HeavansKeeper
Posts: 1254
Joined: 5/14/2007 Status: offline
|
I think financial domination has gotten a bad rep over the years. It's not only 19 year old girls who realize horny 50 year old men will shell out big bucks for used panties and insults. Let it suffice to say, I'm not into that. Financial domination also includes a dominant taking control of the finances of the submissive. S-type works, all the money goes to the dominant, they live happily together with the dominant making the fiscal actions. This extra level to submission can be very rewarding. I identify with the OP... I'm also 23 and off put by the idea of "Give my money, Cash Pig!" As I see it, you're wealthy enough to afford buying Miss stuff/giving her straight cash OR you're poor enough to not be able to afford it. If one has to sacrifice anything else in their life to dote upon their mistress, my opinion is that they're too poor to be doing it. By this, I don't see the allure from the bottom. Either the bottom shouldn't, or it doesn't matter if they do. "Different strokes" is sufficient for me. Proper financial domination, the sort Hagia describes, I can get behind. (Though personally, I feel it's essential to slavery that the slave always be able [including having the funds] to leave). Separate Bubble-Gum flavored girls who figured out credit cards can be swiped online from a woman who is willing to make you her cared for pet. My opinion on when to submit, financially: After you're married. Money is too important (to me) in this world to be treated recklessly.
_____________________________
The Loving Owner of HisHeavan ... You've waited your whole life for this moment...
|