RE: Fuck this, I am gonna name names right here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

RE: Fuck this, I am gonna name names right here!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

proudsub -> RE: Fuck this, I am gonna name names right here!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (3/2/2006 10:17:56 PM)
quote: You are the bomb, proud..... XO, Ron (you have pulled the shit outta some threads for me pal) What can i say, i love to serve.[;)]

mnottertail -> RE: See the new feature........it is great!!!! (3/2/2006 10:22:05 PM)
The Prisoner... Patrick McGoohan Be seeing you............ LOL

angelic -> RE: See the new feature........it is great!!!! (3/2/2006 11:26:23 PM)
damnit.. yes.. if You are going to quote me at least give me the credit!!! ok thanks, owned... now i'm wondering what place is what!... crap... who is on first???

RavenMuse -> RE: Fuck this, I am gonna name names right here!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (3/3/2006 4:42:43 AM)
Ron dear boy. I'm still not sure what you've been smoking but perhaps you might want to stick to something a little less strong. You're even more incoherent than usual[:D]

MHOO314 -> RE: Fuck this, I am gonna name names right here!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (3/3/2006 5:31:20 AM)
OOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHH that deelibob! how neat, but I really like to get the thoughts of the current posting group as experience and dynamics tend to change, however, I did use it last night to search out someone with experience in something too intimate to post--[8\|] For those still wandering in the darkness--at the top left of the posting screen there are now 2 quick search options---View related threads ( in this forum l an all forums)

candystripper -> RE: Fuck this, I am gonna name names right here!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (3/3/2006 5:44:04 AM)
Ron, darling, the title and the subject do not match. i expected some major set-to, and all i get is a new feature? But i must admit, now i have to do a bit of research to determine if what i'm about to post is original. Big Sigh. i wonder now, do we bump old threads where they are still relevant? i don't mean "bump" in a bad way; i guess i mean "revive'. Be funny to see how members' opinions have changed since they arrived, as i know mine have. Education is a dangeous thing. candystripper

LuckyAlbatross -> RE: Fuck this, I am gonna name names right here!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (3/3/2006 5:46:35 AM)
SHINY!!!!

fyreredsub -> RE: See the new feature........it is great!!!! (3/3/2006 5:52:19 AM)
i still read your posts even when they dont make sense---btw i saw a commercial for ale last night that reminded me of you and Master IB[8D] smiles quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: ORIGINAL: ownedgirlie and i'm more than a little miffed that You got to put f* in this thread and my comment last week about incen* got blipped out! Because of this little pecaddillo, a Moderator is checking me out right now... incenfucku is not a polite word.........everyone agrees to F* but you got 5 stars, now c'mon guys Dr. Phil can't do the duty that long point is \|... Do you even have an idea how many times I have written a passionate post and a nice, calm cogent thought it was and it never saw the light of day? In my experience the mods have been great to me......but look......they are human too......... Ok, you with the five ***** can be a mod.......try and deal with me everyday........... You will see why the number ain't pretty You are number 6, I am the new number two, who is number 1? LOL, I couldn't help it........ Ron Melby

MHOO314 -> RE: Fuck this, I am gonna name names right here!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (3/3/2006 6:47:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: candystripper But i must admit, now i have to do a bit of research to determine if what i'm about to post is original. Big Sigh. i wonder now, do we bump old threads where they are still relevant? i don't mean "bump" in a bad way; i guess i mean "revive'. Be funny to see how members' opinions have changed since they arrived, as i know mine have. Education is a dangeous thing. candystripper Interesting question candy--in My newest work project I am heavily involved in the content development and structure for a "news and feature" site that is considered external to our company--the thoughts about relevancy are very different "out there"--consumers of news like to revive subjects for a variety of reasons--it is still or is newly relevant to their lives--or they want to see what the new "mix" of consumers thinks and feels--(which is why I get irritated here at times when someone asks a question and they get past URL's for a response)---but there is always a search feature for research, review of past thoughts or to find a contributor who is an expert in an area for a direct dialogue. So I say bring it, who cares if we talked about it before.

