RE: Trust and Faith (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


KnightofMists -> RE: Trust and Faith (3/8/2006 5:13:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BitaTruble

quote:

The way we use conventional relationship is to define the foundation or building blocks of a relationship. Trust, faith, respect, love, passion, devotion and commitment are a few examples of the elements that make up a conventional relationship.


That clears up some things, but I can't help but notice that you didn't include obedience as one of the elements which make up a conventional relationship.




When someome says "A few examples" eludes and reflects that it is incomplete list. The fact that she didn't actaully state the term "obedience" doesn't mean or eluded to anything... thou you really want to read between the invisible lines... maybe put your own agenda in there!




kyraofMists -> RE: Trust and Faith (3/8/2006 5:45:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BitaTruble

Obedience, however, I would see more in a parental/child structure or even an old fashioned Victorian husband/wife marriage, so I'm not sure where it comes into play in the case of KoM and yourself outside of M/s or how the building blocks you mentioned can come into play outside of an M/s - poly structure. In other words, all of the elements which you listed are not traditionally available to someone who is already committed to another outside of M/s - poly. Can you elaborate just a bit more on that particular issue?

Celeste


My pleasure

I am not obedient to my Lord just because I am in an M/s structure. I am obedient to him because that is how I interact in an intimate relationship with an extremely dominant man. I was obeying him long before we entered a formal M/s structure, though he was very careful to only offer suggestions or opinions and not instructions.

By the way that you are typing "M/s - poly" you appear to be linking these two dynamics as one, is that the case? Granted, that my specific dynamic contains both, but that is not the case for everyone.

quote:

In other words, all of the elements which you listed are not traditionally available to someone who is already committed to another outside of M/s - poly.


Why are these elements not available outside of an M/s or poly relationship just because someone is in a committed relationship?

Knight's kyra




BitaTruble -> RE: Trust and Faith (3/8/2006 10:13:05 PM)

quote:

When someome says "A few examples" eludes and reflects that it is incomplete list. The fact that she didn't actaully state the term "obedience" doesn't mean or eluded to anything... thou you really want to read between the invisible lines... maybe put your own agenda in there!


Actually, I stressed the word obedience in my first post to her, so was surprised she didn't refer to it and that's all that I meant by it. I don't have any agenda other than trying to understand the dynamic you share with her without an M/s - poly structure being in place. I think the word obedience is a very important one in this dialouge and she's the one who used it first and I wondered why given the rest of the post.

Celeste




amayos -> RE: Trust and Faith (3/8/2006 10:29:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ModeratorEleven

quote:

ORIGINAL: amayos

Whips, riding crops, belts, knives...anything less tacky would do.

If you have alternate images that you think would go well with the 'theme' of the forums, contact one of the mods via email. There's no guarantee your contrbutions will (or can) be used, but making such a contribution would be "less tacky" than just complaining [;)]

XI


I may very well take you up on that challenge, Ms. XI.




BitaTruble -> RE: Trust and Faith (3/8/2006 10:43:07 PM)


quote:



My pleasure

I am not obedient to my Lord just because I am in an M/s structure. I am obedient to him because that is how I interact in an intimate relationship with an extremely dominant man. I was obeying him long before we entered a formal M/s structure, though he was very careful to only offer suggestions or opinions and not instructions.


Thank you, Krya. That clears things up for me.

quote:

By the way that you are typing "M/s - poly" you appear to be linking these two dynamics as one, is that the case? Granted, that my specific dynamic contains both, but that is not the case for everyone.


Absolute agreement.. I was specifically asking about 'your' relationship with KoM.


quote:

Why are these elements not available outside of an M/s or poly relationship just because someone is in a committed relationship?


You see, I can only relate by my own definition of conventional which is why I asked for clarification of yours. My definition of conventional as it relates to intimacy is traditional, vanilla and monogamous.. otherwise it's alternative, not conventional, so my brain does not wrap itself around intimacy with married men unless it's alternative in nature, so the structure of the relationship does have some import to me.

I just wanted to make sure that I understood you completely. What I am reading here is that you will obey any extremely dominant male if you are engaging in an intimate relationship and the structure he lives under is unimportant to the intimate relationship. It remains the same regardless of that structure.

You have clarified my confusion, which, as I expected was a difference in definition of the term conventional.

Celeste




sskitten -> RE: Trust and Faith (3/8/2006 11:35:40 PM)

quote:

i am curious what trust and faith mean to both Dominants and submissives. Sometimes i have trouble being the trustworthy person i wish to be.

Also when do we stop beating our heads agains the wall? Accept that things aren't what we want and may never be?


Okay, after having slogged through 7 pages of this thread, may I bring it back to the OP? Slavekoko, if you are still reading this thread, I notice that your post is the one and only post you've ever made on these boards to date. (Welcome!) After posing your question you have remained silent as the discussion has raged on. Has any of this been helpful at all? I've read your profile and journal and I note that you have been on collarme for a bit over two years and started looking for a D/s relationship a year before that. You sound rather discouraged in your journal, and I feel for you. Here, you've not just asked what trust and faith mean, but you have stated very honestly and poignantly that sometimes you have trouble being the trustworthy person you wish to be. Putting together your post with your journal, it seems that beating your head against the wall seems to refer not to a bad relationship but to the lack of any meaningful D/s relationship having developed during your three-year search to date... and I can understand why that would be discouraging, but I hope you do not give up on your search.

