IsleofLite -> RE: beyond Obedience (2/2/2006 9:22:04 AM)
|
"Is total and complete surrender more or less meaninglful if it is without thought? " So this gets to be the question of beyond for me. . .is there a place beyond, you ask it here, if we slip past the point where the master's definitions or the world's definitions, or what we know apply, is there a valley there into which we might run and play. If one decides on surrender is it not to ask a new and differing set of questions, and as such are we not then prepared to receive these answers? (as a note here I would say no, many are not, but that is a new post) Tell me please, what possible use can thought be except as a tool to either make the submission a product of ones past or somehow save it for ones future, to make it an investment, to remove it from the actual experience one is having. As such are we not cheapening, even showing our disrespect at the master‘s hand? When a submissive arrives they wish to serve, I hear this often, "I don't know why, I just do. . ." Are they not seekers from the start that board the master's "train" hoping it is taking them to the right station, is it really about the master at all or is there something, somewhere they seek (for themselves), beyond this "meaningfulness" of thought. . . . . .quote:
Is total and complete surrender more or less meaninglful if it is without thought?
|
|
|
|