bottominwa -> RE: are you a slave, submissive or sensualist (9/15/2004 7:11:23 PM)
|
This girl would say she is none of the above...smiles. Clarification, she thinks that the term slave is heated and a misnomer of sorts in reality. In her own house the term "servant" is used. By nature i am not a submissive person at all, nor have i ever felt the need to be controlled by anyone or micromanaged, as many presume the driving force behind slavery as seen in the responses previous to Your post. However, as a consenting and intelligent woman, i have chosen to enter into an arranged servitude, by which i have no day to day consensualities. In a traditional scening D/s sense a submissive always has the option to say no. In my own house this option no longer exists if one is to remain in servitude, if one says no...the servitude ends. And in my own house servitude is not slavery in that completel control is exercised over a girl. Instead we are taught to act as extensions of Our Master's will so that He may accomplish more and easier and more effectively. Ideally, if this girl has to be told to do anything then she was not performing her duty, she should sense needs and voids and simply fill them. In these ways my Owner is much more my God or my King, then my Slave Master in a Victorian or other sense...and i am more of a priest, or knight with a pledged servitude. just her two cents, others mileage may vary sabrina King kajiira House of King
|
|
|
|