DemonKia
Posts: 5521
Joined: 10/13/2007 From: Chico, Nor-Cali Status: offline
|
FR, after read thru I love children's fiction. I have an especial fondness for reading aloud late 19th-century fiction to young people. I've read stacks of books aloud to my offspring, up into their teens (one of them would still have me read aloud to him, lol). I particularly adore reading Kipling's Just So stories out loud, the language is gorgeous . . . . . I love children's movies . . . . . . I think the best children's films are amongst the great works of cinema . . . . . In both cases, I like them when they're good. (A subjective matter all on its own . . . . ) Some children's lit is vastly over-rated & the movies are better (I'm staring hard at L. Frank Baum on that one, but your mileage may vary . .. .) Some it's the other way 'round . . . . After I read thru the above posts (up to Manxy's) & had 'walked away' & done other stuff, I kept thinking of the rather marginal written material that has been transmuted into some of my favorite cinematic kiddie funfests, particularly 'Chittie Chittie Bang Bang'. The book is an 'eh' kinda thing, but the movie is a charming & bizarre piece of 'classic cinema' for me . . . . . 'Mary Poppins', too. The books didn't do much for me, but I love the movie . .. . . On the other hand, I loved the Little House books & always felt the teevee show fell far short . . . . . So. I guess I'm a mixed bag gal on this one. Sometimes they screw it up, sometimes they exceed specs . . . . . (&, yes, I do quake in my boots & avoid certain books-into-movies cuz I jus' know they're gonna make it all 'Hollywood' & 'commercial product' . . . . . . But I also wish that certain books I love would get the decent filmic treatment they deserve, too . . . . . They would be wondrous movies, done right . . .. . ) The 'Where the Wild Things Are' movie has been a bit of a puzzle in that direction. Sendak is one of the really good modern children's authors, & that book is a treasured bit of the offsprings' childhoods. (The two male offspring are looking forward to seeing the flick . . . .) I'm both kinda hesitant (the trailers, especially the first one, were less than impressive), & kinda hopeful (the director has made at least one of my all time favorite movies -- 'Being John Malkovich') . . . . . . . But I keep my expectations on a very short leash with regard to mainstream Hollywood entertainment product: the pleasant surprises are the exceptions & much of what gets chucked out is drek . . . . . . . Ah. As to the literacy thing. Yeah. Kids aren't gonna pick up reading-for-pleasure if the people around them don't read for pleasure, & I have noted that many homes lack books. Magazines. Newspapers. Homes where no one reads -- jus' cuz -- are homes where no one reads . . . . . . I don't feel particularly alarmist about this, tho', as I know how illiterate populations were, historically speaking, & with the advent of the internet (a largely text driven place) I feel pretty confident that literacy is spreading rather than retreating. When I was a kid none of my peers wrote outside of the classroom setting; now, kids blog & email & text . . . . People can fuss that texting's not 'really' writing, but not writing was not really writing. That whole debate reminds me of the mid-20th century alarums about the evils of comic books & how they were gonna render whole swathes of youth zomboid, brain dead, & illiterate. But instead comic books are just another tool in the kit to get people reading . . . . . . Literacy isn't a zero-sum game, the more tools available to exercise written communication, the more literacy . . . . . & there's way too many books & periodicals & webpages on the planet to expect any one person to read but a fraction of all that . . . .. Well, that, & have a life . . . . . . . So I don't expect 'most people' to have read any given set of books. In my world view, at least . . . . .
< Message edited by DemonKia -- 9/21/2009 10:32:39 PM >
_____________________________
Snarko ergo sum. The Verbossinator
|