor the same types of resentment, same types of thought, same types of feelings, who don't break. But obviously, we're pushing closer to the breakage boundary than we have in the past and part of the problem is that there are different boundaries. Some are driven by social issues, some by political issues, some by economic issues and you could argue I guess that social and political are often intertwined enough to make the dividing line between them hard to spot.

Interesting note on some of this. Depending on how you look at him, John Brown was either a terrorist or hero. Regardless of which view you hold, he used violence and death to advance his beliefs - which were shaped greatly by economics and religion. When he was captured and killed, some rejoiced, some rang church bells in his honor. 

The Civil war began 16 months later.  

I am exposed to an extremely diverse set of people from the far left to the far right and I see a lot of anger on both sides with little room for compromise on either. I see a lot of economic and social pressures on people. I see a lot of anger and hopelessness swirling around different parts of what hopeless noted above in her post. And I see a rising graph of killings that are driven by one or more of the above where the person or persons involved felt they were right in what they did. If you accept the idea that for everyone who does break, there may be thousands who harbor the same types of resentment and feelings, but don't break, the idea that we're pushing the boundary is the scary one, not what weapon they choose to use.





sharainks -> RE: Mass killings and underlying reasons (4/12/2009 6:40:56 AM)

Its because some people put themselves above all else.  Their feelings, their wants, their sense of injustice or unhappiness matter more than someone else's life.  More often than not here in the US people worship "having".   Then when you don't have as much as the next guy or what you have is taken away you are enraged.  You then use that to justify anything you do. 

Try to legislate that notion out of existence. 

Love of self is the root of all evil. 




rulemylife -> RE: Mass killings and underlying reasons (4/12/2009 6:49:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: StrangerThan

.............the idea that we're pushing the boundary is the scary one, not what weapon they choose to use.




Funny though, the weapon they choose is almost invariably a gun.

Probably just a coincidence.  [8|]




StrangerThan -> RE: Mass killings and underlying reasons (4/12/2009 6:57:24 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: StrangerThan

.............the idea that we're pushing the boundary is the scary one, not what weapon they choose to use.




Funny though, the weapon they choose is almost invariably a gun.

Probably just a coincidence.  [8|]



good way of epitomizing the post just before yours.




slvemike4u -> RE: Mass killings and underlying reasons (4/12/2009 7:08:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: hopelessfool

May i ask a question.. didnt the Oklahoma bomber happen before Columbine? So wouldnt it make it wiser to first deal with bombs then it is with guns

personally i think the underlying cause is people dont care about anyone other then themselves any more. when a tragedy happens first we  make sure the people we know are safe. Then well if others die its okay it wasnt our loved ones.

We are so numb to people dying. And we always blame it on the person being insane or crazy or depressed.

I can tell you i dont honestly believe any of them are crazy or insane or depressed. I think they feel they are doing the right thing. How would you feel if you were told you were getting a d in a class because you turned your paper in late, but the rich white kid after you got an extension because he had baseball practice.

I grew up in a very very very small town, where the love of rock music, and the refusal of church made my principle ask me not to come to school after "violence" happened on school property else where. I was different so i was an outsider. I was a loner, In fact it was voted i would most likely blow up my school before i graduated. I did none of these things. I can freely admit i battle depression and i can admit i have thought of slicing a teachers throat on on occasion.  But Ive never even kicked a puppy.

I dont think the "tool" matters Be it guns a bomb a knife, a bow and arrow a cannon, a large singing off key man dressed in womans clothing... What matters is what causes these people to snap. If we didnt care so fucking much about being better then someone, about rushing in line at the grocery store, or not holding the door for someone behind us. or if we started to care about other people, I think crime in general would drop drastically.

Most people snap because they feel like whats the point of going on any more? Whats the point of caring about others they dont care about me, and since they dont care and they have caused these feelings THEY deserve to die now.

50 years ago, people knew their neigbors they watched their children, people held doors open for others. 50 years ago there werent NEARLY as many violent crimes as today and guess what Mike... THEY HAD GUNS AT THEIR DISPOSAL.

So you have to ask whats the difference between then and now, sure you could say well they have automatic guns now but the difference isnt the weapon or the ability of the weapon its the people. how many of you guys know your neighbors how many of you guys hold doors open for strangers or say thank you or are just in general nice to others. Its really sad when you see people be more kind to animals then they are their fellow humans

Just my jaded loner freak opinion... your insanity may vary
-K


Oklahoma was the work of some demented individuals who had a grudge against the Federal gov't...thankfully it didn't spawn a number of imitators.Therefore we have no need to enact a whole shitload of fertilizer control legislation.Though buying a truckload of fertilizer and ammonia with no apparent reason will garner you some attention these days.
Yes they had guns available 50 years ago....and no there wasn't to my knowledge a whole lot of mass killings.Apparently the world was a simpler place.But,and this is the rub...today we have a problem,do we tell ourselves we didn't need those laws 50 years ago so we don't need them now.
Absent some action or legislation...waiting for someone to answer the why's and wherefore's these killings will continue.They are now part of the American experience,one event triggering the next loon ,inspiring the next nut to step up to the plate and grab his peice of infamy.Are we all content to hope it doesn't touch our loved ones,hope that we can walk thru life not being devestated on a personal level by the next tragedy....All the time doing nothing to curb these events.How many more such events do gun enthusiasts foresee happening before a backlash against guns explodes all across this country.Comprimise,enact some reasonable laws that can address the concerns and add to the public safety would seem to be both prudent and reasonable.




slvemike4u -> RE: Mass killings and underlying reasons (4/12/2009 7:12:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cpK69

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Preventing present atrocity seems a good place to start Philo...as good as any other.If that is intellectual dishonesty....I'm cool with it.


You miseed... by a mile.
 
Kim
And what is it I "missed" Kim?




rulemylife -> RE: Mass killings and underlying reasons (4/12/2009 7:13:16 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: StrangerThan


good way of epitomizing the post just before yours.


Good way of avoiding the issue, which is what this whole thread is based on.

Shhhhhhhh! 

We can't talk about guns here.

Because we all know guns aren't the cause of people being killed by guns.




slvemike4u -> RE: Mass killings and underlying reasons (4/12/2009 7:16:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Preventing present atrocity seems a good place to start Philo...as good as any other.If that is intellectual dishonesty....I'm cool with it.


...good grief. You're not going to get into KittinSol's pants with an attitude like that.....
...good grief Philo.i have come to expect better than this from you...




StrangerThan -> RE: Mass killings and underlying reasons (4/12/2009 7:28:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: StrangerThan


good way of epitomizing the post just before yours.


Good way of avoiding the issue, which is what this whole thread is based on.

Shhhhhhhh! 

We can't talk about guns here.

Because we all know guns aren't the cause of people being killed by guns.



You're right, guns aren't the cause of people being killed by guns. Now can you divert your attention to the cause? 




slvemike4u -> RE: Mass killings and underlying reasons (4/12/2009 7:58:17 AM)

Okay stranger,lets grant you your position(which by the way is quite reasonable) guns are not the reason people kill people....Granted.
Now how about you admit the truth that is there for all to see....Guns make it quite easy for those that decide to kill a number of people to accomplish  just that.Not only easy but rather child like in its simplicity.Obtain guns,stock up on ammunition...pick your chosen hunting environment....and fire.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875