RE: SSC vs RACK (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


JohnWarren -> RE: SSC vs RACK (2/26/2006 3:36:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
There is no definitive work on this, no law, no great premise, and I believe John would be the first to agree......


Total agreement. That's one of the drums I am wont to pound at the least excuse.




Petruchio -> SUCK vs FUCK (2/26/2006 5:11:54 PM)

I propose new acronyms:

FUCK = friggin' urgent coital kink

vs

SUCK = slippery ultimate cummin' kiss





mnottertail -> RE: SUCK vs FUCK (2/26/2006 5:27:07 PM)

These are cute acronyms Petruchio, but they have no first principles associated with them; how say you?

LOL, (but not really)

Ron




Petruchio -> RE: SUCK vs FUCK (2/26/2006 6:20:13 PM)

quote:

These are cute acronyms Petruchio, but they have no first principles associated with them; how say you?


Principles? At a time like this?




mnottertail -> RE: SUCK vs FUCK (2/26/2006 6:35:15 PM)

Well goddammit, without principles or fundamental truths, what are we but clowns or republicans?

Bozo





EvilGeoff -> RE: SUCK vs FUCK (2/26/2006 6:53:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Well goddammit, without principles or fundamental truths, what are we but clowns or republicans?

Bozo




Democrats

YIK,
- Geoff




angelic -> RE: SUCK vs FUCK (2/26/2006 6:59:29 PM)

ok here's a question for the ages... when i click on forums i see this thread as being SUCK vs. FUCK... when i click on the thread it is SSC v. RACK??? either i'm REALLY tired or Ssomeone is trying to mess with me!!!! [:o]




ownedgirlie -> RE: SSC vs RACK (2/26/2006 7:02:16 PM)

(Since when does ice have cholesterol?)




ownedgirlie -> RE: SUCK vs FUCK (2/26/2006 7:06:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: angelic

ok here's a question for the ages... when i click on forums i see this thread as being SUCK vs. FUCK... when i click on the thread it is SSC v. RACK??? either i'm REALLY tired or Ssomeone is trying to mess with me!!!! [:o]


i got the same too, angelic. Thought it would be an intriguing thread... ~ grin ~

Maybe it was a censored thing.




angelic -> RE: SUCK vs FUCK (2/26/2006 7:08:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ownedgirlie


quote:

ORIGINAL: angelic

ok here's a question for the ages... when i click on forums i see this thread as being SUCK vs. FUCK... when i click on the thread it is SSC v. RACK??? either i'm REALLY tired or Ssomeone is trying to mess with me!!!! [:o]


i got the same too, angelic. Thought it would be an intriguing thread... ~ grin ~

Maybe it was a censored thing.


whew thank you owned.. i truly thought i was starting to see things! thank goodness i don't live far from a State institution!!! LOL




ownedgirlie -> RE: SUCK vs FUCK (2/26/2006 7:09:21 PM)

Either that or we're both drinking the same coffee...lol




EvilGeoff -> RE: SUCK vs FUCK (2/26/2006 7:09:37 PM)

Not to hijack the thread though...

SSC and RACK are nothing more than marketing slogans, a way to try to make what we do seem less scarey to the vanillas.

Arguing RACK vs SSC is about as effective, and meaningful, as arguing "Floggers" vs "Canes" or Buddhism vs Christianity or "scrambled eggs & bacon" vs "green eggs & ham"... It's about taste, preference, what strikes an internal chord within _you_. Which tool, if either, would you use to try to explain what you do to your clueless, vanilla, friends?

And as for education, brother, EVERYONE needs it. From the most experienced player, to the newest OMG I just found out there are kinky people out there newbie. No one is born knowing how to do all the kinky pervy fun things we do in a way that is at least moderately safe. And yes, there are ways to minimize the risk even with very dangerous forms of play.

And yes, there are people out there that should have their hands removed so they don't harm themselves or anyone else because of their incompetence and foolishness, but because we can't remove their hands, the rest of us have to keep an eye on them, if for no other reason than to protect ourselves from the fallout of their screw ups.

Those people need an acronym of their own - STINK - Supremely Terrible Incompetent Nincompoop Kink, and we could call them "STINKers" as a way of warning those without the sense God gave a donut, from playing with the morons...

YIK,
- Geoff




mnottertail -> RE: Eat Me You Whores!!!! (2/26/2006 7:10:51 PM)

It is the last subject line posted, no more, no less.

Ron




angelic -> RE: SUCK vs FUCK (2/26/2006 7:11:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ownedgirlie

Either that or we're both drinking the same coffee...lol


LOL ok... i'm going to say that then!!! it's the coffee, it's the coffee!!!




Vancouver_cinful -> RE: SSC vs RACK (2/26/2006 8:37:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LthrdWolf
Yup & We have Cages here too!!!!!!!

LthrdWolf



Oooooooo, I'm resisting, I'm resisting!!

Cin




Vancouver_cinful -> RE: SSC vs RACK (2/26/2006 8:50:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
If you start shoving monkey's up your ass, you should read the chapter, from "Loving Dominant", By John Warren on the subject, to familarize yourself with the in's and out's of it.........

If you believe there is a Chapter in that book about shoving monkeys up your ass, then you really need to read that book........
Ron


::sputtering coffee all over the screen::

Damn!! The visuals that are stuck in my head now.

What a way to make a point, Ron. Top marks for that, and thanks for the laugh!

Cin




PlayfulOne -> RE: SSC vs RACK (2/27/2006 4:21:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: KnightofMists


quote:

ORIGINAL: PlayfulOne

What about just old plain common sense?

K



mmmmmmmmmm cause it ain't so common as one would think!?


Sadly you are correct. I have never given these things much thought, from the start I understaood that many of the things we do are dangerous and can lead to great harm if not performed correctly. Hence I have alwyas taken great care to develop my skills and keep my partenr safe.

I am not sure acromyms are boing to truly help someone who can't grasp that concept.

K




Petruchio -> RE: SUCK vs FUCK (2/27/2006 5:27:55 PM)

quote:

I am not sure acromyms are boing to truly help


boing? Was there a sudden turn-on in the middle of that sentence?




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125