RE: Its all in the mind (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


NihilusZero -> RE: Its all in the mind (7/23/2009 7:30:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: daintydimples

I never even implied that someone could "magically" get inside my head. I would find anyone inferring that they could highly condescending. Which is frankly how I find your response; you made many assumptions there. That I "feel" someone has a stronger will than my own and am attracted to that does not mean I jump into a relationship expecting everything to "magically" work out. Quite the contrary in fact.

It wasn't meant to be condescending. It also wasn't personal to your persona, just to the words you chose.

Most humans want an element of magic in their relationships. It's normal. It's what often makes for the fondest memories. I made no inference about what you specifically think about relationships other than pointing out that it's a positive thing for all of us to realize how powerful that feeling of a 'perfect fit' at any moment can be in swaying our feelings one way or another. That's it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: daintydimples

In my always strong opinion, for a Dominate to get inside a sub's head, on some level at least, she has to want him there.

So now, it is on the sub, contrary to your comment here?

quote:

ORIGINAL: daintydimples

If a sub is totally unreadable, you have failed to get inside her head. That's your bad.


Or maybe it's just a balance of chemistry. Something, yet again, aided by the elements that feed our concepts of chemistry (a big one being the proclivity for the 'magic moments' to happen). And, to be fair, the more often such moments happen probably is an indication of a lot of unknown and unspoken common ground.




Prinsexx -> RE: Its all in the mind (7/23/2009 7:31:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero


If those are some of the qualities a sub would want in a partner, then surely it makes sense for that to be considered exceedingly attractive. But, is the sexiness of this "he knew what I needed without knowing!" phenomenon really pervasive enough that some are prone to ditch the entire question of whether they feel compatibility or not based on it alone?


No it is not pervasive enough in my experience to sustain a relationship. I fell so in love with a switch guy once. He was so psychologically matched to me it was glorious. We could chat, phone, write to each other, sit and talk and the psychological closeness was capable of triggering orgasm within me without touch. As a switch he was one of the very few males I have felt drawn to domme. BUT we were sexually incompatible.
He came back at me more than once to get back into relationship. But I knew I would fuck him over. It's difficult to remain friends even when a guy realises the score.




Drakontos -> RE: Its all in the mind (7/23/2009 7:35:58 AM)

quote:

To what extent do you think that it is intent rather than action that creates power exchange?

zaphira thinks that for her relationship, it is 90% intent and 10% action. Mainly because Master and zaphira do not have the 'typical' physical relationship that most enjoy. We do not scene/play, and we do not have sex. Ours is purely a relationship based solely on zaphira's service to him and his home.

So, for zaphira; it's all about the intent and not so much the actions.




BitaTruble -> RE: Its all in the mind (7/23/2009 7:37:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero
If those are some of the qualities a sub would want in a partner, then surely it makes sense for that to be considered exceedingly attractive. But, is the sexiness of this "he knew what I needed without knowing!" phenomenon really pervasive enough that some are prone to ditch the entire question of whether they feel compatibility or not based on it alone?


Deal breakers are deal breakers, so yes, some absolutely will ditch a relationship for that reason. What the deal breakers are really isn't the question. If you can't live with 'it' (or without it) and be still happy, then it's probably best to move on. It could be smoking, drinking, marriage, children or a failure to observe (which is really what the appearance of being telepathic is all about!) I've never met anyone who was actually telepathic, but I know a plethora of people who are incredibly observant and all other things being equal, they make pretty good partners which ever side of the leash they are on or even if there is no leash.




NihilusZero -> RE: Its all in the mind (7/23/2009 7:41:13 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitaTruble

but I know a plethora of people who are incredibly observant and all other things being equal, they make pretty good partners which ever side of the leash they are on or even if there is no leash.

I guess it should be said that my use of the word "telepathy" is one used without any belief in the metaphysical ability. What I was alluding to is the ability to (by normal means) give the impression of some sort of telepathy (accidentally or not). And...that exactly makes your point about the people naturally good at doing it being good partners. I suppose it is essentially a skill set, just like any other. It just happens to be a skill set that induces moments of emotional euphoria, which can further attract a partner to you.




daintydimples -> RE: Its all in the mind (7/23/2009 8:00:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

quote:

ORIGINAL: daintydimples

I never even implied that someone could "magically" get inside my head. I would find anyone inferring that they could highly condescending. Which is frankly how I find your response; you made many assumptions there. That I "feel" someone has a stronger will than my own and am attracted to that does not mean I jump into a relationship expecting everything to "magically" work out. Quite the contrary in fact.

