Marc2b
Posts: 6660
Joined: 8/7/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
..oh come on. The US has been happily holding citizens from other countries without trial for years, pot-kettle-black. If it's ok for the US to apply it's justice system to citizens of other countries then it's ok for other countries to do the same to US citizens. All countries have the right to try citizens of other countries if it perceives a crime against its own interests. Now this case appears to have fizzled out, but the idea that other countries have no right to try US citizens, without qualification, is utter rot. It sounds like you are arguing for a tit for tat/they hit me first mommy kind of philosophy. Interesting choice of words: interests and not national security. Of course, all words can mean whatever the speaker wants them to mean. Therein lies the catch. Can the U.S. try Russian officials for the invasion of Georgia? Can Canada try the citizens of another country because it decides that the other country’s trade policies are against their interests? Where do we draw the lines? Or should we not bother to think about the lines at all and simply decide on the basis of our general outlook, of our preconceived prejudices? I hate Bush so fuck them! I love Bush so fuck Spain!
< Message edited by Marc2b -- 4/16/2009 1:14:00 PM >
_____________________________
Do you know what the most awesome thing about being an Atheist is? You're not required to hate anybody!
|