RE: BDSM Saint? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


BD123 -> RE: BDSM Saint? (9/29/2006 10:52:48 AM)

Is this a proposal to make St. Josephine Bakhita a patron saint to the forms various communities???




Iskander -> RE: BDSM Saint? (9/29/2006 11:22:06 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: candystripper

i thought she had been a slave..and found a real Master. Plus, she had a great story, i thought.

candystripper



It is an interesting story, but indeed I don't think she's anything remotely BDSM...

If you mean she found a real Master in god, then I don't agree with that either, god isn't real, god is a concept, god is a belief.. If god were real, then we would not need to believe, and it is this belief that gives god power...

If you mean her real Master were those she served (helped) after becoming a nun, then I can possibly agree with you..

Still we do not know if she became a nun because she believed, or because she saw it as a way out of her slavery.. We do not know if she remained a nun because she wanted it above all else, or because she was so used to 'serving' that she knew nothing else. (had no other options)
Is that relevant to the deeds she did?! Nup... But geez, if helping a few hundred people means she's a Saint, then whats next? Saint Gates? Saint Jolie?

Organised religion is a crock.. even Jesus said as much... Yet I think we should live our lives as 'religiously' as we can... I think in this day and age we need Saints (read rolemodels, which is all they are and nothing more) more than ever...

May the invisible great pink space pixie shine on you...

Iskander..






BitaTruble -> RE: BDSM Saint? (9/29/2006 11:23:05 AM)

quote:

Is this a proposal to make St. Josephine Bakhita a patron saint to the forms various communities???


Well, she's already caused a dead thread to get resurrected after almost 8 months. Does that count as a miracle?

Celeste [;)]




pinkee -> RE: BDSM Saint? (9/29/2006 1:11:34 PM)

TY Celeste..i wondered why this had been bumped.  Doesn't seem to me it was necessary.
 
pinkee/delectable pink/candystripper




Amaros -> RE: BDSM Saint? (9/30/2006 6:32:11 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: IronBear

quote:

ORIGINAL: candystripper

quote:

Why would there be? During those times the exposure came as part of the colonization (ie taking over) of countries and regions - why would someone really want to be a part of that religion (except to get over or gain favor)?

C~


Do you mean why did people convert? Out of desparation, i assume. Do you mean why did the Church engage in this policy? Myself, i think it's a disrespect for 3rd world cultures.

candystripper



I'd say the conversion started a lot earlier. The Christian Church Movement (Ok it was the Catholic Church) started to convert and change people in every location they had a foothold in that country. In many cases, they simply "Adopted" holy placey and made the Old Ones (Goods and Goddesses) Saints or deliverately built cathedrals over our (Pagan) sacred sites. never forget that Lourdes and the attached Lady was originally a sacred healing site for the Pagans with it's attached Goddess. The same with St Bridgit and her well in Ireland. Stone the crows, wven 98% oif the Catholid Mass is of Pagan Origin. Strangely enough many of the best Pagan Priestesses are good old Catholoc girls who converted to Wicca and other forms of Paganism. (They uderstand the concept of the Goddess ~ Virgin Mary ~ and have a love of ritual.


Absolutely, it's called sycretization: many of the saints were not real people, some of them are pagan dieties or demi-gods, others were local holy personages who performed some miricle that impressed the locals, and were syncretized in order to co-opt them.

This practice of sainting certain individuals or deities really reflects the acentric, creative side of religion: centripetal, monotheistic Judaism would consider the whole business to be idoltorous, but it's a practical matter for a syncretic religion such as Christianity, which is really a political institution that gains and exerts influence by absorbing religions. It becomes easier to understand this if you simply understand Catholicism, the Holy Roman Empire, to be merely an extension of the Imperial Roman Empire, in new clothing, but the same stripes.

