marie2 -> RE: Unrequited sub love? (4/26/2009 3:43:13 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Goddess2002 Hello, A female I am acquainted with who identifies as submissive recently became involved with a Dom who wants to collar and tattoo his name on her. She confessed to him that she was in love with him, and his response apparently was that he wants to own her forever, but that it is difficult for him to feel love. She is not the type of submissive who wants strictly play...she is seeking a loving D/s relationship. I think his response to her was B.S....in my experience people either love or they don't...simple as that. Since she is someone whose welfare I care about I would like opinions from Doms. Would you have a sub tattoo your name or collar her knowing that you didn't love her, but that she loved you? Do you feel this is exploitive? I am concerned that she will go to the extreme of getting a tattoo of someone who is just using her for play, when she has said she is hoping for love in return. Any insight would be appreciated. Well he did say he wants a commitment with her, however, if I was looking for a "loving" ds relationship, I wouldn't get involved with someone who told me he isn't capable of love, nevermind get his mark put on my body. I think the best relationships are the ones in which both parties have mutual feelings for each other. I realize some people do fine temporarily with the whole "I love him and need him, but he doesn't love and need me....sigh....such is the life of a slave" bullshit. And while that might seem like uber-romantic twue slavery, it rarely lasts, and when it does end, the "slave" is usually in pretty bad shape emotionally. Nevermind having to look at his mark now forever. From what you've described, it doesn't sound like the odds are in her favor. If I were you, I would suggest that she hold off on the tattoo. She can always change her mind and decide to get it later on. But once it's there, well, it's there for life.
|
|
|
|