|
TreasureKY -> RE: Now Rush has gone to far. (5/13/2009 1:07:31 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen
... I listened to Rush say those words. I even backed up the podcast by 5 minutes and listened to the 5 minutes before and the 5 minutes after he said it.
I'm sorry, but I find that hard to believe.
Kirata has already posted a decent synopsis of what Rush really said, but if you'd like to read for yourself the entire transcript, here's a link.
The complete quote in question is:
I had a bunch of houseguests in for the week, 15 people here from Wednesday night through Saturday night (they all left on Sunday) and at dinner every night, all these topics were discussed. One of the things that was discussed is it turned out everybody had a theory explaining Obama, much like yours, Christine. They just don't think this guy could have risen himself from his own background, had to have a sponsor, had to have somebody orchestrating, directing it, so forth and so on. So everybody started talking about names, who might it be, and of course Soros is a popular one because his hatred of America is well known. His hatred of Republicans is well known. His pocketbook size is also well known.
One of the guests suggesting that it was even somebody like the king of Saudi Arabia after Obama's bow, because Obama is eager to paralyze our ability to defend ourselves, which is what our enemies want. One person, just to show you how much fun we have when we get together -- Christine, you'll probably love this -- one guy in the group said, "Everybody's waiting on a second terror attack. There's not going to be a second terror attack. There isn't going to be one! The terrorists, they're entertainers. They know performance requirements. They know theatrics. They know if they do a second terror attack. They're going to have to make it much bigger than 9/11. Your second act has to be bigger than the first act." He said, "Besides, they don't need a second act. Obama is the second terrorist act!"
Immediately following that, Rush made a comment that I find most important. He said...
"I mean, I had opinions in my house going all over the ballpark. It was fascinating. And these are all, in their own right, involved, intelligent people.
But somebody actually thought Obama is terrorist attack number two. Obama is the follow-up to 9/11."
(Emphasis in bold is my own.)
Now I ask you, is that the kind of comment a person would make if they whole-heartedly agreed with what had been said? If they thought what had been said was serious and credible?
|
|
|
|