Rabbi Yeshua was deified, for example, in accordance with the Eastern concept of the God King to become Jesus the Christ, "the redeemer": King of Kings is a Babylonian formulae - the myth of Jesus is very similar to both the Egyptian Osiris and the Mesopotamian gynocentric Tammuz - (see the wailing wall). Meanwhile, the Romans were adopting a similar concept from the Egytians (Roman paganism was highly syncretic)- the reason Julius Caesar was assassinated, in the opinion of some historians, and which eventually led to the persecution of the early Christians, as the town wasn't big enough for two God-Kings.

The Catholic ceremony of the host (transubstration) is borrowed almost verbaitim from Mithrism, a very popular religion, particularly among the military at the time ancient Christianity was taking shape.




Amaros -> RE: BDSM Saint? (9/30/2006 6:44:38 AM)

Some good books on the subject would be "Holy Blood, Holy Grail", and the "Messianic Legacy", by Biagent, Leigh and Lincoln (the books on whose research the Da Vinci Code was based), which, whatever you think about the central thesis, persents some very detailed and accurate historical background.

A couple of others off the top of my head might be Michalet's "Satanism and Witchcraft", and Otto Friedrichs "The End of the World" which has a chapter on the Langdu'oc crusade.




LordODiscipline -> RE: BDSM Saint? (9/30/2006 6:55:42 AM)

And - at the same time, these are all a means of looking at and rationalizing occurrences that occured (in many instances) without attribution and/or documentation as to the rationale of the cannonization/deification of the saints/peoples involved... so the authors of such books and treatises are really looking at past history which may or may not have had any influence on or in the society/group being considered....
 
Many times such claims of association are specious and without basis - and, are bad science and history.

I seldom ascribe attribution without the ability to understand the data (which is often glossed over inthe explanations provided)

~J




LordODiscipline -> RE: BDSM Saint? (9/30/2006 7:03:00 AM)

But - how much of this is rationalization by modern pagans and social historians today?
 
How much is simply an attempt at sycretization by modern wiccans?
 
As one example -
Lordes use as a place of pagan ritual was over with centuries before the incident occurred there.. to state that a girl knew this history and used it... it silly... (and, the church fought this for a decade - - -so it is not like they set that up as a means of sycretization of the area)
 
The fact is most of the modern "paganiziatic" religions are and were started at USC Berkley in the 1960/70's using the very little information available on the centuries old religious expression.
 
A lot of what is being passed as "lore" and "history" is myth being generated by those who would like to have some legitimacy associated with something which is (*for all practical purposes) lost in time.
 
(Look into the information provided by the folks who tout this religion for where it comes from rather than accept that it is "ancient")
 
~J




raiken -> RE: BDSM Saint? (9/30/2006 7:27:53 AM)

It is akin to the lifestyle lore i often hear from those who claim to be old tymers in leather or old school, etc. Some folks treat the lifestyle as their religion...hec...most folks i know have a religion of some sort, and will go to great lengths to canonize their own...creating their own delusions, and happily believing them, drawing sstrength and a sense of belonging to something greater, and passing it on as fact...for them it is fact, for in their head, they have declared it so.  Ah...The power of belief....




LordODiscipline -> RE: BDSM Saint? (9/30/2006 7:32:44 AM)

quote:

It is akin to the lifestyle lore i often hear from those who claim to be old tymers in leather or old school, etc. Some folks treat the lifestyle as their religion...hec...most folks i know have a religion of some sort, and will go to great lengths to canonize their own...creating their own delusions, and happily believing them, drawing sstrength and a sense of belonging to something greater, and passing it on as fact...for them it is fact, for in their head, they have declared it so.  Ah...The power of belief....

 
Sacrilege!! Sacrilege!!
 
Leather Sacrilege!!
 
Everyone is now required to actively shun you!!
<insert an active shun here>
~J




Amaros -> RE: BDSM Saint? (9/30/2006 7:36:08 AM)

Merlin Stone's, "When God was a Woman" is another, and could be interpreted as just such a Pagan Uchronian mythos, but in fact most of this is based on primary research of primary source documents, Archeology, Anthropology, etc., which are available in Europe and generally accepted in the historical community - Christianity is an Eastern religion, and differs significantly from the traditional forms of Western European paganism of which there are some reliable records.

