Venatrix
Posts: 2238
Joined: 11/28/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote:
ORIGINAL: Venatrix Most of the rest of you seem to be advocating a "why buy the milk when you can get the cow for free" attitude, and are getting bent out of shape because there are *some* "cows" who want paying. Actually, it was LadyHibiscus who said that I 'didn't need to pay the entrance fee'. The truth is, though, that I can't pay the entrance fee. Not because I'm broke (I'm not, fortunately), but because I'm not able to reconcile business mentality with romantic mentality. I cannot feel like I'm 'paying for love'. That runs true for my feelings about friends, too. Yes, PforH, we KNOW that. Nobody is arguing that point. I don't want a relationship that is based on money, either. But to say that women who want to be financial dominants are fakes is ridiculous, which is what many of the men posting on this thread imply. In fact, do a search for sub male profiles with the word "fake" in there, and in an overwhelming majority of cases, you will find that the "fake" is attached to some form of commentary deriding those women who wish to engage in financial domination. It's not my thing, but it doesn't make it any less valid as a form of domination than the way I dominate. Seriously, the posts on this thread have mirrored my life experience exactly: that there are a lot of submissive male jerks out there and a handful of really stellar ones, but that trying to find that handful of stellar ones isn't worth the slog through all the jerks. I'm just sick to death of the men who tell me that I need to be this way, that way, and the other way in order to be their dominant. I actually don't need to be anything other than what I already am. If that doesn't suit them, they are welcome to continue complaining about why they can't find a domina.
|