FirmhandKY
Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote:
ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY That's your opinion. So far, no competent legal authority agrees with you. Firm You mean it's just me? I feel so lonely. RASUL et al. v. BUSH, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, et al., 542 Boumediene v. Bush, U.S. Supreme Court Case Summary & Oral Argument American Civil Liberties Union : Office of Legal Counsel Memos Should I keep going? Because there are plenty more. Should I keep going? Because there are plenty more. Sure. Except this time, could they relate to the specific questions and points you raised? I'll say that the first link is tangentially related, to your second point, although I suspect you do not understand how, and how not. Your second link leads nowhere currently (something wrong with the website, I suspect), and the third link is to a listing of the ACLU's "Bush Memo's", proving nothing. However, simply for the sake of furthering the discussion, I'll concede - for the moment - your point two. We can get back to it later. How about the other two points? 1. Soooo, did you notice that thing about a historic change in U.S. policy that allowed a preemptive war? 3. How about when the law was twisted to the point that torture became "harsh interrogation"? Which competent legal authority have found these "illegal"? Firm
_____________________________
Some people are just idiots.
|