I don't even know what party this guy belongs to ... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


FirmhandKY -> I don't even know what party this guy belongs to ... (9/8/2009 7:23:50 PM)

... but this MF needs to be booted out on his ass ASAP.

Baron Hill (IN-09): This Is My Town Hall Meeting. I Set the Rules.

Short video of "his" townhall meeting, where a young girl asks if she can video her question, and his answer ...

Not verbatim, but close:

"This is my townhall meeting and I'm not going to let you (the audience) tell me how to run my congressional office."

"These kind of videos end up on Youtube, in a compromising position."


Dumbass. Twice over. For being ignorant that he really can't STOP videos nowadays, and for giving the perfect reason for one of his to end up on Youtube, showing him in a "compromising position".

Not to mention that the "you" who "can't tell me how to run his congressional office" are his citizen electors ... who he works for.

Ass. Whatever party he claims. I didn't even bother to look, because I really don't care.

Firm




servantforuse -> RE: I don't even know what party this guy belongs to ... (9/8/2009 7:27:02 PM)

He is a democrat, from Indiana I believe.




tazzygirl -> RE: I don't even know what party this guy belongs to ... (9/8/2009 7:36:33 PM)

Democrat Hill is a conservative from a conservative area. (By no means all Democrats are progressives.) Elected to Congress before, an old hand, the returning Hill had swiftly hooked up with the Blue Dog Coalition, 52 Democrats who are a factor delaying for example passage of the American Affordable Health Care Act of 2009 (H.R. 3200), thus becoming a crucial swing vote on epochal legislation. Hill -- whose website accurately shows the national debt spinning as fast as an electric meter whirls, though the site's numbers are arguably misleading -- has called for cutbacks or more government savings or income to balance the spending. His constituents do not agree about what stance he should take next.

Indeed many said they were not sure where he stood. Constituents at the New Albany town hall whispered that on Hill's government website under Issues, he stated that health care was a right, but said little about how to provide it, let alone cost-effectively. When searched for "health care bill," the site accessed Thomas, a U.S. government database that coughed up only old health care bills. When "single payer" or "public option" was entered in the search box, it brought up no reference more recent than 2004. Even when the accurate number of the main 2009 reform bill, H.R. 3200, was entered, Hill's site--or Thomas-- wrongly identified it as a proposal "to expand the travel and transportation allowances available to members of the Armed Forces granted leave...."



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gail-mcgowan-mellor/the-new-town-hall-reality_b_277983.html

Stress......




Arpig -> RE: I don't even know what party this guy belongs to ... (9/8/2009 8:05:29 PM)

You're right, there was nobetter way of insuring he ended up on youtube...dumb fucker.[:D]




tazzygirl -> RE: I don't even know what party this guy belongs to ... (9/8/2009 8:10:18 PM)

LOL... hey... he is a Dem... what can i say... one got under the radar?




rulemylife -> RE: I don't even know what party this guy belongs to ... (9/8/2009 8:42:26 PM)

Gosh golly, I don't even know what party he belongs to because I don't anything about this whole Googley stuff.

[sm=angel.gif]




DomKen -> RE: I don't even know what party this guy belongs to ... (9/8/2009 8:54:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

Gosh golly, I don't even know what party he belongs to because I don't anything about this whole Googley stuff.

[sm=angel.gif]


lol.




FirmhandKY -> RE: I don't even know what party this guy belongs to ... (9/8/2009 9:02:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

Gosh golly, I don't even know what party he belongs to because I don't anything about this whole Googley stuff.

[sm=angel.gif]


I didn't bother to google it to find out, because (as I said) he's an ass, regardless of his political affiliation.

He's an "elite politician": part of the elite class who think they have a right to hold office.

He just happens to be a "Blue Dog Democrat" which means he generally holds conservative views.

I don't care.

He's an ass, who needs to lose his office.

Perhaps, for you and DK, idiots who are of your party need to be given a pass when they act like asses.