It wasn't meant to be condescending. It also wasn't personal to your persona, just to the words you chose.

Most humans want an element of magic in their relationships. It's normal. It's what often makes for the fondest memories. I made no inference about what you specifically think about relationships other than pointing out that it's a positive thing for all of us to realize how powerful that feeling of a 'perfect fit' at any moment can be in swaying our feelings one way or another. That's it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: daintydimples

In my always strong opinion, for a Dominate to get inside a sub's head, on some level at least, she has to want him there.

So now, it is on the sub, contrary to your comment here?

quote:

ORIGINAL: daintydimples

If a sub is totally unreadable, you have failed to get inside her head. That's your bad.


Or maybe it's just a balance of chemistry. Something, yet again, aided by the elements that feed our concepts of chemistry (a big one being the proclivity for the 'magic moments' to happen). And, to be fair, the more often such moments happen probably is an indication of a lot of unknown and unspoken common ground.


My point was that if a dominant finds someone "totally unreadable" he has either failed to get to know her or failed to engender the desire in her to open up to him. And if that is the case, why is he proceeding? I think he followed that up with an important observation...which was he finds a sub who is  "totally readable" boring. Which is perhaps, another thread.

As to your point, I agree with this statement: "it's a positive thing for all of us to realize how powerful that feeling of a 'perfect fit' at any moment can be in swaying our feelings one way or another."

Also agree with this: "Or maybe it's just a balance of chemistry.  . . . And, to be fair, the more often such moments happen probably is an indication of a lot of unknown and unspoken common ground." 

This "feeling" as it were is called sexual selection. We are often attracted to people without really being able to define how or why. I strongly believe that two people feel that chemical reaction for a reason. Does this make them magically compatible? Not just no, but hell no.  I do think, however, you should take a long hard look at why you are attracted to who you are attracted to. Though I see that powerful chemical feeling as essential to a successful relationship, it's a starting point, not a substitute.




LillyoftheVally -> RE: Its all in the mind (7/23/2009 8:05:37 AM)

Being readable isnt about being psycic, its about paying attention




NihilusZero -> RE: Its all in the mind (7/23/2009 8:06:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: daintydimples

My point was that if a dominant finds someone "totally unreadable" he has either failed to get to know her or failed to engender the desire in her to open up to him. And if that is the case, why is he proceeding? I think he followed that up with an important observation...which was he finds a sub who is  "totally readable" boring. Which is perhaps, another thread.

I think matters of chemistry, like this, are based on mutual effort and mutual courtship. But that, along with what you mentioned, probably does belong in another thread.

quote:

ORIGINAL: daintydimples

As to your point, I agree with this statement: "it's a positive thing for all of us to realize how powerful that feeling of a 'perfect fit' at any moment can be in swaying our feelings one way or another."

Also agree with this: "Or maybe it's just a balance of chemistry.  . . . And, to be fair, the more often such moments happen probably is an indication of a lot of unknown and unspoken common ground." 

This "feeling" as it were is called sexual selection. We are often attracted to people without really being able to define how or why.

Which sucks. I've been trying to more carefully dissect those intangibles for myself. But, I'm getting off on a tangent...

quote:

ORIGINAL: daintydimples

I strongly believe that two people feel that chemical reaction for a reason. Does this make them magically compatible? Not just no, but hell no.

Well, it could. But I think that (like other chances of compatibility) is pretty much based on luck.

quote:

ORIGINAL: daintydimples

I do think, however, you should take a long hard look at why you are attracted to who you are attracted to. Though I see that powerful chemical feeling as essential to a successful relationship, it's a starting point, not a substitute.

Agreed.




NihilusZero -> RE: Its all in the mind (7/23/2009 8:08:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LillyoftheVally

Being readable isnt about being psycic, its about paying attention

The ability to appear psychic is directly tied to paying attention. [;)]




LillyoftheVally -> RE: Its all in the mind (7/23/2009 8:14:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

quote:

ORIGINAL: LillyoftheVally

Being readable isnt about being psycic, its about paying attention

The ability to appear psychic is directly tied to paying attention. [;)]




Derren Brown *swoon*




TreasureKY -> RE: Its all in the mind (7/23/2009 8:20:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

This is an interesting topic as the prevailing underlying point appears to be the 'energy' of an interaction where the dominant is essentially focused on himself and how, through that, the sub feels there is a genuine dominance being displayed.

I think excerpts like these:
quote:

ORIGINAL: TreasureKY

If a guy intended to come across as dominant, but his actions reflected that he was only doing so in order to please me and/or win my affection (or because he thought he was supposed to), then there's no "power exchange" and I'm not interested.

