RE: Blaming the other you? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


stella41b -> RE: Blaming the other you? (5/18/2009 9:20:51 AM)

There is no 'other' me, I don't compartmentalize, pigeonhole, and I play shortstop for all that I think, do and say in life.




CallaFirestormBW -> RE: Blaming the other you? (5/18/2009 10:10:50 AM)

I've said for years that, regardless of which side of the kneel I've been on, the most important aspect of existing is the personal responsibility I've taken for the choices that I've made. Whether I keep or am kept is an act of choice. Even if I feel drawn to one position or another, acting on that attraction is an act of will, as is sticking to the commitments I've made once I've made the choices that brought us to where I am. There is no escaping my choices. There are always options... sure, the options may not seem viable, but that doesn't discount that the options exist, and that I could, were I inclined to do so, choose a different way.

It is certainly "easier" in some ways to let someone else take the heat for making the decision, but, in the end, when someone chooses to follow, they -are- making a choice and responsibility for the choice lies as heavily on their shoulders as it does on the shoulders of the leader. For me, with that firmly in mind, I find that it is often more productive for me to lead than to follow, since, if I have to take responsibility for something, I'd like to know that it is done to standards that I can feel good about holding myself to... if I -have- to follow, I do my best to choose to follow individuals who I know will not force me to either betray my own directives by putting my name to something I don't believe in, or whose actions will require me to breach the contract I've made in following them. Being a follower can't, in my mind, abrogate responsibility.

Honestly, though, I think that many people just don't put such an excess of consideration into their lives and don't see how all the little things connect. I suspect that there are folks out there who are actively looking for ways not to be responsible for their lives... if only they knew that it just wasn't possible... where would politics and religion be if everyone took personal responsibility for their lives?

Dame Calla




breatheasone -> RE: Blaming the other you? (5/18/2009 11:20:16 AM)

i have seen and heard "s" types say their lot in life, is for them to just "Take masters treatment because he knows best, who am i to question".....i have seen "D" types use the,  "Because I said so, and i'm the "D" type so I must be right" thing..... i think both of those lines of thought need a little work LOL




LaTigresse -> RE: Blaming the other you? (5/18/2009 11:29:12 AM)

Hey now, "Because I said so!"or "Because I am the mom person!" worked great as a mother![:D]




agirl -> RE: Blaming the other you? (5/18/2009 12:36:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

Hey now, "Because I said so!"or "Because I am the mom person!" worked great as a mother![:D]


For me too...until a certain age!

After that?...They question me and my motives?...I question theirs... (and I've had more practise)
.

Don't kid a kidder, kids....lol

agirl




LaTigresse -> RE: Blaming the other you? (5/18/2009 12:38:58 PM)

The funny part, and frustrating at times, they go through a period of time that they think they know more than you. They think you are a blooming idiot. THEN the lightbulb comes on and they realize, they don't know half of what they thought they did and that you were right alllllll along.

Then they start calling you for advice...




sirsholly -> RE: Blaming the other you? (5/18/2009 12:42:05 PM)

quote:

Then they start calling you for advice...

that is when you know they have grown up.....when they no longer know it all [8|]




breatheasone -> RE: Blaming the other you? (5/18/2009 12:49:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

Hey now, "Because I said so!"or "Because I am the mom person!" worked great as a mother![:D]

LMAO, ok got me there![;)]




agirl -> RE: Blaming the other you? (5/18/2009 12:51:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

The funny part, and frustrating at times, they go through a period of time that they think they know more than you. They think you are a blooming idiot. THEN the lightbulb comes on and they realize, they don't know half of what they thought they did and that you were right alllllll along.

Then they start calling you for advice...



I'm nodding here...lol

Two of mine have their own hair-raisers and it's amazing how *wise* they think I am these days.

Of course my sainted MotherSupreme status is crushed by the OTHER two self-centred little buggers that I'm still raising who think my *wisdom* is great when it swings in their favour and as frustrating as a bite from an army-ant when it doesn't.

*What kind of mother ARE you??* ...... * The only mother you've got, pal!* Works for me.

agirl




LafayetteLady -> RE: Blaming the other you? (5/18/2009 1:06:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: breatheasone

i have seen and heard "s" types say their lot in life, is for them to just "Take masters treatment because he knows best, who am i to question".....i have seen "D" types use the,  "Because I said so, and i'm the "D" type so I must be right" thing..... i think both of those lines of thought need a little work LOL


From what I've seen, THIS is where the trouble starts.  Ok, there would likely have been a desire to avoid the responsibility to begin with but that may be the reason they seek this kind of relationship.

