RE: "A.I.G. Balks at Claims From Jet Ditching in Hudson" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


KenDckey592 -> RE: "A.I.G. Balks at Claims From Jet Ditching in Hudson" (6/16/2009 11:18:17 AM)

The validity of claims is not important.   If I remember my international law correctly, under General Average, the plane wouldn't ahve been there if it hadn't been for the people and cargo on it.   They should reimburse the insurance/airline for their loss.




Sanity -> RE: "A.I.G. Balks at Claims From Jet Ditching in Hudson" (6/16/2009 12:21:03 PM)

Nice bit of trolling, that. This is the political section, so please quit acting surprised every time politics are discussed...

Your spin is that I don't have any right to post because you don't like my politics... and so you attack me like this wherever I post and try to derail every thread you see me in with this kind of crap.

You're fast approaching my ignore list because this is all you ever do, you never contribute anything worthwhile, not that I see at least.

Just your baiting and your personal attacks.

It's getting old.



quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Only you could spin a thread concerning the business practices of an Insurance Company into such a contortion so as to indict our current sitting President.



You totally misunderstood my post. My point was, imagine the spin we would be hearing if the president were a Republican and it appeared that AIG had bought and paid for him. It wasn't an attack on Obama, but I can understand why you feel the need to be so defensive - it does look really  bad, doesn't it.
Defensive,not at all....amused would be a better description .Claiming you were only drawing attention to what would have happened during a Republican Administration is nothing more than another spin.Your history of anti Obama posting is well documented and puts the lie to this current claim



quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u
It must kill you that this man at this time is sitting in that office......your going to have a blast for the next 7 1/2 years.Watching your obvious discomfit is,for me, a true pleasure rarely afforded over the internet.


It doesn't kill me, mike. I understand that politics run in cycles and, while a Socialist is in office now, history shows that in a few just short years he will be soundly rejected because while the man's personal popularity remains high, his policies are very unpopular. For example, his plan to sneak socialized health care into law is lacking in needed votes because of opposition from within his own party. The AMA was booing him just today...

Don't even get me started on his handling of the economy.

But as to any "discomfit", I believe that's all yours, otherwise you would be addressing the substance of my posts rather than trying to obfuscate the real issues that are before us with your underhanded baiting, personal attacks, and attempted hijacks.  [;)]
Inject some substance into your post's and I will be pleased to address them....As for hijacks......pot,kettel,black...it was you who injected the Oval office into this thread concerning insurance companies......you are amusing Sanity...and for that I thank you.






ModeratorEleven -> RE: "A.I.G. Balks at Claims From Jet Ditching in Hudson" (6/16/2009 12:36:55 PM)

Children...

XI





Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.015625