Fairy

Fairy (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Humor and Games

Message

LotusSong -> Fairy (7/3/2009 9:42:02 AM)
A married couple in their early 60s was celebrating their 40th wedding anniversary in a quiet, romantic little restaurant. Suddenly, a tiny yet beautiful fairy appeared on their table. She said, 'For being such an exemplary married couple and for being loving to each other for all this time, I will grant you each a wish.' The wife answered, 'Oh, I want to travel around the world with my darling husband.' The fairy waved her magic wand and - poof! - two tickets for the Queen Mary II appeared in her hands. The husband thought for a moment: 'Well, this is all very romantic, but an opportunity like this will never come again... "I'm sorry my love, but my wish is to have a wife 30 years younger than me." The wife, and the fairy, were deeply disappointed, but a wish is a wish. So the fairy waved her magic wand and poof!..the husband became 92 years old. The moral of this story: Men who are ungrateful bastards should remember.... ~fairies are female.

sirsholly -> RE: Fairy (7/3/2009 10:30:40 AM)
[:D][:D][:D][:D]

VeryNastyDom -> RE: Fairy (7/3/2009 12:12:40 PM)
This is why poly has its charms. He could have asked to trade his 60 year old wife for two 30 year olds, or if his heart was still in good shape, he could go for three 20 year olds.

LotusSong -> RE: Fairy (7/3/2009 12:20:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VeryNastyDom This is why poly has its charms. He could have asked to trade his 60 year old wife for two 30 year olds, or if his heart was still in good shape, he could go for three 20 year olds. A woman can satisfy upto 5 men (3 holes, 2 hands-no waiting) at one time..when a guy can service 5 women equally at one time.. then poly might be a valid option :)

Kelicous -> RE: Fairy (7/3/2009 1:58:22 PM)
LMAO good post

NightTigress -> RE: Fairy (7/4/2009 8:42:54 AM)
quote: A woman can satisfy upto 5 men (3 holes, 2 hands-no waiting) at one time..when a guy can service 5 women equally at one time.. then poly might be a valid option :) you are forgetting about the times the girls play with eachother, the guy does not need to do all the work

mydestiny2043 -> RE: Fairy (7/4/2009 8:58:19 AM)
[sm=LMAO.gif]

LotusSong -> RE: Fairy (7/5/2009 9:50:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: NightTigress quote: A woman can satisfy upto 5 men (3 holes, 2 hands-no waiting) at one time..when a guy can service 5 women equally at one time.. then poly might be a valid option :) you are forgetting about the times the girls play with eachother, the guy does not need to do all the work The fact remains.. women are the superior sexual machine. [:D] I never could figure out why somebody would take on more than he could handle.. but then.. that's a whole 'nother thread.

SteelofUtah -> RE: Fairy (7/5/2009 10:36:56 AM)
Not to be crass here but A Man can please 6 women at the same time. One on each big toe (According to some it is the superior sexual organ) one on each hand one on his face and one on his Penis. By this Logic a Woman certainly has the equipment to pleasure that number of men however due to the nature of the act of the abiliy to do this all at the same time is not realistic where if a man lays down spread eagle he can work each part independently and manage to pleasure all parties simultaneously. This being the case when women can accept that the Sexual Machine is the ability to Stimulate the men certainly take that moniker, however most men are ignorant to what to do to stimulate and this is why most women remain unsatisfied. It has been proven that the average man takes 2 minutes to reach orgasm and the average woman takes 20 minutes it would serve men and women alike to not focus on the Coital aspect of sex and more of the exploratory. Fingers and Toes are more likely to being a woman to Orgasm than the Penis is simply because of the ammount of time involved. Steel

