Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?)


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) - 2/23/2006 7:35:45 AM   
Chaingang


Posts: 1727
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline 		Link:
http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=22711

Because it's important that women be made to carry zygotes to term no matter what psychological, physical, financial, or social harm may result.

Go Team America!

Goddamned yahoos...

_____________________________

"Everything flows, nothing stands still." (Πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει) - Heraclitus
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) - 2/23/2006 10:05:01 AM   
dincubus


Posts: 231
Joined: 10/22/2005
From: South Dakota
Status: offline 		This has not been signed into law yet. it has been sent back to the legislature for changes just because of the fact that there is no provision for rape or incest. while i personally do not agree with abortion, i do believe that it is the right of the woman to choose. i do not believe that it is the government's place to push into one's personal rights to this degree.

and i do resemble that remark about yahoos.. as i live in south dakota
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaingang

Link:
http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=22711

Because it's important that women be made to carry zygotes to term no matter what psychological, physical, financial, or social harm may result.

Go Team America!

Goddamned yahoos...


(in reply to Chaingang)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) - 2/23/2006 10:33:41 AM   
thetammyjo


Posts: 6322
Joined: 9/8/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dincubus

This has not been signed into law yet. it has been sent back to the legislature for changes just because of the fact that there is no provision for rape or incest. while i personally do not agree with abortion, i do believe that it is the right of the woman to choose. i do not believe that it is the government's place to push into one's personal rights to this degree.

and i do resemble that remark about yahoos.. as i live in south dakota
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaingang

Link:
http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=22711

Because it's important that women be made to carry zygotes to term no matter what psychological, physical, financial, or social harm may result.

Go Team America!

Goddamned yahoos...




My husband is from South Dakota and his parents still live there. They have no freaking idea what is going on in this state since the 2004 elections. They said the senatorial race was horrible.

I'm betting though that the law being proposed either way doesn't really have a concern with unwanted pregnacies or women. I mean, does it fund sex education and free birth control and information about how you can do things other than intercourse to get off? All of these might reduce the rate of abortions.

Or course these would also interest self-awareness, empowerment, and general happiness and we wouldn't want that now would we? What "God" say about those horrible things?

_____________________________

Love, Peace, Hugs, Kisses, Whips & Chains,

TammyJo

Check out my website at http://www.thetammyjo.com Or www.tammyjoeckhart.com

And my LJ where I post fiction in progress if you "friend" me at http://thetammyjo.livejournal.com/

(in reply to dincubus)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) - 2/23/2006 10:43:30 AM   
fergus


Posts: 1110
Joined: 6/22/2005
Status: offline 		*whew* glad this is happening in South Dakota and not in the United States!

*sigh* This will never get through, even if it does, it is unconstitutional on a federal level.

fergus

(in reply to thetammyjo)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) - 2/23/2006 12:00:25 PM   
JohnWarren


Posts: 3807
Joined: 3/18/2005
From: Delray Beach, FL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fergus

*whew* glad this is happening in South Dakota and not in the United States!

*sigh* This will never get through, even if it does, it is unconstitutional on a federal level.

fergus


Don't bet on it. There are some Supremes like Scalia who are drooling to get such a case before them. I'll bet he's already got his "decision" typed up. The court has changed a lot in the last year or so.


_____________________________

www.lovingdominant.org

(in reply to fergus)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) - 2/23/2006 12:04:35 PM   
fergus


Posts: 1110
Joined: 6/22/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnWarren


quote:

ORIGINAL: fergus

*whew* glad this is happening in South Dakota and not in the United States!

*sigh* This will never get through, even if it does, it is unconstitutional on a federal level.

fergus


Don't bet on it. There are some Supremes like Scalia who are drooling to get such a case before them. I'll bet he's already got his "decision" typed up. The court has changed a lot in the last year or so.



True John,

Though I am unhappy with EITHER side! SC gets too liberal? We end up with that assinine Eminent Domain ruling. They get too conservative? We end up with a stripping of our OTHER liberties.

What ever happened to good, ol' reasonable centrists?

fergus

(in reply to JohnWarren)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) - 2/23/2006 12:12:02 PM   
Chaingang


Posts: 1727
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline 		This is precisely why it is important to remember that only true purposes of government are to protect the rights of natural born persons and provide a common defense. Period.

Everything else is a special interest issue and needs to be weighed carefully against serving the public good.

_____________________________

"Everything flows, nothing stands still." (Πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει) - Heraclitus

(in reply to fergus)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) - 2/23/2006 12:12:51 PM   
dincubus


Posts: 231
Joined: 10/22/2005
From: South Dakota
Status: offline 		This is one case that i wish might have come up while i was in my constitutional law course. it would have been wonderful for debate.
But alas, i fear you are right. it shall be a horrid day when the inevitable happens.
quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnWarren


quote:

ORIGINAL: fergus

*whew* glad this is happening in South Dakota and not in the United States!

