EStrict -> RE: How important is protocol? (1/16/2004 1:33:43 PM)
|
Hello Sir, My personal views on protocol is they are wonderful things within the context you practice them. My problem with them is the expectaions of others. By that I mean, I know people who tell their slaves, they will address ANY man as Sir or Master, and ANY none slave female as Ma'am or Mistress. Submissives are not slaves, so they have to be called Ma'am. Male subs are Sir. Vanilla strangers are Ma'am or Sir. It's wonderful you want to have strict protocols for your property to follow, but what gives you the right to make other's accept your decision on this? It is the equivalent of dragging a nilla into a scene. There are boards that say all domanints are to be called Sir or Ma'am. They are not boards I will join, for the simple fact it does not fit in with my own beliefs. The only two women I call Ma'am are my mother and grandmother, and neither of them are dominant in any way, shape or form. The protocol that occurs in our home is very important,,, and is not something that we alter. However, we don't expect our guests to follow it, as it is OUR protocol, not something that fits in everyone one elses life choices. Our *houserules* (Ie, smoking only outside or in the pool table/bar area) are not negotiable. It being our house does give us the right to say it is not optional. And just as I have the option of not joining a board that requires things I am not comfortable with, people have the option of not coming to our home if they do not like the house rules. Sandy
|
|
|
|