willbeurdaddy
Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY quote:
ORIGINAL: slvemike4u quote:
ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY quote:
ORIGINAL: slvemike4u In that case Firm,where is your denunciation of Willbeur's obvious partisan slant on this thread(not to mention his long history of such behavior)? What partisan slant?  How "long" is willbur's history, exactly? Firm Well let see...."corrupt Dem machine" And as far as I'm concerned his history is waaay too long and waay too apparent. It must be a "perception" problem that leads you not to see this.....but I will resist the urge to label you or anyone a "hypocrite" despite your silence. Hmmm, "machine politics" has a pretty long history in New Jersey. In this case in particular, made of Democrats - so yes, "corrupt Dem machine" (while you may not like it) certainly is an acceptable descriptive phrase for this particular event. It's not a perception problem on my part, in not attacking willbur when I see him post. He tends to sometimes be short in his posts, and sometimes gets involved in the tit-for-tat, but I see him vilified for almost anything he posts, and absolutely nothing but snide and snarky remarks from some on "your side" who would rather trash his reputation and engage in ad hominen attacks rather than attempt to engage him productively. He seems to hold up well, and I think that just enrages some even more. As well, there is always a large posse from the left who is willing to engage and dispute anything he says, which kind of makes any comments to dispute or clarify anything he may say from "the right" like piling on. Not necessary, nor productive. On the other hand, when people such as Mars post ... the piling on is usually in congratulation in how perceptive he is. Most of the "right" posters pretty much ignore him, on the concept that his words of hatred speak more about him than they do about Republicans he so dearly loves to hate. Firm Feel free to "pile on". If something I posit is disputed by reasonable people then Im more than happy to respond in more detail. WRT to less reasoned attacks I try to descend into the maelstrom of semantics only once. There is no question that on this site and every other political board Ive seen, the liberals think that facts can be arbited by majority rule, so "piling on" is de rigeur when they cant attack substance.
|