airborne92 -> RE: Why do the good generals always end uplosing? (9/2/2009 8:45:06 AM)
|
quote:
Then another comment on Rommel that he was excellent managing a force like the Afrika Corp of about 6 divisions?? But then also I wonder that as the victors write the history do they pump up the image & ability of their defeated enemy to make their victory seem all the greater??????........... Yes, Rommel was at his pinnacle when commanding the Afrika Korps. He was an excellent commander up to the Corps level, anything larger and he began to lose his ability to effectively command. To the second part, that is a yes and no answer. For some of the victorious generals, the need to pump up the image and ability of their defeated enemy was needed to make them look better for history but any decent study of those conflicts will shed light on the actual truth. Other generals, like Patton, never needed to have the image and ability of his enemy pumped up. He was that good of a commander, at any level. Wellington was another commander that also did not need the ability and image of his enemy pumped up. So the answer for this question would depend greatly on the actual skill of the general in question.
|
|
|
|