FirmhandKY
Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda quote:
ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY quote:
ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda ... I'm just responding to Firm's statement that there's no evidence your sources are right-wing blogs. He said something to the effect that "there's little evidence (you guys) are getting your information from right wing blogs", and I said that's what you were quoting. Bull hockey, Panda. That's not even close to what I said, and it's in plain as day in my post, easy to actually quote and read. Really? Then let's do that. I said - quote:
If you spend a lot of time browsing wacko conservative blogs like the one Heretic posted, you're probably going to see a lot of focus on poor Sarah and how persecuted she is .Here's what you said - quote:
You are assuming facts not in evidence about either my or Heretics reading habits. Can you explain how the statement - quote:
He said something to the effect that "there's little evidence (you guys) are getting your information from right wing blogs" ...is "not even close to what you said?" I'm not sure if I can make the distinction any clearer to you. Perhaps this is a case where our words and what is in our minds differ enough that we aren't even arguing the same point. What you actually said was: I think it's more a measure of the sources you read. If you spend a lot of time browsing wacko conservative blogs like the one Heretic posted, This comment - to me - indicated that both Heretic and I read only confirmatory material and therefore miss actual, newsworthy material on subjects that might shed light on the reasons that Palin is so hated. But (while I can't speak for Heretic, although I believe it likely true), I read quite widely in general news sources, on "left" leaning sources and blogs, but actually only on a few "right" leaning blogs. As well, I read books, magazines and newspapers (is "The Atlantic" or the Atlanta Journal Constitution too "right wing wacko conservative" for you?) So, your assumption that we confine ourselves to only "wacko conservative blogs" is very much incorrect. My statement was only that I believed you were not correct in your appreciation of our reading habits: You are assuming facts not in evidence about either my or Heretics reading habits. You then say: Considering such blogs are the only sources Heretic cites, and considering that your primary role in this thread has been to support his position (without citing any sources of your own), I'd say there is, indeed, sufficient evidence to support my assumption. Which is an interesting way to again attempt to undermine our arguments or positions without actually using insulting words. Your intent was clear, however. So ... truthfully, I'm not sure why this particular exchange has got your bee in a bonnet. I wasn't particularly offended, nor did I attempt to make such a big deal about it. I know it's not true, and hopefully my words and analysis and sources speak for themselves. So I'm not sure why you wish to make such a big deal out of our reading habits. quote:
ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda quote:
ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY As I said before, you disappoint me. Normally, you make clear the differences between facts and opinion, but when it comes to anything "Palin" you seem to lose all coherence and logic. And you've disappointed me even more. I used to respect you as someone who was at least trying to argue from a position of intellectual honesty. There was a value in arguing with you, because to engage you meant that one had to examine their own position closely for internal flaws. Now it's just become tiresome. It's like having a bedtime argument with a child who insists that since you told him he could stay up until 9 PM, and it's not 9 PM yet in Hawaii, you should have specifically stated you meant 9 PM here in Oklahoma. It's not stimulating anymore, it's just irritating. And it's a complete waste of time. If, in the past, my comments and analysis lead you to do a deeper analysis of your positions, then I respectfully suggest that you do so as well, in this case. Firm
_____________________________
Some people are just idiots.
|