Even though my circumstances are quite different from yours, I've had to think a lot about trust and faith too because sometimes I have had trouble being a trustworthy person. It seems most folks here assume that a person's character is constant whether they are operating in the vanilla world or the D/s world. And since there is a basic presumption that we all need to be absolutely trustworthy and trusting in the D/s world, maybe there is a parallel assumption that the same person is absolutely trustworthy in the vanilla world.

It's not so for me. It's not so for any married person who is being the slightest bit unfaithful, who is seeking something in the D/s world without the full knowledge and consent of the spouse... and that is my case, and that is the case for my Dom.

And so I do sometimes wonder about this. How is it that I can have absolute trust in someone here in the D/s world - trusting in his honesty, openness, integrity, and fidelity in this world - while knowing that he does not merit this same trust from his vanilla wife? And how can he have absolute trust in me - in my honesty, openness, integrity, and fidelity in this world - while knowing that I do not merit this same trust from my vanilla husband? And yet this is how it is in my D/s relationship and probably for nearly all D/s relationships even when there is rampant cheating on spouses.

So it makes me wonder: are we different people in our two different worlds? Are we fooling ourselves? Or what is it about the D/s world that makes it easier for us to be the noble selves we cannot seem to be in the vanilla world?

For me, faith figures into the answer. I'm not talking here about faith in the person or faith in myself. For me, it's faith in the journey.

I have faith that this journey to the as-yet-undiscovered core of myself is worth the risks. I have faith - after a lifetime of denial - that the secret longings I've felt since childhood merit some serious real-life consideration. I have faith that the Dom who claims to be leading me to where I want and need to go actually understands where I want and need to go... and knows how to lead me there. There are good grounds for my faith, but some faith is still required, each step of the way, because it is a journey into the unknown... the unknown in myself and the unknown in Us.

Sadly, I do not have this same faith in my husband or the vanilla journey we are on. And that is why I find it so very hard to be a faithful wife. This is not a justification... just a vague and partial understanding of why it is hard... (not impossible, but hard).....

I understand that in order for my marriage to survive and succeed, unfortunately I need to pretend to be at peace inside myself when I am not. I understand that if I am fully honest and open in my marriage, the marriage will collapse. Not every marriage would collapse, but mine would. And yet I don't just believe but *know* that my D/s relationship depends upon my complete honesty and openness, and the more honest and open I am with myself and with my Dom, the more our relationship thrives. Of course it should be that way in a healthy marriage too... but I guess the marriage of every cheating spouse is a crippled one, not a healthy one. Maybe it was crippled before the cheating began but the cheating cripples it all the more.

And so sometimes it's pretty hard to live in my skin these days, because the Real Me is finally coming to life (at the ripe old age of 50!) and that feels absolutely wonderful.... but it also feels absolutely horrible to be hurting my trusting family (when they are unaware of the hurt) but even more horrible to think of coming clean and destroying the family in the process.

For me, what this means is that I place even *more* faith in the journey... I have to believe it's worth it for my inner growth, in order to take this terrible risk with the happiness of my family. And it means I place even *more* trust in myself and my Dom that we will continue to be all we hope to be, and all we claim to be, and all we can be.

Does this render our trust and faith delusional, based on need more than a solid foundation? Not at all.

For me, perhaps the most significant evidence that my trust is well-placed is that my Dom is leading me to be a better person on the home front, for the direct benefit of my family. (It would be off-topic on this already-too-long post to detail the ways, but there are many.)

I guess my point is that for some of us it's not so tidy and black-and-white, but even if our trustworthiness in the vanilla world might be an undeniable shade of gray, we can still celebrate the joys of absolute trust and faith with someone special in the D/s world.

I guess for me the times when I have trouble being a trustworthy person are when I fear a grievous loss as an outcome of being trustworthy... loss of a loved one, or loss of self. The times when I have no trouble being trustworthy are when I am fearless - when I have faith that my trustworthiness will not result in a loss but in profound gains - when the best interests of the relationship align with my inner needs.

As to when do we stop beating our heads against a wall and accept that things aren't what we want and may never be.... hmmm. That's what I finally accepted in my marriage. But rather than just give up (either give up on my marriage or give up on my inner longings), I finally decided to seek a solution even though it was not the one I *thought* I should be seeking or the one my husband would approve of. The question almost seems to be asking, "When do we give up and reconcile ourselves with less than what we want and need?" I hope we never give up. But I hope we don't keep beating our heads against walls, either. When the beaten wall does not produce an open doorway, we can stop the beating while seeking another way over, under, around, or through the wall.

That's where absolute faith in the journey can sustain us... even in the absence of a specific person in whom to place our absolute trust and faith... even in the face of our flaws.

