RE: Respect...to earn or not, that is the question (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


LadyPact -> RE: Respect...to earn or not, that is the question (7/3/2009 8:04:12 AM)

It is My belief that I can extend courtesy to everyone.  Respect is something that has to be earned in one way or another.  There has to be something about that person who has gained My admiration in some way.  That can range from anything to personal accomplishments or position they have worked for.  It can be based on a lot of things, but it does have to be based on something.  In other words, I have to know the person, or at the very minimum know of the accomplishments, for someone to earn My respect.




SassySarijane -> RE: Respect...to earn or not, that is the question (7/3/2009 8:10:54 AM)

I do not automatically respect anyone. I am courteous to others, but respect is earned. I don't expect anyone to respect me unless I earn it. I don't even expect courtesy from anyone, but I enjoy it when courtesy is extended to me. It is a shame people aren't courteous to others so much anymore and it has become something to remark on and remember when it happens, rather than the norm.




NihilusZero -> RE: Respect...to earn or not, that is the question (7/3/2009 8:14:03 AM)

Courtesy, tact and respect are three subtly distinct things.




Andalusite -> RE: Respect...to earn or not, that is the question (7/3/2009 8:18:57 AM)

I agree! I also admire a lot of people who I don't necessarily feel *respect* toward, that has more to do with how good they are at something, or at juggling their lives, and such.




RCdc -> RE: Respect...to earn or not, that is the question (7/3/2009 8:24:54 AM)

FR

I don't believe respect is 'earnt'- it's not money - it's like love - it happens or it does not.  You cannot force it however much you try.
 
What baffles me is that when someone demands respect and they are always told - 'No!.... Respect cannot be given nor demanded, you must earn it!' 
Erm... am I the only one who sees the irony there?
 
the.dark.




RedMagic1 -> RE: Respect...to earn or not, that is the question (7/3/2009 9:24:24 AM)

I think there's a lot of miscommunication about what is respectful and what isn't.  A man emails a woman and she doesn't write back.  Is she being disrespectful?  Someone doesn't compliment you when you think it is socially appropriate to do so.  Is that person being disrespectful?  Someone doesn't hold the door open for you... I think you can see this list could go on forever.

When someone does or doesn't do something like that to me, I assume they were busy, stressed, forgot, whatever.  I know a lot of people would jump to, "So and so doesn't respect me."  That just seems like an invitation to drama.  Why not give someone the benefit of the doubt, and remain cheerful?




beargonewild -> RE: Respect...to earn or not, that is the question (7/3/2009 10:01:23 AM)

~FR~

Why not look at tact, common courtesy and politeness all being under the umbrella of respect? We can respect a person's beliefs, their age, their life's experience and so on. Being polite to another person whether we know them or not, is at some level giving them a sense of respect because they are a fellow human. To state a person has to "earn" respect is just another way of subtly indicating they aren't worthy enough and have to prove themselves of having respect, something just doesn't add up here. It reminds me of we are all equal though some are more equal then others attitude.
   It makes more sense looking at respect as a quality which we all give and take so to speak and it's when we gain a better understanding and admiration for another that our sense of respect increases. It also works in reverse were we lose respect for another when their character proves to be less then what we first anticipated or presumed.
   I find it quite interesting on how others view this subject especially compared to my own. I will and do give a person a certain measure of respect which I base that respect on the personality traits they outwardly portray. It is also taken into consideration how that person speaks, the way they speak and importantly; the specific words they use to get an opinion across.




NihilusZero -> RE: Respect...to earn or not, that is the question (7/3/2009 10:14:48 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Darcyandthedark

FR

I don't believe respect is 'earnt'- it's not money - it's like love - it happens or it does not.  You cannot force it however much you try.

What baffles me is that when someone demands respect and they are always told - 'No!.... Respect cannot be given nor demanded, you must earn it!' 
Erm... am I the only one who sees the irony there?

the.dark.

It's a confusing way to say it, yes. Essentially, they mean: "You must merit the respect I may give to you. Which means that, over the course of a certain period of time, your actions and words must convince me sufficiently that you have the inner persona of someone with characteristics and traits I would feel respect towards."

It gets even more convoluted when we start taking personal perception into account...for instance when someone decides to rescind their respect of someone based on a certain action because it's presumed that that action is some sort of epiphany that shows the person for who they 'really are', as opposed to all of the actions and words before that which bolstered the feeling of respect.

