CallaFirestormBW -> RE: Why I prefer men over women (9/10/2009 2:15:48 PM)
|
You know -- over the years, I've had a bit of experience with submissive individuals of both end-genders, and quite a few variations in between... and, in general, those experiences have been good, regardless of gender. Of course, I'm nit-picky early on, and really pretty clear about what I expect... and also pretty insistent about understanding what the submissive individual expects out of the deal, too. I've had a few "do-me" subs across the genders... and you know what... I accepted them as the bottoms they were, and we had a -hoot-. I've also had comprehensive-authority-dynamic servants across the genders who have been amazing, giving, and truly yielding individuals. I've had the pleasure of meeting people in my travels who spread across the spectrum of submission, and I find that, as long as I accept the person for who xhe is, and our dynamic develops within that context, I have absolutely no problem with behavioral issues. It's only when, for whatever reason, the other person and I haven't gotten a good grasp on what we're trying to shape, and aren't working on shaping the same thing that we end up in trouble -- again, regardless of gender. If I'm trying to shape a house servant and the other person is trying to shape a singletail top... well... we're not going to make a good connection and someone is going to be miserable, right? I don't think gender has anything to do with it. I think -bias- has everything to do with functionality, and that bias is something we have to truly -want- to get rid of. It sounds to me like the OP likes men. There is -nothing- wrong with that at all. If she doesn't want a female submissive, then she shouldn't have to justify, to anyone (even to herself) that decision, and come up with fanciful theories about why a female wouldn't work. Just accept that males trip the trigger, and be forthright about that without any need to apologize. Dame Calla
|
|
|
|