cloudboy -> RE: Am i wrong...? (2/1/2006 10:05:31 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: GoddessDustyGold I have never fallen into the camp of "beginning from the bottom". I have known Ladies who began as submissives and learned to top. I have also known Ladies who began as submissives and then became practicing and very good Dominants. It is not that they started at the bottom. They simply realized along the way that they were Dominant, not submissive. But again, I am firmly in the camp of "If Dominant, you will never actually submit. You will only bottom." I don't know what it means to submit, because I cannot do it. I would fight it with every inch of My body and soul. Submission is different from being on the receiving end of the whip. Best of luck, wlecome to the boards, and, of course, YMMV. I have been thinking about his subject, namely switching. I have been engaged in ideation about topping my Mistress. Why? I'm not sure exactly. Its not b/c I want to switch and its most definitely not because she wants to bottom. I think mostly, I've been trying to empathise with her position. I've been trying to see what she gets out of "us." I do see it, and at times I am envious. Nevertheless, I don't think my Mistress could "bottom" or submit. This is an interesting distinction, though. I read the cheesy but enjoyable book TOPPING FROM THE BELOW by Laura Reese, which is about a Male Dom. At the end, his sub turns the tables and it was very interesting --- for he could dish it out but he could not take it. (One thing cool about switches is the equanimity.) I'm not sure what that meant about his character, but that's the way it was. The advantage of coming up from below or "beginning from the bottom," is that you really know what its like to be on the other side. Anyway, I'm digressing. No, I am just meandering. I just cannot order up these thoughts. I suppose I'm just wondering about the delineations between DOM and SUB. One way I have been wondering about it is through my topping ideations.
|
|
|
|