CreativeDominant -> RE: How President Bush's Iraq briefings came with quotes from the Bible (5/26/2009 7:13:17 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Cagey18 quote:
ORIGINAL: Kirata quote:
ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf And then you were answered, and I provided the link. I am missing something or there is a serious miscommunication error here. No need to worry, back to the ping pong match, didn;t mean to interupt the game. Hi Orion, Best I can figure out, CD said he'd like to see a direct quote, Cagey said that's easy and provided a link, and now is trying to score a point over never having actually typed the words, "here is a direct quote." But who knows? I just hope he doesn't try to explain. Judging from the trend so far, it would only make things worse. Kirata Actually, you need to work on that "figuring out" bit K. What CD actually said was: quote:
I'd love to see the quotes on that... direct quotes of him stating that, not something propped up by the media as showing the influence of religion on Bush. I chose to respond to the "see the quotes on that" part, and as later posts proved, the rest of it was BS strawman requiring video proof, else a quote just wasn't up to CD's standards. As for "scoring points", well, if that's what your version of English translates correcting a false accusation as, then well, work on that brushing-up thing too. Actually Cagey, that is B. S.. I never said I required ONLY video proof...what I said was that I wanted a direct quote. You know the type of quote I am referring to right? The type where the speaker's words are considered to be coming directly from him, whether it is in the paper or a magazine, and so the reporter uses those funny little items of punctuation called quotation marks. See, the New York Times article you cited is a reporter's ...a progressive reporter working for a progressive/liberal newspaper...interpretation of what Bush has said and done, it is not a DIRECT quote of what Bush has said and done. Sort of like when George Will writes an article commenting on some news topic of the day. If he is speaking of someone and wants to use their words to damn/praise them, he puts THEIR words in the article but since they are the person in question's real words, he puts Quotation Marks around them. Another example is when Limbaugh comments on a news item...when he wants to use the speaker's words, he says something along the lines of "here is a DIRECT quote" and then proceeds to read the speakers' words. If he wants to back it up more, he PLAYS the tape of the speaker saying those words. Now then, you still have yet to provide any DIRECT quotation from any of the sources I cited, which I will be happy to provide again: newspaper article, magazine article, transcript of a radio or television interview wherein George Bush stated DIRECTLY to a reporter that he was on a divine mission from God.
|
|
|
|