Hang in there -
Kitten




LATEXBABY64 -> RE: Trust and Faith (3/9/2006 12:05:04 AM)

wow that was a lot of reading lol humm trust and faith
trust is how we see and give to someone through our eyes our preceptions of being a part of

Faith is more spiritual of hope and wishing and wanting someone or something to be a certian way or to happen
for example i trust this person with my secreats or i have faith that things will work out like i would want

unless your in it you never know it



[sm=whip.gif]




sskitten -> RE: Trust and Faith (3/9/2006 12:08:50 AM)

By the way..... in saying "after slogging through 7 pages" I certainly meant no disrespect to all of you who have contributed so much food for thought. Your posts have helped me think more carefully and clearly about what trust and faith mean to me, and I thank you.

I only said "slogging" because it's a lot to read in one sitting (though I did read the first few pages a few days ago) and because of the dead horse in the middle... I was trying to glean the ideas, and the lengthy discussion of the styles of arriving at or sharing the ideas was threatening to overwhelm the idea-sharing itself... but it's also fun to get a sense of your personalities and to follow some of you from thread to thread... I am a silent reader of many of your posts on other threads... thank you for all your sharing. I am learning and growing and I've become quite addicted to these boards since taking my first peek not so many days ago!

Kitten




kyraofMists -> RE: Trust and Faith (3/9/2006 4:11:57 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitaTruble

You see, I can only relate by my own definition of conventional which is why I asked for clarification of yours. My definition of conventional as it relates to intimacy is traditional, vanilla and monogamous.. otherwise it's alternative, not conventional, so my brain does not wrap itself around intimacy with married men unless it's alternative in nature, so the structure of the relationship does have some import to me.


I do not see trust, faith, love, passion, devotion.... as being limited in quantity. I can have a relationship with a monogamous married man that includes some element of all of these, but choose a structure for the relationship that does not violate the bonds of marriage or his structure of monogamy. It is who the person is that causes these elements to exist and it is the structure of the relationship that gives us the framework of how to interact.

quote:

I just wanted to make sure that I understood you completely. What I am reading here is that you will obey any extremely dominant male if you are engaging in an intimate relationship and the structure he lives under is unimportant to the intimate relationship. It remains the same regardless of that structure.


This is accurate, which is why I was so very careful about who I entered an intimate relationship with. There were quite a few character strengths that he had to possess for me to open myself up to a relationship with him.

quote:

You have clarified my confusion, which, as I expected was a difference in definition of the term conventional.


My pleasure; I am happy that I could clear things up. This thread has been quite pleasurable for me because it has given me the opportunity to re-examine some old thoughts and ideas and ensure that they still hold true who I am today.

Knight's kyra




ownedgirlie -> RE: Trust and Faith (3/9/2006 8:19:47 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: sskitten

By the way..... in saying "after slogging through 7 pages" I certainly meant no disrespect to all of you who have contributed so much food for thought. Your posts have helped me think more carefully and clearly about what trust and faith mean to me, and I thank you.

I only said "slogging" because it's a lot to read in one sitting (though I did read the first few pages a few days ago) and because of the dead horse in the middle... I was trying to glean the ideas, and the lengthy discussion of the styles of arriving at or sharing the ideas was threatening to overwhelm the idea-sharing itself... but it's also fun to get a sense of your personalities and to follow some of you from thread to thread... I am a silent reader of many of your posts on other threads... thank you for all your sharing. I am learning and growing and I've become quite addicted to these boards since taking my first peek not so many days ago!

Kitten



No disrespect taken by this one. Hope the horse didn't smell too much. We tried to bury it pretty deep ;)




ExistentialSteel -> RE: Trust and Faith (3/11/2006 5:06:45 PM)

Allow me to put the final shovel full on it and stamp it in since my compliment to your post seemed to have ruffled more than feathers.




scratchingpost -> RE: Trust and Faith (3/12/2006 1:54:51 AM)

trust to me means that i can rely and depend upon the person to always speak the truth whether i like it or not. i can trust they will always do what thtey feel is in my best interest and the best interest of the relationship...trust is earned by experience with that person

faith is a belief system. for example..im not 100% sure that they WILL know what is best for me but i do know they will do what they feel lis best for me....




catize -> RE: Trust and Faith (3/12/2006 6:24:41 AM)

I expect DG (my Dom) to trust that I have enough intelligence and self-preservation to remove myself from a burning building without waiting for his permsission.
Trust is a two-way street.




LATEXBABY64 -> RE: Trust and Faith (3/12/2006 7:42:34 AM)

some people make things so difficult and clouded that you never know what is correct so i live by simple black n white rules
lifes less complex more honest i love honest but there tends to be more dishonesty in lifestyle because of the sexual driven nature
its like a drug addiction people will lie to get what they want so i just cut those people out of my life it takes a strong person to know right from wrong and stand up for it also to not stand for it when your in it. less we are not tolerate of liars and minuplators the better our lifestyle will be but its all up to you

:)




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 6 [7]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125