Montaillou: Promised Land of Error, by Emmanuel LeRoy Laudrie is one such, a contemporary account of the daily life of Cathars in the Langdu'oc region.

There is a huge difference between these and the sanitized, romanticized, reductionist mythos presented by Christians themselves, particularly American Christians, seperated as they are in time and space from the original geographic and cultural contextes in which these belief systems initially evolved.

Contrast the Mormon mythos with the well documented history of the religion and it's founders: there are some very large disparities in both tone and content.




Amaros -> RE: BDSM Saint? (9/30/2006 7:37:51 AM)

Try "Isn't One Wife Enough"? by Kimball Young - highly entertaining.




LordODiscipline -> RE: BDSM Saint? (9/30/2006 7:48:23 AM)

No - Merlin Stone's book is an apologia for all christian based religious mythos that has no sincere basis in historical documents except to cite previous apologist's  writings from about 1800 on..
 
There might be other proof in this direction (I have not read all of the books; but, Stone's "expose" incorporates some of the more insipid and trying mythos of recent time - including the marriage of Jesus (this only goes back to the 15th century and is not directly supported by the 'Gnostic' bibles as some state is the case), the recantification of the garden of eden story using various sources that are clearly demonstrated( and in some instance stated within the source as) speculative revisionism, the movement of Mary Magdelin to France (This defys any probable reason at the time of the Romans!), etc...
 
Anything which might be considered additional story, he included in his book no matter how specious.
 
He does write well  - but, stating that it is supportable through "European" or eastern documentation is like saying that "Ancient European Houses of Slavery dating back centuries is true - and, there is something to it if you can find the proof" (it is circular and unself-supporting in logic or historical proof).
 
~J




Amaros -> RE: BDSM Saint? (9/30/2006 9:34:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LordODiscipline

No - Merlin Stone's book is an apologia for all christian based religious mythos that has no sincere basis in historical documents except to cite previous apologist's  writings from about 1800 on..

Stone or Biagent, et al.?
quote:

ORIGINAL: LordODiscipline
There might be other proof in this direction (I have not read all of the books; but, Stone's "expose" incorporates some of the more insipid and trying mythos of recent time - including the marriage of Jesus (this only goes back to the 15th century and is not directly supported by the 'Gnostic' bibles as some state is the case), the recantification of the garden of eden story using various sources that are clearly demonstrated( and in some instance stated within the source as) speculative revisionism, the movement of Mary Magdelin to France (This defys any probable reason at the time of the Romans!), etc...
 
Anything which might be considered additional story, he included in his book no matter how specious.

Mary Magdelene and the Mary Yeshua is alleged to have married in the Grail books are in fact two different Mary's, the latter a Hebrew princess - and migration to France hardly defies probable reason, as there were Jewish communities as far West as Ireland at the time. What defies probable reason is that the events of the synoptic gospels, second hand accounts and the earliest of which is dated some 50 years after the event are any more credible than any other documentation.

Still, I'm not interested in debating it, until conrete proof emerges wither way - meanwhile I find the myth more compelling and satisfying than the one that negates the family, and makes Joseph a cuckhold.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LordODiscipline
He does write well  - but, stating that it is supportable through "European" or eastern documentation is like saying that "Ancient European Houses of Slavery dating back centuries is true - and, there is something to it if you can find the proof" (it is circular and unself-supporting in logic or historical proof).
 
~J


The fact remains that any Euopean Library or private collection is going to contain more source documents pertaining to European culture: diaries, correspondence, local histories, official accounts, etc., than any American library is going to contain, by the same reasoning that American libraries are more likely to contain similar documents pertaining to local history, the Westward migration, the Civil War, etc. that a European would be likely to run across in one  of their libraries or private collections.