yourMissTress -> RE: Fuck this, I am gonna name names right here!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (3/3/2006 7:01:02 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MHOO314 quote: ORIGINAL: candystripper But i must admit, now i have to do a bit of research to determine if what i'm about to post is original. Big Sigh. i wonder now, do we bump old threads where they are still relevant? i don't mean "bump" in a bad way; i guess i mean "revive'. Be funny to see how members' opinions have changed since they arrived, as i know mine have. Education is a dangeous thing. candystripper Interesting question candy--in My newest work project I am heavily involved in the content development and structure for a "news and feature" site that is considered external to our company--the thoughts about relevancy are very different "out there"--consumers of news like to revive subjects for a variety of reasons--it is still or is newly relevant to their lives--or they want to see what the new "mix" of consumers thinks and feels--(which is why I get irritated here at times when someone asks a question and they get past URL's for a response)---but there is always a search feature for research, review of past thoughts or to find a contributor who is an expert in an area for a direct dialogue. So I say bring it, who cares if we talked about it before. Another take on this thought is that there is an ever evolving group of posters here. Yes, there are some of you that have been posting since the site began. But I think it's nice to have both options on getting others thoughts. Besides that, have you ever seen a thread started about oh say..."Rubberbands" that ends up being a thread about "The trauma of the LLama"?

candystripper -> RE: See the new feature........it is great!!!! (3/3/2006 7:27:10 AM)
Ron is a mod? candystripper

yourMissTress -> RE: See the new feature........it is great!!!! (3/3/2006 7:29:59 AM)
quote: Ron is a mod? Hmmmm? surely not...I think he's saying "here, be a mod and have to deal with me!" to illustrate what a good job the mods do on this site.

candystripper -> RE: See the new feature........it is great!!!! (3/3/2006 7:38:02 AM)
Not that Ron wouldn't be a great mod.......... candystripper

ProtagonistLily -> RE: Fuck this, I am gonna name names right here!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (3/3/2006 12:13:19 PM)
Funny, I know exactly what he's saying ~shrugs~ Kassie

proudsub -> RE: Fuck this, I am gonna name names right here!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (3/3/2006 12:19:04 PM)
quote: Another take on this thought is that there is an ever evolving group of posters here. Yes, there are some of you that have been posting since the site began. But I think it's nice to have both options on getting others thoughts. Reviving an old thread doesn't prevent new insights on a topic. Some of the old threads have some excellent posts that the OP of a new thread may enjoy reading.[:)]

yourMissTress -> RE: Fuck this, I am gonna name names right here!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (3/3/2006 12:30:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: proudsub quote: Another take on this thought is that there is an ever evolving group of posters here. Yes, there are some of you that have been posting since the site began. But I think it's nice to have both options on getting others thoughts. Reviving an old thread doesn't prevent new insights on a topic. Some of the old threads have some excellent posts that the OP of a new thread may enjoy reading.[:)] You misunderstand me, proudsub. What I meant was exactly what you said. It's nice to have both the old thread to read and the opportunity for new opinions to be voiced as well.

proudsub -> RE: Fuck this, I am gonna name names right here!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (3/3/2006 1:23:47 PM)
quote: You misunderstand me, proudsub. What I meant was exactly what you said. It's nice to have both the old thread to read and the opportunity for new opinions to be voiced as well. Glad we agree.[:)]

bear372217355 -> RE: Fuck this, I am gonna name names right here!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (3/3/2006 2:35:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OscarHargraves Was there a point to this? If so, I sure missed it. Mnottertail you usually make good sense and post well but this one was out in left field buddy. Are you on the same meds as him, or thinking of someone else, or smoking the same killer weed as he is, or are you his sock puppet????

tendergirl -> RE: See the new feature........it is great!!!! (3/3/2006 3:05:38 PM)
Have I had too much wine again? I don't get this thread yet! (thinks too much breath play has rotted my brain cells) confused tendergirl

proudsub -> RE: See the new feature........it is great!!!! (3/3/2006 3:24:34 PM)
quote: Have I had too much wine again? I don't get this thread yet! CM has added an option to search automatically for old threads related to the one you are reading. Look in the upper left corner of this page where it says "view related threads". Hope that helps, now have another glass of wine.[:)]

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875