ThatDamnedPanda
Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Loki45 Ahh that's where we come to the REAL problem now, isn't it? You see, I have often suggested a system by which the 'innocent' can truly be spared, but that idea is always referred to as 'big brother' and people throw out quotes from a 1949 novel and then more quotes about how if we're willing to give up freedom for security, then we deserve neither. Well, how about we change it up? Instead of "sacrificing" freedom for security, (which by the way it was never adequately explained how the prevalance of cameras would take away those freedoms, but whatever), instead of "sacrificing" those freedoms for security, how about we 'sacrifice' them for 'protection' from false prosecution? You see, I have done what I asked you to do. I have suggested a better system. That way, we can be as sure as humanly possible that the guy getting fried is the one who should be getting fried, but people don't like my suggestion because they feel that would take away their freedoms. I'm sorry, but I'm afraid I have no idea what you're talking about here. quote:
ORIGINAL: Loki45 If I am in my home when an intruder comes in, I am well within my rights to kill him. If he beats me to the punch, the state should be well within its rights to do it for me. This argument is baseless. If someone enters your home unlawfully, you have the right to kill him to defend yourself. You do not have the right to kill him in revenge for entering your home. quote:
ORIGINAL: Loki45 Edited to add: When I think of the death penalty, I try and put myself in the victim's shoes. If it were someone I cared about lying dead in their home, what would I do? And the simple answer is that there would be nowhere safe for the perpetrator. I would hunt him down and ensure that no one would die by his hand ever again. When it's not my loved ones who are the victims, I am perfectly fine with the state ensuring that same thing for the victims. And i would do the same, without hesitation or compunction. Believe me, I have nothing against vengeance. None whatsoever. It's a normal human reaction, as far as I'm concerned. But that's exactly why we have a justice system - to take the element of human emotion (as much as possible) out of the process of judging and punishing the offender. quote:
ORIGINAL: Loki45 We all know a life sentence doesn't mean a life sentence. Just ask the bomber released in Scotland. We're not Scotland, so we are not bound by Scottish law. I'm sure Scotland will allow us to write our own laws regarding "life without possibility of parole."
_____________________________
Panda, panda, burning bright In the forest of the night What immortal hand or eye Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?
|