MissCake
Posts: 149
Joined: 9/18/2008 Status: offline
|
Yeah sure, slaves can have slaves, Mistresses can have Masters. Mistresses' slave can be master to her master, and they can all each own the same play-pony. Any possible combination of subs and doms and tops and bottoms and in-betweens and off-to-the-sides you can imagine has been done. I don't own my slave's car. I don't own his watch. I don't own his slaves, because I don't own him and he doesn't own them, because this is all fricken' fantasy world we have brought to life, a game with only those rules we agree on in each arrangement, and we can play it however the heck we want. This slave does not have to portion out his care so that one gets cared for more than another. Care is not a limited commodity. He can care for each of them infinitely. But if he cares for any of them, he should be honest with all of them. Of course you knew that though, otherwise you wouldn't have been asking. (You would have probably been over in one of the "tribute" threads whining about some shit like that instead.)
|