LafayetteLady -> RE: waterboarding (5/13/2009 4:01:22 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: marie2 I had to remind myself that we are talking about consentual thrills here. I think it's important to keep this in the context in which it's been presented. By that thought, anything that both parties "consent" to trying is open game to engage in. At some point, someone needs to have the forethought to say "this is a bit too risky". I don't remember the exact link,although I think it was on the ...in the news section on this site several years ago. There was a man who "fantasized" and consented to being enslaved by disappearing completely from the world at large and his only release would be if his "master/captor" killed him. Needless to say he found someone who was willing to assist him with his fantasy, and needless to say the reality was nothing like what he envisioned, but the agreement with his captor was that under NO circumstances was he to be released. Everyone consented, which by the above logic makes it very "ok" to engage in. Yet eventually the victim escaped and the "master" was prosecuted. At some point, the desire to engage in something is not at the extreme end of a calculated risk. At some point it is something that shouldn't be engaged in, because it can not be done safely. I'm not stating whether or not this is the case with waterboarding. Having read BoiJen's post on how it was done, it may be possible to do it safely. The point is that quite honestly, a lot of people would engage in such edge play without the benefit of the class that BoiJen described, therefore they would not be knowledgable enough to not only engage in such play, but likely not be qualified to assess the risk involved. Next thing you know is someone is posting on the "....in the news" board how someone is being held legally responsible for the death of someone who consented to such play and everyone is whining how horrible it is that BDSM is getting such a "bad rap" and the poor master shouldn't be held accountable for drowning his poor slave since they knew the risks when they consented. That kind of logic just doesn't fly in the real world, and no matter how much one likes to engage in edge play, at the end of the day you live in the real world and are held responsible for your actions regardless of who consented to what. And it all happened because the people involved did not assess the risk accurately, did not obtain the proper training and information before trying something just because they thought it would be "hot."
|
|
|
|