CallaFirestormBW
Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008 Status: offline
|
I would have to say "something else"... specifically, a dynamic (definition: A characteristic or manner of an interaction; a behavior). I am one of the more rare folks (I think, at least from following the "BDSM community" [whether or not there -is- a community is a whole nother debate] for several decades) in that I don't necessarily believe that either dominance or submission is completely tied to the personality NOR completely unchangeable once the dynamic has been set. Different times, different situations, and different people may evoke a completely different response on the dominance-submission scale from a given individual. Admittedly, there are some folks who lean more heavily towards one end or the other as a general rule of their own nature, and some who move freely between the polar points on the scale, and that has to be considered as well. It is also possible (and I know this because I've lived it) to orient much more strongly towards -one- end of the spectrum, but to acquiesce to expressing the -other- end of the spectrum out of either preference or necessity. For me, this was four years as a comprehensive-authority-dynamic servant, which was a requirement to earning my crop in the household which I am part of. The House's dominant members participate "from the bottom up", and that's just the way it is, and I sucked it up for 4 difficult years because I -had- to, in order to achieve what I was determined to achieve (and yes, I acknowlege that those years were -fully- as difficult for the Keepers at the time as they were for me! *LOL*). With that in mind, I'd have to say that whatever an individual's prevalent orientation of dominance and submission is, it is more an internal process than anything we can 'give away' to anyone. Truthfully, what a submissive individual offers isn't hir 'submission'. What xhe offers is hir -obedience- and hir fealty, through the -behavior- of submission... and with the expected return of any subject, which is that, in return for hir obedience and fealty, xhe will be commanded, and/or protected -- and that hir essential needs will be attended to by the one(s) whose authority xhe has accepted. Notice, too, that in order for obedience to take place, the submissive individual must -accept- something... the authority of the dominant individual -- so there is no way that this can be a one-sided transfer of anything -- it is a dynamic, and that is really all that can be said about it, all romanticism aside. Dame Calla
_____________________________
*** Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!" "Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer
|