cloudboy -> RE: married sub (2/21/2006 8:33:26 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MsSonnetMarwood [1] I can't agree that being married X number of years is somehow an acheivement just because of the years put into said relationship. [2] Indeed, being married for many years where there is ongoing communication, mutual respect and honor, honesty, etc., is indeed a real achievement, even if the relationship isn't perfect or takes paths that neither anticipated. [3] Being married for 10 years where he (or she) goes out and cheats, things aren't talked about, etc? Nope. Can't call that an "acheivement". quote:
Bitatruble made a good point, where has the OP gone? We're all just talking to ourselves, [pause] now I just feel used [tears welling up....] I am such a fool...... A couple days after he posted this topic here, he posted the same topic, same question under Ask A Mistress. I pointed out he'd already posted the question here, and he briefly responded something along the lines wanting to ask the Mistresses as well (as if we hadn't already answered here). The thread quickly disappeared, as expected. I can accept your distinction between #s 1 & 2. There are so many factors to consider --- but the thing I'm trying to focus on is "being there." For most on this thread, few if any are in a mature, functioning marriage. So, their understanding of such a thing is theoretical, principled, anectdotal, etc. My point about long term monogamy is this: The idea that your spouse will be, should be, can be everthing to you over the course of your entire lifetime is a damaging expectation / ideal. Not only is this generally untrue, it is also basically unfair. Katherine Hepburn had four serious impact affairs over her lifetime. They were not just a series of vapid, empty, sexual adventures --- but key intimate relationships outside of her marriage. She was enriched. I don't like a system that transforms her enrichment into a betrayal or moral wrong. Next, when your spouse is enriched, you become enriched as well. The trick is not being possessive and ego centric about one's own marriage --- and not thinking of yourself as the very end of your spouse's frontiers. Folks sneaking around and "cheating" as others put it, is more a product cultural values and religiously influenced marital expectations whereby people don't feel they have freedoms or choices to exercise. I harken back to KoM, whose wife said to him upon getting married, "I will share you." Right then and there he was liberated, he escaped the trap. If I recall, he was then monogamous with her for some ten (10) years thereafter. Then, he went poly but stayed married. His case is exceptional. As for me, I'm categorically against the lifetime ownership component of marriage. To me its somewhat akin to a Government setting taxes so high that businesses and proprietors lie to get around paying the taxes that would otherwise drive them out of business. So, "cheating" is actually the dirty little secret about marriage as well, its what people do to stay married. There are other release valves as well: alcohol, drugs, golf, porn, prostitutes, complaining, anger, resentment, envy, resignation etc..... funny how out of this menu a productive, engaging, extra-marital relationship is "the greatest evil." Here's a question for you. Did Merryl Streep's character in THE BRIDGE'S OF MADISON county "cheat" on her husband? Would you have advised her to have told her husband about the liason? Would you have advised her that without "pre poly consent" she was wrong to shack up with Clint Eastwood for four days?
|
|
|
|