darchChylde -> RE: Fairy (7/5/2009 10:26:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LotusSong quote: ORIGINAL: NightTigress quote: A woman can satisfy upto 5 men (3 holes, 2 hands-no waiting) at one time..when a guy can service 5 women equally at one time.. then poly might be a valid option :) you are forgetting about the times the girls play with eachother, the guy does not need to do all the work The fact remains.. women are the superior sexual machine. I never could figure out why somebody would take on more than he could handle.. but then.. that's a whole 'nother thread. Sorry to disagree, LotusSong... but as far as anatomy itself is concerned, women are not a sexual machine at all. Being (as per the physical necessities of the act of sex itself) passive, the man is the only "sexual machine" involved in male/female copulation while the woman merely provides a particular combination of lubrication, friction and pressure. In essence, a receptor with a lovely set of accessories. I'm sure that you would like to say that there is more to sex than the specific act of copulation, but that is what would blow your argument out of the water; as it is entirely possible for a man to ejaculate several times in a session and in between those times of copulation he can continually stimulate the woman both digitally and/or orally so that she may keep having her own repeated orgasmic satisfaction whilst his penis is simultaneously being primed for another engagement. Physiologically, men are the workhorse in the arrangement whilst the woman selfishly is built to experience a far superior amount of orgasms of a variety incomprehensible to the man. All of the above doesn't even begin to touch on the emotional and social benefits of polyamorous relationships, unless you are of the opinion that sex is the only reason for a relationship or you for some reason believe that the only form of poly is for everybody involved to have sex together every time. In fact, in many poly relationships, threesomes and moresomes never even come into play in the bedroom. note: Playing the Devil's advocate here, i would far prefer to have sex with a woman than a man; i believe that women are sexually superior... My real complaint was in your term "sexual machine" and the statement that poly is not a valid option. We shall now return to your regularly scheduled funniness, sorry to segue into the serious.

GYPZYQUEEN -> RE: Fairy (7/5/2009 10:30:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VeryNastyDom This is why poly has its charms. He could have asked to trade his 60 year old wife for two 30 year olds, or if his heart was still in good shape, he could go for three 20 year olds. Why would a man want to disappoint 3 women? GQ

NightTigress -> RE: Fairy (7/5/2009 10:43:54 PM)
Who would have thought this joke would get so serious?

LotusSong -> RE: Fairy (7/6/2009 7:04:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: NightTigress Who would have thought this joke would get so serious? I dunno.. I think the guys getting all definsive is pretty funny [:D]

SteelofUtah -> RE: Fairy (7/6/2009 7:11:25 PM)
Not Defensive just offering a differeing Opinion. It would be akin to someone saying .... All women are designed for the purpose of having children .... thus this is a womans purpose. Don't you think people would argue the point? To say that Men are inferior to women sexually due to nothing more than ability to take Cock seems a strange way to determine that I simply offered the Opposing Philosophy. Steel

darchChylde -> RE: Fairy (7/7/2009 12:03:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LotusSong quote: ORIGINAL: NightTigress Who would have thought this joke would get so serious? I dunno.. I think the guys getting all definsive is pretty funny [:D] Defensive? Then refute my logic.

Saratov -> RE: Fairy (7/7/2009 5:58:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: NightTigress Who would have thought this joke would get so serious? Oh, come on NT, I know you're not new here..... [8\|]

Saratov -> RE: Fairy (7/7/2009 6:02:18 AM)
I think we may have some folks right here in CM who might dispute that all fairies are female. Well, at least that they are in female bodies. [sm=rofl.gif]

Tals -> RE: Fairy (7/7/2009 8:37:02 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Saratov I think we may have some folks right here in CM who might dispute that all fairies are female. Well, at least that they are in female bodies. [sm=rofl.gif] Well, in fact, if you go back through many old cultures.......oh that's not what you meant.

NightTigress -> RE: Fairy (7/7/2009 9:44:09 PM)
quote: Oh, come on NT, I know you're not new here..... quote: ORIGINAL: Saratov quote: ORIGINAL: NightTigress Who would have thought this joke would get so serious? Oh, come on NT, I know you're not new here..... [8\|] Touche

MStephen -> RE: Fairy (7/8/2009 6:33:53 AM)
Women can be the superior sexual machine. I have no problem with that. After all... Every machine requires the right Man (for sake of argument) to operate it properly and make it run more efficiently. To keep it well lubricated... to operate it's sensitive controls... to push the right buttons at the right time... to keep it humming... to bind it with good rope or chain and flog it's lovely ass while forcing it to... oh... um... achem... sry... I seem to have jumped the analogy.

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

4.492188E-02