HeavansKeeper -> RE: Torture (9/10/2009 9:15:30 PM)
|
I think I understand what Billy is heading toward. There are multiple engines to drive people's motives. Devotion, anger, avoidance of pain... Most willing participants of D/s either will do an act or consider it a hard limit, and view requiring it to be abusive. At this point it gets ugly: safe-word or lawsuit. I can see the allure of pushing someone into certain acts with the "your devotion is irrelevant, so long as you're obedient" mentality. It's kind of sexy, maybe... "It doesn't matter what you think, feel, or say - so long as you do as told." The sick perverted side of me grins wickedly thinking of a crying bottom continuing anyway. But it's still a farce. At this point, the bottom is either continuing to consent or is being assaulted/battered/raped. It's that simple. I'll be the first to say assault, battery, and rape are all bad. BAD BAD BAD. That means it's a catch-22. If they submit from the torture, then they actually consent all along, they just wanted to play out the emotions of the role play. If they honestly do not wish to continue, the top is a violent criminal. I'll point out that role playing "torture", rape, forced bisexuality can all feel very real. And there can be very real internal struggle as well. But in the end, it's all a game.
|
|
|
|