Most of the time when this happens, it seems to be with the "new" ones.  The poor things come here looking for advice and while it has changed a great deal since I was here under another screen name years ago, there is still a lot of the "This is what a TRUE whatever is."  Add to that the dimwits calling themselves dominants or masters who think this is a great way to have a maid they get to have sex with and problems are bound to start.

You have the subs who are still young and then are seeing messages that tell them there IS a defininition for slave/sub what have you.  They find themselves with a "master" who is a man using BDSM to cloak the fact that he is nothing more than a supersized asswipe who feels as long as he is "master" he isn't being abusive.  Young, impressionably is told daily, this is what slaves do, this is how they act, you no longer have choices, you must do everything I say regardless of your feelings about it.  Does it excuse the behavior?  Of course not.  But it doesn't make an environment conducive to learning either.  When their gut tells them this isn't right, but their knowledge of the "lifestyle" is still in the early stages, they come here looking for advice and far too often are told, "you knew this was what he wanted when you signed up, so tough patootties."  I cringe each time someone writes about "requesting release" and then being "denied" and not knowing what to do.  Most of us will tell them (sometimes far too rudely) "pack your stuff and leave", but by then they have already been taught by someone who is a jerk that they no longer have that choice.  It is a big catch 22.  We can't tell someone they have no choices and then wonder why they can't think for themselves.

I think far too many people (usually women) enter into this lifestyle because they don't want to take responsibility.  It is so much easier to let someone else be in charge of all the decisions because if it was the wrong decision, they didn't make it, so it wasn't their fault.  The existence of those dominants/masters who think they have all the answers and are like the all knowing "Oz" make the situation worse.  Unless they are doctors, therapists or lawyers, there are far too many times where they should use their "control to get someone to a professional, but they have become so egotisical they are convinced they know better.  It's a bunch of crap.

I'm not going to say that BDSM is a "game", I know that it isn't.  But when I see statements where someone says "I'm a slave who happens to be a person" I have to wonder a couple of things.  First, what other kind of slaves do they know exist (mules, oxen, cows?)? Secondly and more importantly, they have decided somewhere along the line that being a person is secondary and that is never healthy.  Because no matter what you identify as, being a person with a brain has given you the ability to make that identification to begin with.  If you need to stop being a person to achieve your happiness, you have a bigger problem than not taking responsibility for your own actions.




breatheasone -> RE: Blaming the other you? (5/18/2009 1:08:51 PM)

i used to love..."I can't trust YOU!"..... my reply?...."i love you, NOONE in this world will love you the way i do." "i carried you in my body, i loved you BEFORE i even met you." "i would give my life, that you could live." "Who is it you can't trust again?"




Phoenixpower -> RE: Blaming the other you? (5/18/2009 1:38:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady

I think far too many people (usually women) enter into this lifestyle because they don't want to take responsibility.  It is so much easier to let someone else be in charge of all the decisions because if it was the wrong decision, they didn't make it, so it wasn't their fault. 


Well, I think it is still a huge step from not wanting to take responsibility to choosing that lifestyle for "that" reason. When I blame my "other half" then Mr. Adorable knows it is just humour for me. I am living on my own in a foreign country since almost five years and am certainly happily responsible for my actions over here and this would be the last reason for me to enter this lifestyle.

I also met quite a few men where I would easily be in charge and would have the say which way to go...now, I don't want to be in charge that much as for me it has a lot to do with my increasing health issues because as much as I enjoy to be in charge and was always very assertive indeed in my own country, by now my fibromyalgia is getting worse more and more and more. One reason to improve it is to reduce the stresslevel. On that basis it is easier to hand over some of the responsibilities I am having to someone who would like to have them (and who is worth it to hand it over to) to reduce my stresslevel to improve my condition (and is also only "one part" of many reasons for choosing that lifestyle). Therefore, to blame people they might not "want" to take responsibility is one side of a story, for some people to be worn out for a variety of reasons with being in charge 24/7/365 and experiencing deterioration within their health is another story, and then there are still many other reasons for why people are entering that lifestyle. I personally don't think that the reason for not wanting to take responsibility is such a huge one... 




Prinsexx -> RE: Blaming the other you? (5/18/2009 1:41:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subtlebutterfly

Why are there so many people sayin' they're a slave first and foremost, or a sub or dominant or "whatevaorientationyouwannaputhere" first and foremost, and some use that 'label' as an excuse for their stupidity/oversight/mistakes.
I'd have thought you were a person (with a brain) first and foremost but I guess that's just me?[&:]
Sure there's a fine line between the 'label' & the person him-/herself but whyyyyy is this need to blame the label (to me, it seems to be more submissive-thing than dominants)??
It's as if some people find comfort in blaming your otherself cause then its not you who's at fault but your otherself which has suddenly taken on an independent identity.[8|]


