CreativeDominant -> RE: Opinions,please, on ethical behavior (7/24/2009 11:32:54 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze quote:
ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze Isn't that twisting the subject a bit and playing blame the victim? He left the mail open, that's like leaving a letter around OPEN, she did not hack his mailbox, and the fact is, he was exposed as a liar and a cheat. End of story! You know, I would not open the letter of my partner, no way, but would he leave an open letter laying around and the worlds "I love you" would jump to my face, I would have a look at it. Would you advocate closing your eyes to obvious signs of betrayal? Then most people would possibly tell her "Why didn't you see the warning signs!" But see...she DIDN'T just read the first opened mail, she kept on clicking OPEN and reading other mails. Blaming the victim...yanno, I have to wonder....why is it when someone has done something wrong, we move them into victim status because someone else did something else MORE wrong first? She's a grown human being, with choices and options available to her and her own code of ethics to follow. In her code of ethics, dishonesty and cheating are not O.K. but snooping beyond the proof you have with the first letter IS O.K.. That doesn't put her code of behavior/ethics down there to the same level as his...and few have said that it does... but neither is her behavior made right by his. I would have done the same thing! Out of selfprotection, if there is something wrong I want to go to the bottom of it. Now how about HE LEFT THE MAILS THERE FOR HER TO READ.... Actually, no he didn't. He left HIS computer on to HIS email account. She saw something in an email title that was on display and disturbed her so she clicked it open and read. Clicking on other emails was unnecessary...the first one gave her the proof she needed. As LaTigresse said, if the D/s and the genders were reversed, I can't help wondering if this would not be an entirely different sounding thread. Hell, I will even go so far as to say leave the D/s out of it entirely and just reverse the genders. quote:
Sorry, but if I leave my car unlocked and somebody takes my handbag, I got myself to blame. No argument here BUT you would also have the criminal to blame. And do you honestly think the police could get away with telling you "Sorry...you left your car unlocked therefore the criminal is blameless?" Yeah...right.quote:
Why is everybody so keen to blame her for acting in her own best interest? Would any of us not have done the same? Because too many times that line..."I was acting in my own self-interest" can be used to cover a variety of wrong-doings. "I cheated on my wife because she won't give me sex and I am a normal healthy human being who did not want to rape his wife...so I found it elsewhere in my own best interest AND, when you stop to think about it, hers" "I cheated on my taxes because I needed the money to fund my business...everybody does it...you have to look out for number one when you are in business, you know?"
|
|
|
|