Rhodes85 -> RE: Why does collarme... (8/20/2009 6:13:12 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TurboJugend quote:
ORIGINAL: Rhodes85 and to the OP....you're right, the full nude pics are in violation of their TOS...even says in the upload window 'no explicit genital nudity' and they approve them anyway....am I the only one that finds that a bit odd? it says now "No explicit primary photos" not sure what is meant with that. So nude is ok now. And what is explicit....that is different for any one. So I guess unless people don't report it..it is ok? Hmm, I hadn't noticed that...then again I haven't updated my pics in awhile lol I'm not exactly sure what they mean by 'explicit' but I would say its safe to assume it would refer to sexual acts or explicit nudity. If I were running this site i'd make sure I was alot more specific about what is and isn't allowed in pics, so it didn't come back to bite me in the ass later. I don't particularly trust relying on 'volunteers' to do anything either. Theres good ones, but theres plenty of them that don't really care what they do. Not a good thing considering the site is liable for their actions. I was under the impression most sites stopped relying on volunteers after the administration staff of Ultima Online sued (and won) OSI a few years back. Well, anyways not a risk I would take.
|
|
|
|