Are a strange tightrope walk because it's saying that if the Dom does something to please the sub, the power exchange isn't there....all the while the entire point of the thread being that many subs want a self-motivated Dom, so even in that case he'd still be giving them what they seek.

I think most of this will fall under the human habit of wanting things to "just fit magically" in our intimate reactions with our partners. We'd want them to pick our our favorite restaurant to eat out at without knowing what it was. And while I'd agree that there is something about that to desire, I think it bears being vigilant to the fact that we can tend to be biased that way in order to properly weigh situations so we're not making unrealistic expectations because our partner isn't always seemingly telepathic.


I mostly agree with what you are saying... it can be a tightrope... but I think there are a lot of variables in there. 

First, in what I wrote, I had more in mind the type of guy who finds out you are into submission and, though he's never had an interest in dominating and has never been one to be thought of as a dominant, he tries to behave dominantly in order to please you or to woo you.  Note that I wrote carefully "a guy" (not a dom) and I emphasized the words "intended" and "only".  I fully expect that a guy like this will quickly tire of playing at being dominant and any dominant behavior (as well as intent) will disappear once he has gotten what he wanted or becomes bored.

That aside, I don't feel that a dominant doing something to please his submissive... or giving his submissive's desires attention... automatically negates the "power exchange".   I do think, though, that balance matters... if it tips too far in favor of the submissive and the focus becomes pleasing the submissive without regard to the dominant's personal desires, then yeah... I'd have a problem with that.

As far as wanting things to "magically fit", I do feel there is a possibility for unreasonable or unrealistic expectations.  What is unrealistic and unreasonable could easily be debated, though.

I personally feel that if you really care about someone, you care about their physical and emotional well-being.  The more you care, the more you pay attention to their needs and desires.  If a dominant can't remember off-hand comments that his submissive says like, "oooohhh, I love this restaurant" or notice the wrinkled nose and frown when Thai cuisine is suggested, then it would seem to me that he doesn't care enough about what his submissive's preferences are.  If a dominant can't be bothered to note what makes his submissive squeal with delight or groan in dismay, then I don't consider him suitable for a caring relationship.  If a dominant says he's interested in his submissive being pleased... at least occasionally... how hard is it to observe, remember, or even ask?

I do recognize that there can be great differences in how men and women think, though.  And of course, it greatly depends upon what kind of relationship you are looking for. 

Like everything else, communication is key.




NihilusZero -> RE: Its all in the mind (7/23/2009 8:25:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LillyoftheVally

Derren Brown *swoon*

80 points!

Totally bad-ass reference!!




NihilusZero -> RE: Its all in the mind (7/23/2009 8:32:16 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TreasureKY

First, in what I wrote, I had more in mind the type of guy who finds out you are into submission and, though he's never had an interest in dominating and has never been one to be thought of as a dominant, he tries to behave dominantly in order to please you or to woo you.  Note that I wrote carefully "a guy" (not a dom) and I emphasized the words "intended" and "only".  I fully expect that a guy like this will quickly tire of playing at being dominant and any dominant behavior (as well as intent) will disappear once he has gotten what he wanted or becomes bored.

That aside, I don't feel that a dominant doing something to please his submissive... or giving his submissive's desires attention... automatically negates the "power exchange".   I do think, though, that balance matters... if it tips too far in favor of the submissive and the focus becomes pleasing the submissive without regard to the dominant's personal desires, then yeah... I'd have a problem with that.

Many commentaries I've seen by subs echo your sentiments here. It's actually an interesting dynamic I've had to get to understand because I have a big caretaking streak wrapped up into my style of dominance (and in other topics). So, it can be a daunting task for a Dom to find the careful balance between showing enough focus on his sub while still relating the idea that he is leading the situation to an end of his desire.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TreasureKY

As far as wanting things to "magically fit", I do feel there is a possibility for unreasonable or unrealistic expectations.  What is unrealistic and unreasonable could easily be debated, though.

I personally feel that if you really care about someone, you care about their physical and emotional well-being.  The more you care, the more you pay attention to their needs and desires.  If a dominant can't remember off-hand comments that his submissive says like, "oooohhh, I love this restaurant" or notice the wrinkled nose and frown when Thai cuisine is suggested, then it would seem to me that he doesn't care enough about what his submissive's preferences are.