Why? because i do, we do... if i look inside i'm not exempt wholly from the process of splitting myself into component parts. And then either pinning it on that part of me or blaming another person altogether.
Taking responsibility is really tough.
I was going to say when i first became a submissive..etc but that's not it as i have always had a submissive nature which actually was also sexualised at a very young age indeed. But it's a fair cop to say i have justified my mistakes by saying to myself, and to others, indeed publicly, even on here...oh it's because i'm submissive, or was his slave and he made me do it, or i felt i had to and so on. And indeed during sub frenzy, which i define as the submissive sexualised part of myself as taking over, then it does indeed truly feel like, in the abnegation of power, or rather the willing transfer of power, then he or it or them made me do it. i lose touch with the consensual part.
Losing touch with any part of the sane, consensual and safe triad can come out of frenzy.
As i have progressed, and my learning has been rapid, then i have come to realise, that rather than being a cessation of responsibility, being submissive and indeed being a slave, means taking a great deal of responsibility... taking the pain, bearing the humiliation, being strong in the absence of reward and/or punishment. Standing up for and taking a stand for having said one is without limits is a very tough and responsible role indeed.
i think i have stopped blaming it on 'because he made me do it'.
And it's not just a submissive flaw. i do know how to be dominant. i'm an alpha female slave (well part of me is...see you can't catch me out). In that capacity i kove to be on the controlling end of the whip as they say with submisssive women as it's the bisexual part of me. i'm also over blaming it on 'because she begged me to'. That's just as irresponsible.
Howvever: progress for me i cannot promise will be in a straight line. Progress fetting better at this stuff, is just like getting better at anything else. i learn, (we learn) surely by making mistakes. By saying; it was her fault, she made me do it, or it was his fault he begged me to. And than wayching friends turn away, the relationship fall apart amnd worse still the same pattern of name, blame and shame happen all over again.
Until i felt how lonely it was at the end of making the other person wong i never learned anything.
Worse than that was the loneliness of blaming it on the submission. Because the submission, unlike another person, never goes away. The submission is here to stay.
But then so are my kids and ageing and being too intelligent and the need for creativity and friends' opinions and God (or not) and the need to be discrete and world poverty and the recession and barking mad MP's diddling the system and coming after the little guys for benefit fraud. There are other things in the woeld right now to blame it on. If you see what i mean.




kdsub -> RE: Blaming the other you? (5/18/2009 1:41:35 PM)

I'm not real sure what you mean... you give no examples...sooo

I am two people at times...so are you I'll bet. There is the normal everyday father and responsible head of family... then there is the slightly kinky, by vanilla standards, submissive...full of almost uncontrollable passion. I do not act the same when in these moods.

I will on occasion do things in the heat of passion that I would not do in my everyday mood. To me it is not using an excuse for blame but giving an explanation for my actions.

It is me and I don't really care what others think because I let people know up front I am these two personalities.

Butch




Fitznicely -> RE: Blaming the other you? (5/18/2009 1:57:47 PM)

I thought for a long time there were two sides to me...the Master and the Normal Human Being....but the more I look at my personality and analyse things I've done and the way I am with people - going way back, I'm starting to see there was never a distinction between the two...

I'm just who I am. I don't apologise or make excuses for what I do. I got over that a long while back, too. If someone takes offense at something I do or say, well, chances are they shouldn't have crossed me [:)].

I tend to think of those that do still see the separation between their SM character and vanilla character....maybe they're not settled into their ownskin enough, y'know, not secure in themselves enough to let whichever is their true character run the show, choosing to keep their mask on, instead. And it's easier to blame that mask than face up to the cold hard truth.




Prinsexx -> RE: Blaming the other you? (5/18/2009 2:10:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fitznicely

I thought for a long time there were two sides to me...the Master and the Normal Human Being....but the more I look at my personality and analyse things I've done and the way I am with people - going way back, I'm starting to see there was never a distinction between the two...

I'm just who I am. I don't apologise or make excuses for what I do. I got over that a long while back, too. If someone takes offense at something I do or say, well, chances are they shouldn't have crossed me [:)].

I tend to think of those that do still see the separation between their SM character and vanilla character....maybe they're not settled into their ownskin enough, y'know, not secure in themselves enough to let whichever is their true character run the show, choosing to keep their mask on, instead.

i simply disagree with you and ask that you respect the disagreement. i think (just an opinion) that we all RELATE to the world from different parts of us. Therefore, logic suggesrs rthat there are different parts of us from which we operate. That is not to say that the parts are dissonant, competeing, fragmented or conflicting. Since you say you used to feel there were different parts then i am simply suggesting that there are but that you all now form a cohesive whole. part of you is aware of all the others. How else might i ask do you know how to choose appropriate behaviours in diiferent situations that require different personalities, persona or actions from you?
(That is what i really dont' get why so many Toms, Dicks (or Harries) here often feel that just because they are D types that they can mail, demand, indeed tresspass on another's property just because they are being D with someone they haven't even met). Because they D all the time? with everyone? At the expense of being anything else?
So my opinion is simply that you are, we are all, parts, parts well integrated perhaps, but nevertheless parts anyway.
It's just my point of view.





