|
jamesthehumanrug -> RE: The Active and Passive Roles of a slave: How do We/we Manage Them Together? (2/19/2006 4:13:20 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DarkdesiresNYC
The Active and Passive Roles of a slave: How do We/we Manage Them Together?
Consensual slaves derive a significant amount of security and reward from being directly supervised by their Masters. Because it is very positive for both Master and slave to share in intimate and complementary forms of service, this interdependence constitutes the basis of the dynamic in many Master/slave relationships. But on occasions where a slave is intended to make decisions on her own, as a representative of her Master’s wishes, a number of potential roadblocks may come into play. For example, if she is not used to making decisions on her own, she may believe herself inadequate to make substantial choice or take independent action. It follows then that she may experience tremendous fear, frustration and anxiety about making wrong judgments in situations that require her to exhibit self-control; that is, any kind of control otherwise typically exercised by her Owner. A great danger is that the slave’s fear of failure may lead to an emotional blockage that makes the learning of self-control difficult and will hinder her personal development.
The rest of the essay is available as a PDF file here:
http://www.geocities.com/eric_pride/ActivePassive-DRAFT.pdf
All your comments welcome.
darkdesires goddess,
greetings
it's complimentary relationships/the more dominant; the more submissive requirements ,in a dual relationship ,however ,
i find, in personality and, attraction, that:equal amounts of dominance submissive behavior exsists in both top and bottom.
the top is submissive out of bed in their world somewhat, and comprimizes, till they can "go to bed", so to speak;likewise:so does the well matched bottom ;who ,maybe top in the world, in many superior ways ,but ,therefore has equal ,that inferior a position in bed...in other words;
they have to be equal in dominance and submissive behaviors on both ends of the scale in the same person,but,have the equal polar proportion,in dominance ,and submissive , to each other...
each is only then able,to act out their proprotionate sides, but , polar opposites,to interact,and,be satisfied,or it wont work.
equal but opposite;understand?and the matter of choice becomes a rather natural attraction and automatic-interplay....
a real god cant be satisfied ,with a slave that isnt a god
understand?
-it takes the same level of dominance, in a flamboyant personality ,to serve an arrogant huge top ,or flamboyant star....
so the "bottom"behavior
has to be the least,
to serve the most dominant ego(god ,or the like) ,
and ,yet ,
this ,also means such a- slave- sticks out ,esp.amoung ,other slaves , by comparison ,as "dominant" ,but ,also ,as the least / where such a slave appears dominant in many ways;and is accused of giving off "mixed signals;"and yet behaves as the bottom of bottoms
******************************************
something hard ,to go,into ,now....
but, ie:,elvis,
needs
an equally dominant personality, in a slave;
and ,elvis ,
exudes dominance, and, presence ,to take, over a room,yet elvis had no freedom;yeilding more than anyone else to his world,
but, so would his complimentary(equal)slave,
and the like ,and so on....
i maybe, off the mark, to what you are saying ,but ,it's quite- pert, to your quote ,in many major ways.
if you dont understand
nevermind.
|
|
|
|