Every library usually has a room reserved for documents and books of local interest, mine does, and I bet yours does too, and they're not going to be available elsewhere except by specific request.

The events of the conscription riots related in "Gangs of New York" are largely accurate, but not typically found in generic histories, and there's a lot of other stuff that you're not going to hear in a high school, or even college level history course.

Analysis of such documents, birth and death records, local township and parish records, etc., among other things, reveal that Medieval Europe suffered from cyclic starvation over the course of centuries, that appear to have killed off as much as a third of the population at various times, an environmental disaster that dwarves the Black Plague, but is found in very few history books.

Among other things, it probobly inspired Malthus, likely led to high rates of mental illness, psychopathy, etc, among the descendents of Europeans, and contributed to the inquisitions thereby, and given them impetus (i.e., the cow goes dry because of witchcraft, not because of soil depletion) as well as increasing the incidence of ergot poisoning that caused mass hallucinations (see St. Anthony's Fire), when bread was made from spoiled rye - there are numerous accounts of this, including one from as recently as 1951.

We're talking thousands of years here, in a highly literate and literary civilizations that kept often meticulous records, extending back through Roman and Greek, as well as Hebrew and other Medditerranian and Middle Eastern civilizations, as well as archeological evidence of their activities.

The accounts of the synoptic gospels appear to occur in a vacuum of cultural and historic isolation - this was patently not the case.




Amaros -> RE: BDSM Saint? (9/30/2006 9:58:40 AM)

The tradgedy in the starvation/inquisition, is that quite often the very people being persecuted and put to death, their property siezed, were the very ones who had innovated or been enculturated in methods of soil enrichment and crop rotation that eventually mediated the conditions of crop failure that led to the starvation.

My cow is dry, and my crops are failing, while my neighbors cow is heavy with milk, and his fields Green - must be witchcraft, no?

One of the great dangers of the ascendency of centripetal bureaucracy and mob populism over acentric individual innovation.




WhipTheHip -> RE: BDSM Saint? (9/30/2006 10:19:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Amaros
One of the great dangers of the ascendency of centripetal bureaucracy and mob populism over acentric individual innovation.

 
You are one smart guy, Amaros.  What is "centripetal bureaucracy."   You spin a committee around and the shit falls to the center and becomes the leader?   What is "acentric individual innovaiton"?  Innnovation by one-armed humans?




WhipTheHip -> RE: BDSM Saint? (9/30/2006 10:23:54 AM)

There is a lot of bdsm in Catholicism.  God is supposed to be the
master and we are supposed to be his masochistic subs.   We
are supposed to enjoy the tortures he inflicts upon us.  Monks
whip themselves or whip each other bloody.  I think there was
a Catholic sect where the men and women whipped each others
naked bodies.




Amaros -> RE: BDSM Saint? (9/30/2006 10:26:23 AM)

Centripetal: arranged about a center as in the petals of a flower, i.e., the Roman Empire around the Emperor, Catholic Church around the Pope, Republicans around the hand puppet.

Acentric: without center, as in the actions of individual preogotive, Da Vinci's Mona Lisa, Einsteins theory of special relativity, Gary Harts sex life.




LordODiscipline -> RE: BDSM Saint? (9/30/2006 10:49:29 AM)

quote:

Mary Magdelene and the Mary Yeshua is alleged to have married in the Grail books are in fact two different Mary's, the latter a Hebrew princess - and migration to France hardly defies probable reason, as there were Jewish communities as far West as Ireland at the time