*sigh* This will never get through, even if it does, it is unconstitutional on a federal level.

fergus


Don't bet on it. There are some Supremes like Scalia who are drooling to get such a case before them. I'll bet he's already got his "decision" typed up. The court has changed a lot in the last year or so.



(in reply to JohnWarren)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) - 2/23/2006 12:33:39 PM   
JohnWarren


Posts: 3807
Joined: 3/18/2005
From: Delray Beach, FL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fergus
What ever happened to good, ol' reasonable centrists?

fergus



A special section of Guantanamo?

Seriously, much of the necon warfare I see in this country takes me back to Joe McCarthy. Then, as now, the true enemy wasn't communists or terrorists, it was the moderates in both parties.

The intent was to paint anyone who was moderate (who thought a bit?) as soft and (remember this term) "wishy washy." They created a world in which men who actually knew better were afraid of expressing any reluctance for fear of seeming to support the "enemy."

This created both an orthodoxy that had a built-in positive feedback curve. There was no balance at all. Anything said against the Soviets (at today against anyone labeled terrorists) was good and any attempt to moderate a failing or dangerous position of mistake was crushed under the "that's what they want us to do" juggernaut.

Eventually, they built up such a huge but mishapen and overbalanced structure that a few brave men were able to bring it crashing down. No one who has ever seen Joseph Welch hurling that wonderful disgust-filled statement, "Have you no shame, Sir?", at McCarthy can forget the moment.

There are far too many parallels between those days and today for anyone to feel comfortable.

_____________________________

www.lovingdominant.org

(in reply to fergus)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) - 2/23/2006 7:23:18 PM   
Moloch


Posts: 1090
Joined: 6/25/2005
Status: offline 		You may not like it but TRUE freedom is a double Edged sword. Besides whe as americans belive in STATE rights, which means states should be able to decide their own laws.

(in reply to JohnWarren)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) - 2/23/2006 7:57:06 PM   
brightspot


Posts: 3052
Status: offline
quote:

Because it's important that women be made to carry zygotes to term no matter what psychological, physical, financial, or social harm may result.

Go Team America!

Goddamned yahoos...


This is only the beginning of the worst to come, I know it began when the current presidency was elected to a second term. I figured at least 2 Supreme Court judges would be replaced during it.
I really do not doubt for a minute Roe vs Wade being overturned.
I think people should prepare themselves for a Lot of scarey shit coming to fruition. We need a Democratic Woman in the House! JMHO of course.

*Brightspot

_____________________________

"Comedy is NOT Pretty!" ~Peter Nelson

But..."May at Least One person have a sense of Humor!" ~KML.

http://360.yahoo.com/my_profile-TD4TwEw8crWS3GHFDcs_DK1rHmW6Dq_E;_ylt=Av2PfG9gH0wkQrMPivuMCivGAOJ3

(in reply to Chaingang)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) - 2/23/2006 8:13:48 PM   
mistoferin


Posts: 8284
Joined: 10/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

We need a Democratic Woman in the House! JMHO of course .


omg..now that really would be some scary shit coming to fruition!!!

_____________________________

Peace and light,
~erin~

There are no victims here...only volunteers.

When you make a habit of playing on the tracks, you thereby forfeit the right to bitch when you get hit by a train.

"I did it! I admit it and I'm gonna do it again!"

(in reply to brightspot)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) - 2/23/2006 10:38:10 PM   
brightspot


Posts: 3052
Status: offline
quote:

omg..now that really would be some scary shit coming to fruition!!!


Well, mistoferin, I guess we will see where scarey chit lie, won't we?.

*Brightspot

_____________________________

"Comedy is NOT Pretty!" ~Peter Nelson

But..."May at Least One person have a sense of Humor!" ~KML.

http://360.yahoo.com/my_profile-TD4TwEw8crWS3GHFDcs_DK1rHmW6Dq_E;_ylt=Av2PfG9gH0wkQrMPivuMCivGAOJ3

(in reply to mistoferin)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) - 2/23/2006 11:36:46 PM   
Chaingang


Posts: 1727
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline 		Just as a heads up here, the South Dakota bill's main sponsor was Democratic Sen. Julie Bartling. So there you go: a democrat and a woman.

I find that in relation to govt. most issues have become us versus them, as in "we the people" versus the govt. Party affiliations have become meaningless as both parties fight for the center and to appear tougher on crime and terror than the next guy. Everybody wants to please culturally ultra-conservative bible thumpers in order to get their votes.