Sometimes people just mean: "You must prove, consistently, that you are what I think/hope you are."




marie2 -> RE: Respect...to earn or not, that is the question (7/3/2009 10:26:26 AM)

gr

Respect is something that I feel for someone if and when there is something about the person that I've grown to respect.   But I also think it's possible to behave in a respectful manner towards a person that I may or may not feel respect for.  Being courteous and well-mannered can be viewed as respectful behavior.  I think there are different levels of respect just as there are different levels and types of "trust" or "love" or "care" and all those other funky words that can't really be defined.




mdr080480 -> RE: Respect...to earn or not, that is the question (7/3/2009 10:32:54 AM)

I go with courtesy first. I will try my best to be courteous. If being courteous is respectful than that's me.

My grandfather said it best to many people, you don't have to respect your elders just because they are older. Older does not equate to wiser or smarter, just as self appointed titles don't equate to respect. So I guess I may be in the respect is earned crowd. I am not sure I can respect someone who demands it be given to them. Though I will show courtesy to anyone who shows it themselves, whether onto me, those around them or me, or themselves.






oceanwinds -> RE: Respect...to earn or not, that is the question (7/3/2009 11:14:55 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened

I think a lot of times people confuse respect with trust.  I think everyone deserves a certain amount of respect at the get-go at least respect as a fellow human being.  I don't need to trust them, just basic respect.  My dad taught me "Trust everyone but always cut the cards." 

And I tend to agree with you that after the initial basic respect, a person gains or loses my respect based on their actions.  Prior to knowing a person's actions why would I assume they deserve no respect at all?  Trust, on the other hand, has to be earned. 


I totally agree with your post, eyesopened.

I am respectful to everyone, especially when I first meet them. Trusting everyone is not a given from me to another. That needs to be built over time.




LdyWintershade -> RE: Respect...to earn or not, that is the question (7/3/2009 11:17:39 AM)

quote:

I think that there are different -types- of respect, and that there is a modicum of respect due in certain situations that is not applied to a -person-, per se, but to an office or a position, and which should hold its station irrelevant of the office/position-holde
quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW

quote:

Should it be given freely to everyone? Or should one have to earn it?


I think that there are different -types- of respect, and that there is a modicum of respect due in certain situations that is not applied to a -person-, per se, but to an office or a position, and which should hold its station irrelevant of the office/position-holder.

For example: There is a measure of respect that one has for offices like "judge" or "physician" or "Senator" or "Prime Minister". Regardless of the person, the office is treated with a measure of dignity. Even when, say, a President shows some human flaw, the office garners ones respect as a representation of what it is meant to be.

There is another kind of respect that is garnered for skill. We respect the obvious effort it took to learn to do something or become something, regardless of the characteristics of the person. "He may be an ass, but he's a really good chef!"

Then there is the respect we offer to an individual who seems to have hir act together, and who exemplifies some or most of the characteristics that we see in a leader, either personally or in a group to which we belong. I think it is -this- kind of respect that people talk about when they talk about having to "earn" respect. It takes a while to get to know someone well enough to be able to say "This is a genuinely -worthy- person, who has earned the right to stand up and be seen in this dignified way, and be treated as a worthy individual by me. This is someone I look up to, and someone I am willing to take advice from with all due seriousness."

To me, this is completely separate from what I consider "courtesy", which are the basic manners that we use in how we associate with others. It is the absence of basic -courtesy- that generates the idea of 'rudeness', and courtesy, at least to me, should be applied liberally, without concern for whether an individual has 'earned' any particular status or not. Courtesy can be expanded on in order to display respect, but there is a base level of what I consider "good manners" that can be obtained for just about any situation, and the use of these courtesies, including some marginal use of things like titles and forms of address, is not so much an issue of 'respect of someone else' as it is 'self-respect'.

Dame Calla




I agree that there are positions that are given respect, regardless of the individual.  However, even those can become jaded when the person holding them tarnishes or diminishes them.  On the whole, I would agree with the formula introduced by the OP.  There is a basic respect I try to show everyone, initially and that either increases or decreases based on how they behave, react, treat others (and me), etc.  A bit of an abstraction, but a very interesting question to pose. :)




DesFIP -> RE: Respect...to earn or not, that is the question (7/3/2009 11:21:42 AM)

It doesn't matter if you don't think respect shouldn't be earned. What matters is that you won't get any from me unless you earn it. So if you wanted a relationship with someone like me, you either earn it or you don't get to have any kind of a relationship.

Your views won't change anybody else into giving you something they don't believe you should have. You can declare you are dominant all you want, but if someone else views you as a wanker, then you'll always be a wanker in their eyes.

As to how to earn it? Use manners, rudeness is inexcusable. Keep your word as far as you can and you had better have a good reason for not keeping it.




