RE: Obama Picks A White Man for the Supreme Court! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Sanity -> RE: Obama Picks A White Man for the Supreme Court! (6/5/2009 12:21:18 PM)


The Democrat-leaning judges were supporting nanny government, and Conservatives were on the side of individual rights, of property rights, as has always been the case.

Welcome to the dark side, by the way... muwah hah hah hah hah hah hah....


[sm=evil.gif]




Sanity -> RE: Obama Picks A White Man for the Supreme Court! (6/5/2009 6:23:50 PM)


Some more context...

quote:

Sotomayor Repeatedly Referenced 'Wise Woman' in Speeches

Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor delivered multiple speeches between 1994 and 2003 in which she suggested "a wise Latina woman" or "wise woman" judge might "reach a better conclusion" than a male judge....

...Her repeated use of the phrases "wise Latina woman" and "wise woman" would appear to undermine the Obama administration's assertions that the statement was simply a poor choice of words. After details of the 1994 speech circulated before the questionnaire's release, Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, emerged from his private meeting with Sotomayor and expressed new concerns about the nominee's "identity politics."


http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/legal_beat/2009/06/sotomayor-repeatedly-reference.html






slvemike4u -> RE: Obama Picks A White Man for the Supreme Court! (6/5/2009 6:33:15 PM)

Context is everything Sanity....even when reading your posts.




Lorr47 -> RE: Obama Picks A White Man for the Supreme Court! (6/5/2009 11:37:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

quote:

Actually 3 of the 5 opinions that she has penned that have made it to the SCOTUS have been overturned, with a fourth very likely (the firefighter case). 

Hmmmm, this would seem to indicate that she isn't such a marvellous jurist after all. It is things like this, not some racist strawman, that should be the focus of the debate over her nomination. If the majority of her rulings that have come before the Supreme Court have been overturned, why exactly is she considered Supreme Court material, seems to me that she is getting it wrong more often than not.


Perhaps Obama just likes the content of her opinions even though overturned and hopes she can someday form a majority on the court which can issue correct opinions.  In the future if she writes opinions overruling conservative mistakes she is merely an enlightened jurist overruling the erroneous opinions of yesterday.




Page: <<   < prev  6 7 8 9 [10]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125