_____________________________

"Everything flows, nothing stands still." (Πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει) - Heraclitus

(in reply to brightspot)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) - 2/24/2006 9:33:24 AM   
perverseangelic


Posts: 2625
Joined: 2/2/2004
From: Davis, Ca
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moloch

You may not like it but TRUE freedom is a double Edged sword. Besides whe as americans belive in STATE rights, which means states should be able to decide their own laws.


It does, yes, but not at the expense of freedoms that are protected on a larger level.

For example, states rights would and -should- be liimted if a state attempted to pass a law denying women the right to vote. Federal laws take precident.

So, sure, states rights are wonderful but they should not come at the expense of federal protections.

_____________________________

~in the begining it is always dark~

(in reply to Moloch)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) - 2/24/2006 9:50:23 AM   
Moloch


Posts: 1090
Joined: 6/25/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaingang

Just as a heads up here, the South Dakota bill's main sponsor was Democratic Sen. Julie Bartling. So there you go: a democrat and a woman.

I find that in relation to govt. most issues have become us versus them, as in "we the people" versus the govt. Party affiliations have become meaningless as both parties fight for the center and to appear tougher on crime and terror than the next guy. Everybody wants to please culturally ultra-conservative bible thumpers in order to get their votes.

quote:

govt. most issues have become us versus them, as in "we the people" versus the govt. Party affiliations have become meaningless


Hmm everybody wants to please the ultras? Its south-dakota.... almost everybody in South Dakota is a conservative. If you are gonna try to spread such things as letting women decide what to do with their bodies and try to get re-elected you might as well walk in the Middle of Bronx while screaming white power and wear white sheets.
Those lawmakers represent the majority of South Dakota, they are not after "your rights" they are after getting those votes for the upcoming re-election.
Belive me conservatives get screwed they same way by their "represantatives"

(in reply to Chaingang)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) - 2/24/2006 9:54:29 AM   
Moloch


Posts: 1090
Joined: 6/25/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: perverseangelic

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moloch

You may not like it but TRUE freedom is a double Edged sword. Besides whe as americans belive in STATE rights, which means states should be able to decide their own laws.


It does, yes, but not at the expense of freedoms that are protected on a larger level.

For example, states rights would and -should- be liimted if a state attempted to pass a law denying women the right to vote. Federal laws take precident.

So, sure, states rights are wonderful but they should not come at the expense of federal protections.

quote:


For example, states rights would and -should- be liimted if a state attempted to pass a law denying women the right to vote. Federal laws take precident.

So, sure, states rights are wonderful but they


Yeah I agree, we had a Civil War because of "states rights" south lost, which means Federal trumps state laws and regulations.
I am not familiar with the laws, besides the Supreme Court case is there a federal law protecting womens rights to do abortion's?

(in reply to perverseangelic)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) - 2/24/2006 10:54:59 AM   
JohnWarren


Posts: 3807
Joined: 3/18/2005
From: Delray Beach, FL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moloch
I am not familiar with the laws, besides the Supreme Court case is there a federal law protecting womens rights to do abortion's?


The Supremes headed by Blackmun drew on the fourth and sixth amendments to infer a consitutional right to privacy over the workings of a person's body.

Whether such a right exists is the core of the battle going on now

_____________________________

www.lovingdominant.org

(in reply to Moloch)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) - 2/24/2006 11:03:40 AM   
Chaingang


Posts: 1727
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnWarren
The Supremes headed by Blackmun drew on the fourth and sixth amendments to infer a consitutional right to privacy over the workings of a person's body.


Sad how the Constitution and the Bill of Rights work exactly how they weren't supposed to.

Ninth Amendment:
"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

In other words we all have rights that may not have been enumerated yet. They must be around here someplace...


_____________________________

"Everything flows, nothing stands still." (Πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει) - Heraclitus

(in reply to JohnWarren)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) - 2/24/2006 11:01:10 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaingang

quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnWarren
The Supremes headed by Blackmun drew on the fourth and sixth amendments to infer a consitutional right to privacy over the workings of a person's body.


Sad how the Constitution and the Bill of Rights work exactly how they weren't supposed to.

Ninth Amendment:
"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

In other words we all have rights that may not have been enumerated yet. They must be around here someplace...



life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

The problem as i see it is legal abortion bypassed due process and may very well violate the right to life. of course therin lies the debacle. Its interesting how the the argument "when it is considered a life" came after the ruling. It seems to me that the if it cannot be proven to be life or non life now it certainly could not have been proven to be non life prior to the ruling and therefore should have been thrown out of court in the first place. i question if the ruling could stand if put to the test against the right to life. The burden of proof as far as i am concerned was on the woman and as a result of that ruling now the burden of proof has wrongfully been placed on society.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Chaingang)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Abortion Banned in South Dakota (Health or Off-Topic?) Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.111