willowspirit -> RE: can a slave hand-pick her master ? (5/25/2009 10:58:02 AM)
|
Natural Law -- means I am a Human Being FIRST. How I choose to live my life flows FROM that fact. If I follow your way of thinking, the first so-called Dominant or self-proclaimed "Master" gets whomever they want? Sort of "First cum, first served" ??? Is that it? And while we're at it, let's get something straight. The titles "slave" and (for the most part) "Master" denote an actual relationship between people. Outside of a relationship -- one where I was wilingly formed into being SomeOne's slave -- if it is over, I revert back to the title of being just a bottom or being called by my personality trait.. IE. "submissive". Maybe calling myself a "former slave" "...frustrated western females with real slavery, which has its roots in natural relations, women are there to obey males, whether they like it or not, this is the natural way, {snippage}... must comply with the natural law and forget their own choices" Question? ALL women are to obey ALL males? And how does this work? Practically speaking, you males, dominant or not, can barely agree about anything anyway. How is some poor little bubble-headed slave-y-poo suppose to know who to listen to? Also, if one woman is already owned, isn't obeying any other male sort of like infidelity... I mean, golly and gee-whiz, the root and history of the word fidelity means loyalty of the serfs to their lord. Obeying other lords makes one an "infidel", wouldn't it? "find some knitting to do while you wait for Mr Right" But, gee, sir, what will you be doing for all that time while you wait ???? Hope you've got lots of lotion and good wrist action!
|
|
|
|