Voodali
Posts: 255
Joined: 10/2/2007 Status: offline
|
This is an interesting question that I often ponder. In the BDSM group I frequent, there is a curious attitude that it is the Dom/me's responsibility to lead the entire group, and there is a hierarchy of Dom/mes based on experience (which makes sense). I found this quite uncomfortable upon joining because I was a complete novice to the group and had no clue what the hell was going on, and yet, in certain situation was expected to lead. Just because a person identifies as dominant, and wants to control one specific person (or more, depending on their leanings) does not mean they are adept or even suited to leading an entire group, and does not mean they should lead in every situation. Personally, I am far too apathetic to lead in some situations, and find it a pain in the ass to concern myself with every individual in the group, to try to make things run smoothly, to deal with attitudes, to take the success or failiure of the group upon myself. In a situation like a raid in a game, I might well delegate the responsibility and the pain in the ass to a sub. Good leadership is a form of service, and the best leaders serve the group. I would not be thrilled, however, if said sub tried to undermine my authority. That would quickly reduce my attraction to him, since I despise power struggles. I imagine many Dommes feel similarly.
|