That is not the issue -
 
The areas of concern would be:
1. Availability of rare billets on board a vessel to an (unwed mother) single woman without papers in lands losely controlled by the Romans
2. Gaining embarkation at the start as a known conspirator  - and, not being turned in to the authorities... a real past time in Judea at the time.
3. Surviving a multiple multiple multiple legged sea voyage that would last months (> a year?) on board ship was rare for health men of middle age (~22 years old at the time) - she was a matron (~34 at the time of the alleged voyage) and one who had led a hard life by all accounts.
4. Being allowed on any ship... unless a person owned a ship, they were seldom considered to be allowed on - let alone a woman (The Romans developed the supersition, developed from Mesopotamian tales about a woman's unluckyness on a sea going vessel)
5. There were not viable or flourishing jewish communities in those areas at those times... they were barely under control of the romans and strangers to outpost areas were generally... well  - killed for their money and thrown into the nearest hole. It is not as though she booked passage through Expedia. Legs were negotiated at the place of embarkation... and there would be the need for translators, local currency/exchange.. potentially a contact.
 
One stop in Sicily (a common travel mid-point) and she likely would have been enslaved for her foreign disposition.
 
Anyhow - it is entirly improbable and highly unlikely and has no proof of occurrence. It was not until the 15th and again the 18th century that such tales pop up - uibndicating they were fiction and lore more than reality.
 
Nice tales to muse over.. nothing more.

quote:

The fact remains that any Euopean Library or private collection is going to contain more source documents pertaining to European culture: diaries, correspondence, local histories, official accounts, etc., than any American library is going to contain, by the same reasoning that American libraries are more likely to contain similar documents pertaining to local history, the Westward migration, the Civil War, etc. that a European would be likely to run across in one  of their libraries or private collections. 


Rubbish - entire collections are bought and sold all of the time and private correspondence goes to the highest bidder of which America is capable of competeing with any European goivernment or privateer.
 
Besides which - The references are mostly avauilable to anyone who cares to utilize them... Just because something is in a European library or collection does not mean that it is inviolate and subscribed to only that area [of the world]; I own private correspondence from Europe which is documented and available to scholars at request... Because something is local does not mean it is isolated and unavailable.
 
Does it make it more inconvenient?
 
Most  certainly - but, not insurmountable - and synopsis on most documents known to exist are available for referencing and understanding of paths towards research.

quote:

Analysis of such documents, birth and death records, local township and parish records, etc., among other things, reveal that Medieval Europe suffered from cyclic starvation over the course of centuries, that appear to have killed off as much as a third of the population at various times, an environmental disaster that dwarves the Black Plague, but is found in very few history books. 


Usual and common conditions do not make the current edition of most newspares either - but, they exist. Starvation was a normal occurence and not a "reportable" event at the time - and, although it is not reported in many historical books that the masses read - it is not as though it were hidden or obscured... it is there and evident.
 
quote:

  We're talking thousands of years here, in a highly literate and literary civilizations that kept often meticulous records, extending back through Roman and Greek, as well as Hebrew and other Medditerranian and Middle Eastern civilizations, as well as archeological evidence of their activities.

The accounts of the synoptic gospels appear to occur in a vacuum of cultural and historic isolation - this was patently not the case.


I never claimed it was  - I am staitng that most of the "proof"< provided for such specious allegations and "proofs" were not recorded or evident until more than a millenium after the events concerned... and, are used in this day and age as "proof" of these idiocies.
 
The academic world censures such things as silly and ludicrous because they know the proofs and the sources while popular culture and the media demand more of it as titliating and allegedly "new proof" of things that never occurred...
 
Just because a book is written - just because someone says it is "so" is not proof...
 
Just because someone writes a tome about something and provides reference to a book over 200 years old is not proof.
 
As in all things .. the thing to do is to consider the source -read the arguments, look at the reference to the reference - before assuming it is not done to simply make a name for hte author or money for the publisher.
 
~J




LordODiscipline -> RE: BDSM Saint? (9/30/2006 10:51:34 AM)

quote:

You are one smart guy, Amaros.  What is "centripetal bureaucracy."   You spin a committee around and the shit falls to the center and becomes the leader?   What is "acentric individual innovaiton"?  Innnovation by one-armed humans?


If you spin a committee - the shit spins to the outside, splattering all of those who are not in the comittee or at the center - it is also called "delegation".

~J




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875