ThatDamnedPanda
Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MarsBonfire Hummm... yes, well, "lack of experience" would disqualify someone from serving in Congress, wouldn't it? Oh, wait, no it wouldn't! When it comes to Franken's "inexperience" I guess he's in good company... 36 of the 49 newly elected senators this year have two years or less experience in political office. About a third of them are just regular citizens who ran for the office. (You know, it's that whole "self-governance" thing those nutty "Founders" thought up. Sheesh, what a bunch of loons, eh?) Are you talking about Senators, Mars, or Representatives? I think you got a little mixed up there. According to the Senate's website, of the 100 current members of the US Senate, 96 have held some form of government position in the past, whether it be elected, appointed, or staff positions. Of the 4 who haven't, 2 are attorneys, 1 is a businessman, and the 4th is Franken. As I'm sure you'll recall, the Senate was intended by the Framers to be the "senior" house, the upper house, and the House of Representatives was meant to be more representative of the average citizens. It's very unusual for someone with no prior government service to even take a serious run at a Senate seat, much less win one. And most of those who do are attorneys, who can arguably be called quasi-public servants, as officers of the court, as well as having a comprehensive educational background in law and government affairs. Franken's lack of government or other public service experience is in stark contrast to almost every other sitting member of the Senate, and combined with his demonstrated volatile personality, raises legitimate concerns about his qualifications for the office he now holds.
_____________________________
Panda, panda, burning bright In the forest of the night What immortal hand or eye Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?
|