Prinsexx -> RE: Blaming the other you? (5/18/2009 2:12:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: stella41b

There is no 'other' me, I don't compartmentalize, pigeonhole, and I play shortstop for all that I think, do and say in life.

Stella: i have to disagree. It's not accusative. I know you. It's just that i think we are all parts, some of us whole, many of us in pieces.
Will mail you.




kdsub -> RE: Blaming the other you? (5/18/2009 2:24:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fitznicely

I thought for a long time there were two sides to me...the Master and the Normal Human Being....but the more I look at my personality and analyse things I've done and the way I am with people - going way back, I'm starting to see there was never a distinction between the two...

I'm just who I am. I don't apologise or make excuses for what I do. I got over that a long while back, too. If someone takes offense at something I do or say, well, chances are they shouldn't have crossed me [:)].

I tend to think of those that do still see the separation between their SM character and vanilla character....maybe they're not settled into their ownskin enough, y'know, not secure in themselves enough to let whichever is their true character run the show, choosing to keep their mask on, instead. And it's easier to blame that mask than face up to the cold hard truth.


lol... I can't get anymore settled in my skin... in fact it is settling too much now. It has nothing to do with comfort, truth, or blame. It is just me acting according to my feelings and mood. These moods just happen to be very different. I'll bet the majority of submissives here on CM act in the same manner... They act one way in private and another in public...they often are very submissive in private but just as assertive as a dominant in public or when crossed by their mate.

It is not unusual for people to have more than one very different face in life. And many will shake their heads at what they do in their other faces.

Butch




Fitznicely -> RE: Blaming the other you? (5/18/2009 2:32:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Prinsexx

i simply disagree with you and ask that you respect the disagreement. i think (just an opinion) that we all RELATE to the world from different parts of us. Therefore, logic suggesrs rthat there are different parts of us from which we operate. That is not to say that the parts are dissonant, competeing, fragmented or conflicting. Since you say you used to feel there were different parts then i am simply suggesting that there are but that you all now form a cohesive whole. part of you is aware of all the others.


In fact, I agree with this wholeheartedly. I certainly AM a multifaceted being. What's happened tho, in achieving cohesion, or perhaps achieving comfort within myself, I am now able to order these facets to present the whole me as one, which, for me at least, is exactly how it always should have been.

quote:

How else might i ask do you know how to choose appropriate behaviours in diiferent situations that require different personalities, persona or actions from you?


The glib answer here is "intelligence". The more involved answer would be that I simply don't have different personalities or persona. Who I am at work is exactly the same as who I am at home, with friends or down the pub. I had a bit of an epiphany when I was 23. In short, I realised that it was OK to just be me. Previously, I did have different masks for all occasions - Brother, Son, Co-worker, Boyfriend.... This gave me a confidence boost that remade me and resulted in the cohesive, intelligent, confident person you see before you (look left [:)])

quote:

(That is what i really dont' get why so many Toms, Dicks (or Harries) here often feel that just because they are D types that they can mail, demand, indeed tresspass on another's property just because they are being D with someone they haven't even met). Because they D all the time? with everyone? At the expense of being anything else?


I think you'll find that those who do that aren't worth a damn. I certainly wouldn't and never have. I have no rights over anyone else's property unless invited. It's the same for human flesh as it would be for a house or car or book. I may ask to borrow it, or barter for it's exchange - IF I WISH - but until that point, it's not mine to play with.

quote:

So my opinion is simply that you are, we are all, parts, parts well integrated perhaps, but nevertheless parts anyway.
It's just my point of view.




Absolutely [:D]




tiinkerbell -> RE: Blaming the other you? (5/18/2009 2:38:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: breatheasone

i have seen and heard "s" types say their lot in life, is for them to just "Take masters treatment because he knows best, who am i to question".....i have seen "D" types use the,  "Because I said so, and i'm the "D" type so I must be right" thing..... i think both of those lines of thought need a little work LOL

I am an intelligent person. I am an educated person. I have a Masters degree. I own my own home, and have almost no bills to my name. I take responsibility for my own actions; including those that placed me in slavery to begin with. Yes, I accept Sir's treatment; Yes, I will, in the future, accept whatever treatment he see's fit. Not only because he says so; but becasue I willingly, and happily gave him that right.

I resent the implication that my thought processes are 'off and need work' simply because we would choose a certain way of doing things.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875