cpK69
Posts: 1593
Joined: 5/9/2008 Status: offline
|
Thank you, all, for the helpful responses. Just to touch on a few things… I am often unsure of just how much I should say, and believe it is possible, in the past, I have said too much. However, maybe unclear stance and intent were more of an issue then how much information was given? Color font (check) Voices, not weird at all. *whistles, and attempts to look around nonchalantly* No offense taken. I actually find it interesting. Possibly because I tend to do the same thing; having someone tell me, I have caused the same effect in them…. Well, maybe I’m just weird. (too?) The “Weakness” thread was a fine example of where I sensed something was inaccurate about the way the word was being perceived, but was uncertain on how to approach. I think working on a more direct approach, with less insinuation is in order. quote:
...and I think you are deliberately choosing to misunderstanding what the.dark wrote -- your comment that your exchange with her convinced you that attention is the reason you should be posting seems disingenuous (at best) to me. I think it is a possibility that I was unclear on what I meant by seeking attention. I am very glad I had that conversation with the.dark, and appreciative of her willingness to participate. The attention I would be seeking is not meant to be aimed directly at me, more like at my main purpose (recently solidified as, ‘seeking truth’), through me. I hope that comes across as less offensive. My thoughts on the ‘World Wide Cheers for Obama’ thread, were troubling to me, as well. I don’t know about cool, but I am hopeful of finding a light to stand in, where I can perhaps be seen as acceptable. I admire your ability to speak your mind in a fluent manner; I have resented myself for my inability, in the same regard. My apologies for taking it out on you, from time to time. quote:
oh Kimmy-Kim-Kimminy-Kim.......... This made me laugh. It reminded me of one of the ‘forgotten’ mythologies I have looked into recently. (thread pending) I understand E, it’s not so much that I have a need to be responded to, just that I realized I cannot know if what I am saying is being taken the way it was meant, if there are no responses. Since it seems, to me, there was a lack there of, I felt it was a good idea to ask, in case there were things I needed to improve upon. I meant the word debate to mean passionate discussion, where participants may not agree; not an argumentative, ‘you can’t be right’ confrontation. I remember a thread where the topic was debating, the conclusion I drew from that thread was that debating was not a negative thing, unless the goal is being ‘right’ above, being ‘accurate’. Perhaps I was mistaken? The point about who is responding, is a good one, the.dark. I figured after three years, if I still weren’t getting it right; must be me. I agree with your sentiments on attention and balance. My best, Kim
< Message edited by cpK69 -- 4/12/2009 2:25:43 PM >
_____________________________
Humility is where weakness and strength meet and humanity begins. one voice
|