I'm sorry for you, then.

Firm




rulemylife -> RE: I don't even know what party this guy belongs to ... (9/8/2009 9:13:10 PM)

And do you think his response had anything to do with town hall protesters who have disrupted town hall meetings to the point they could not continue unless police were called in to eject the protesters?




Arpig -> RE: I don't even know what party this guy belongs to ... (9/8/2009 9:23:09 PM)

quote:

And do you think his response had anything to do with town hall protesters who have disrupted town hall meetings to the point they could not continue unless police were called in to eject the protesters?
I doubt it,he himself stated why he wouldn't let people film the meeting (you may have noticed no shortage of press filming though). he didn't want to end upon youtube looking stupid...and VIOLA!!! there he is on youtube looking stupid.




FirmhandKY -> RE: I don't even know what party this guy belongs to ... (9/8/2009 9:28:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

quote:

And do you think his response had anything to do with town hall protesters who have disrupted town hall meetings to the point they could not continue unless police were called in to eject the protesters?
I doubt it,he himself stated why he wouldn't let people film the meeting (you may have noticed no shortage of press filming though). he didn't want to end upon youtube looking stupid...and VIOLA!!! there he is on youtube looking stupid.


Arpig, I think the irony escapes some people.

Firm




rulemylife -> RE: I don't even know what party this guy belongs to ... (9/8/2009 10:12:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

I doubt it,he himself stated why he wouldn't let people film the meeting (you may have noticed no shortage of press filming though). he didn't want to end upon youtube looking stupid...and VIOLA!!! there he is on youtube looking stupid.



And why would you doubt it considering the stream of so-called protests at town hall meetings that preceded his?







TheHeretic -> RE: I don't even know what party this guy belongs to ... (9/8/2009 10:31:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

I doubt it,he himself stated why he wouldn't let people film the meeting (you may have noticed no shortage of press filming though). he didn't want to end upon youtube looking stupid...and VIOLA!!! there he is on youtube looking stupid.



And why would you doubt it considering the stream of so-called protests at town hall meetings that preceded his?







Asked and answered, RML.  See the bolded text you quoted.




FirmhandKY -> RE: I don't even know what party this guy belongs to ... (9/8/2009 10:54:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

I doubt it,he himself stated why he wouldn't let people film the meeting (you may have noticed no shortage of press filming though). he didn't want to end upon youtube looking stupid...and VIOLA!!! there he is on youtube looking stupid.



And why would you doubt it considering the stream of so-called protests at town hall meetings that preceded his?







Asked and answered, RML.  See the bolded text you quoted.

What rule is really advocating is that government shouldn't be exposed to the light of public exposure. Back rooms and star chambers are now de riguer, since the "right people" are in charge.

Firm




DomImus -> RE: I don't even know what party this guy belongs to ... (9/9/2009 2:32:26 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY
Ass. Whatever party he claims. I didn't even bother to look, because I really don't care.


I didn't have to look. It's plainly obvious just from his quoted comments in your post. Much like the case of Ted Kennedy going back to the Senate for another 40 years - I don't blame the politicians. They didn't vote themselves into office.




UncleNasty -> RE: I don't even know what party this guy belongs to ... (9/10/2009 7:23:43 AM)

Doesn't he score points for being honest about his refusal to represent his constituents?

"And I promise if elected I'll  pay no attention whatsoever to the wants and needs of the citizens of the great state of ______!!"

Uncle Nasty




servantforuse -> RE: I don't even know what party this guy belongs to ... (9/10/2009 9:46:11 AM)

No angry mob here. Just a young student asking a question in a very polite way.




tazzygirl -> RE: I don't even know what party this guy belongs to ... (9/10/2009 1:46:41 PM)

Yep, and his reaction was overboard. If you cant handle the heat, no matter what "apron" you are wearing, then get out of the kitchen. Hopefully his constituents will realize his inability and elect someone else more suited to the job.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125