Sirandlittle1 -> RE: evolving from D/s to M/s? (2/7/2006 6:07:57 PM)
|
Thankyou all so much. From the responses here i have identified the questions i had floating in my head. My being asked to address him as Master in play, provoked a panick response that our relationship of D/s was on the move, perhaps toward my perception of M/s. The beauty of many peoples view point response, is i can see, clearly in other's posts, how far along 'our' D/s path we have travelled. He always welcomes my input, and we will often tackle things as a team. I am not a submissive person, im a alpha female. Only He has evoked my submissive response. Despite seeking a Dom or Master before, it just wouldnt happen. My motivation to please my Sir, is not altruistic. If he is happy, then We are happy, and the relationship is roses. So my gain is best served by serving him, pleasing him, and obeying him. I realise now, that we are, what 'we are'. And any defining name we choose is ok. But, from reading the above responses, there does seem to be a general assumption that M/s is more control than D/s. ie. no limits. I too have chosen a man, faults and all, to go with me, woman, faults and all. He is a loving dominant, who would always consider me in his decision making process. Were he not to, i would become defiant. Especially in certain areas, like my children from a previous relationship. Only once, has a request come from him that i did not feel as a mother, i wanted to obey. So i did not and took the consequences. The following communication we had, brought with it, a apology from him, he had gotten it wrong. He was fallable. Exactly like the human i expect him to be. In that instance, push came to shove, and i gave a clear, NO. I was concerned when i posted, that were i to accept slavery to him as a master, that i would not be able to say NO. But really, that is never going to happen for me, when it counts, i will defy anyone, Dom/Master/God whoever. That is who i am. Any Dom i may of nabbed that could not accept that the submissive is right occasionally and they are wrong, would never of lasted with me past the first few meetings. Were i to ever have a master, it would be this Dom. So its not a problem. thankyou all for your contributions. I had not wanted to use the title 'master', even in play only, because i did not understand its use, meaning, implication, or possible consequence. I am grateful for the ability to 'think out loud' in this forum. regards little1
|
|
|
|