*sigh*

My memory sucks sometimes. Seriously. I barely remember the ages of my sisters and parents. It can be pretty bad. Maybe if I had a sub who constantly kept me reminded of such things... [:D]

quote:

ORIGINAL: TreasureKY

If a dominant can't be bothered to note what makes his submissive squeal with delight or groan in dismay, then I don't consider him suitable for a caring relationship.  If a dominant says he's interested in his submissive being pleased... at least occasionally... how hard is it to observe, remember, or even ask?

Fair enough. *nod*

quote:

ORIGINAL: TreasureKY

Like everything else, communication is key.

10 points.




LillyoftheVally -> RE: Its all in the mind (7/23/2009 8:34:33 AM)

80 Points! Why do I feel unnaturally proud?




SimplyMichael -> RE: Its all in the mind (7/23/2009 8:35:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Prinsexx

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19

I was with someone who was a Top but did not dominate. I did feel that something was missing and topping from the bottom was unsatisfying.Still, I have never got everything I want in relationships so I accepted it. I think I am more relationship based than purely BDSM based. Although at this point, I am not sure how I would function in the strictly vanilla world.

Dear luscious
With regard to not getting everything one wants in a relationship.... me too.
But then again there is a theory that we are the results of our communication. So, as I can only speak for me, I absolutely realise that I have always 'settled'. Huge breakthrough for me. I have settled for component parts of what I want.
Now I have done this for various reasons. First I have to say was inexperience and not knowing exactly what I wanted from an other-than-vanilla, Secondly I thought I had to 'put up' with less because as a submissive I could not ask for what I wanted. Third, I found it, still find it near impossible to ask for what I want.
So: my solution. Stick out for what I want. Refuse to enter into a relationship with anyone that is less than what I want. And then be brave, feel worthy, communicate when asked, what it is that I want.
Then there is very little opportunity for there to be a split between 'mind' and 'body' domination.
Intent is one thing. But putting intention into practice is everything no matter which side of the kneel one is.




Does a happy dance and feels strangely turned on!  WOW, just WOW.  You should be proud as hell woman for getting to this point.




SimplyMichael -> RE: Its all in the mind (7/23/2009 8:37:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

This is an interesting topic as the prevailing underlying point appears to be the 'energy' of an interaction where the dominant is essentially focused on himself and how, through that, the sub feels there is a genuine dominance being displayed.

I think excerpts like these:
quote:

ORIGINAL: TreasureKY

If a guy intended to come across as dominant, but his actions reflected that he was only doing so in order to please me and/or win my affection (or because he thought he was supposed to), then there's no "power exchange" and I'm not interested.

Are a strange tightrope walk because it's saying that if the Dom does something to please the sub, the power exchange isn't there....all the while the entire point of the thread being that many subs want a self-motivated Dom, so even in that case he'd still be giving them what they seek.

I think most of this will fall under the human habit of wanting things to "just fit magically" in our intimate reactions with our partners. We'd want them to pick our our favorite restaurant to eat out at without knowing what it was. And while I'd agree that there is something about that to desire, I think it bears being vigilant to the fact that we can tend to be biased that way in order to properly weigh situations so we're not making unrealistic expectations because our partner isn't always seemingly telepathic.


Oh god I hate to do this but 10 points!




RCdc -> RE: Its all in the mind (7/23/2009 8:38:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LillyoftheVally

80 Points! Why do I feel unnaturally proud?


*mumblesomethingaboutonlygetting20pointstheotherdayandfeelscheated*
 
the.dark. 




Missokyst -> RE: Its all in the mind (7/23/2009 8:40:14 AM)

lol we don't even do that!  The last man between my legs was the doctor for my annual pelvic exam.  Sex has to mean something for me, it is what connects me to another person, which I will only allow if I think it might have a chance of developing further.  And that means all sex, oral, anal, vaginal.. or even stimulating the naughty bits.
Kyst
quote:

ORIGINAL: daintydimples
When I was (much) younger, I used to go the fuck buddy route. These days if sex doesn't mean something, I just can't be bothered.




NihilusZero -> RE: Its all in the mind (7/23/2009 8:42:00 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Darcyandthedark

quote:

ORIGINAL: LillyoftheVally

80 Points! Why do I feel unnaturally proud?


*mumblesomethingaboutonlygetting20pointstheotherdayandfeelscheated*

the.dark. 

But it was a Derren Brown reference!!

*sigh*

*accepts being guilt tripped into giving dark an extra 10 points*

(partial fib as she's earned it plenty...but we'll just say it's for the avatar [;)])




NihilusZero -> RE: Its all in the mind (7/23/2009 8:43:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LillyoftheVally

80 Points! Why do I feel unnaturally proud?

Derren Brown rocks!

*calmly tries to keep himself from further derailing the thread...sheepish grin*




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875