WoodenPaddle -> RE: Respect...to earn or not, that is the question (7/3/2009 1:58:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: IrishMist

And once again, here we are debating/discussing something that is useless to actually debate or discuss. No one, absolutly no one, defines respect in the same way as another person...and you can pull up every single definition of the word that has ever come into use, and you will still never have EVERYONE in agreement.


quote:

Here are some of the properties of respect.
-Respect is something most people want/expect/demand.
-Respect is something one has to gain. And to do so, one has to work for it.
-Respect has to be kept. And to do so, one has to work even harder.
-Respect is easily lost. Be careless or don't pay attention and it is gone before you know it...*chuckles*...very much like money in that aspect
-Respect is almost impossible to regain once it is lost.

Are these YOUR properties? Or are they actually defined, factual properties of respect?
The bolded areas, I am sorry, but are you sure that you are not confusing respect with trust?


MY properties? General properties? Good question, but like you stated everyone will have his/her own definition.
Yes I think I can state that for most people it holds true that once respect is lost it's hard to regain.
FYI, if you read my post you know I believe it has to be earned. And yes, it's MY belief that one has to work for that. But once again, just reading the comments here I feel I can safely state many (if not most) people here seem to agree on that, so perhaps it IS a general property.

Am I confusing trust with repect? Not at all. Trust may have properties that can run along the same lines, but it's a completely different area. Just as liking someone and respecting someone are different. There certainly are people I dislike but do trust in some things, just as there are people I dislike but respect.


quote:

I think that all too often, people confuse respect with courtesy; yes the two have some similiar ideas; but in reality, they are two different words with two very distinct, and different definitions.

Respect is earned; courtesy, on the other hand, should be extended to everyone without thought ( yes I know...I am not the most courteous person [8D], but then, I have never tried to be )


*lol*...I agree on that. Now, to make it a bit harder, can anyone define the exact border between courtesy and respect?
I really doubt it.




TEMPERANCE -> RE: Respect...to earn or not, that is the question (7/3/2009 3:54:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WoodenPaddle


Now the age-old question. Does one have to EARN respect? Or should everyone be respected right from the start?



I always treat people with respect, because that is common courtesy, but it is a basic level of respect.  Unless of course they have shown they are not worthy of my respect in which case they can sling their hook...  For someone to have my full respect they will have had to earn it..... people should not automatically expect to be respected, and usually those that do turn out to be complete idiots anyway. 




TEMPERANCE -> RE: Respect...to earn or not, that is the question (7/3/2009 3:59:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WoodenPaddle

*lol*...I agree on that. Now, to make it a bit harder, can anyone define the exact border between courtesy and respect?
I really doubt it.


Ere you go...

Definitions of Common courtesy on the Web:
·         Etiquette is a code of behaviour that influences expectations for social behaviour according to contemporary conventional norms within a society
Definitions of respect on the Web:
·         esteem: the condition of being honoured (esteemed or respected or well regarded); "it is held in esteem";  
·         an attitude of admiration or esteem;  

Definitions from Wikipedia





NihilusZero -> RE: Respect...to earn or not, that is the question (7/3/2009 4:02:04 PM)

We still seem to have plenty of disparity between the use of the word "respect" and where "courtesy" should be instead.

If you (general you) respect someone you actually don't know yet...well, that's rather foolish. Respect lies in an appreciation of the trait(s) a person exemplifies. It makes no logical sense to "respect" someone you do not know because it means you have no prerequisites for giving that respect (which makes rescinding it seem a bit silly).

Now, courtesy...makes a bit more sense to give to everyone as a general rule of thumb. Although, I normally gauge my courtesy relevant to the courtesy level of others. I don't have to know much more about a person that whether they smile or roll their eyes to a friendly hello to determine whether I'm adjusting the level of courtesy I offer them.




Apocalypso -> RE: Respect...to earn or not, that is the question (7/3/2009 4:28:52 PM)

It should be recognised that it's very possible to be courteous and very rude at the same time.  I'd argue that's what a lot of what's seen as "wit" boils down to.   Oscar Wilde is a spendid example of what I'm talking about.

I'm actually less courteous with people I know well and respect.  I'm far more likely to insult a good friend than I am a stranger.




LaTigresse -> RE: Respect...to earn or not, that is the question (7/3/2009 4:37:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

It is My belief that I can extend courtesy to everyone.  Respect is something that has to be earned in one way or another.  There has to be something about that person who has gained My admiration in some way.  That can range from anything to personal accomplishments or position they have worked for.  It can be based on a lot of things, but it does have to be based on something.  In other words, I have to know the person, or at the very minimum know of the accomplishments, for someone to earn My respect.


What LadyPact said....

I give almost everyone courtesy. I respect very very few.




CatdeMedici -> RE: Respect...to earn or not, that is the question (7/3/2009 4:52:52 PM)

To respect someone from the start means I have to respect Jim Jones, Charles Manson, Idi Amin---sorry, respect IMHO is earned and is not a blanket statement--and it can be lost as well.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625