sravaka -> RE: What attracts also repels? (7/29/2009 10:27:07 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant Sure there are groups of submissives also. I've not sat down and taken the time to divide them up but I can give you some examples. Let's see if anyone here knows submissives of this nature. 1. The "I am a submissive and I am especially submissive to you but my work requires me to be dominant in nature so I will not be able to go into submissive mode automatically when I come home". Many of these types want you to understand and accept this. Funny but when they get to work, are they allowed that same latitude of time before their "work dominance" kicks in or does their boss expect them to come to work ready to go? 2. The "I am fully competent at work and social settings submissive but my brain just won't work when Master/Mistress tells me to do something hard". These are the submissives who handle extremely complex matters at work and who take a great deal of pride in being able to do so (and rightfully so) and yet, when a task is laid out for them...be it simple or complex (although oddly enough, many times it is the most simple task/protocol/ritual that throws them)...they have to have it explained from many angles and then will still question the why and how of it. 3. The "My last relationship left me feeling lonely and vulnerable and inadequate so I need someone to show me that I am indeed a worthy submissive and a good person submissives". These are the ones who take care and kindness and understanding and a willingness to listen and the ability to build their self-esteem again. While some of these end up in love with the dominant who thought there was a gem of a submissive there, sadly many of them end up back with the former dominant who tore them down in the first place "because he's changed and I didn't realize it until he changed but I'm still in love with him" OR they are grateful to the dominant who picked them up and rebuilt them but "yanno, I've realized I need a bit of the asshole and you are just too nice, Sir/Ma'am". Ok... re: #3, I can only say, ouch. Do reasonable people really say this?? "I need a bit of the asshole"? (or equivalent, even?) But re: nos. 1-2.... these puzzle me exceedingly, and have done so for quite a while. So... with apologies to Prinsexx for abusing her thread, I will attempt to inquire.... Is it really a matter of switching on and off? (#1) I swear, I've never felt this. Or, ok, maybe sometimes I'm required to be serious and deferential when (to me) amusing, pointy little comments are intruding into my brain... but this seems to be a different problem. What you (CreativeDominant) describe reminds me of when silly online interlocutors say, "Tell me about your submissive side." Side? The left, the right, the front, the back?? I don't have sides. I'm a whole. I don't leave part of myself behind when crossing work/home thresholds in either direction. I just decide which skills and tendencies are most relevant to a particular situation, and let them have their way, or pull them into service, or let them be compelled, as needed. (It's often very effective to be deferential and service-oriented at work, even when one is ostensibly in charge... them what don't know may even perceive it as being dominant/controlling, when really it's just service to a different cause.) Re: your #2... I can understand difficulties about whys and hows, up to a point. How becomes a thing for perfectionists, e.g. (and there are many of these among smartchicks). Why is a thing for those of us who are pathologically curious, or who find in the whys a way to get a different perspective on our dominants, how they think, what they value. But, again... checking your brain at the door independently just sounds like laziness. Or some conflict about one's "sides". Is that it? How hopeless it seems, if there are all these fucked up "types" on both sides of the slash!
|
|
|
|