RE: Where is the economy? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


SeekingAZ -> RE: Where is the economy? (10/3/2009 4:27:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Ialdabaoth


quote:

ORIGINAL: SeekingAZ
Yup, Obama is a Cheney and Rumsfeld lackey. As soon as the architect called him on the bat phone he went right out and doubled the deficit as commanded in less than 100 days in office. Obama is part of the right wing conspiracy and you voted for him, haha :P


...huh?


Exactly !




InvisibleBlack -> RE: Where is the economy? (10/3/2009 4:47:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: gift4mistress
This article is saying that "business may return to usual." Or, that we may end up doing the same things again that lead to the economic crisis of 2008.

As it stands, where is the economy?



I will attempt to leave out all the political opinions and general partisanship and try and directly answer the OP. (I will also try not to write an essay. I may fail at this.)

The "great" mystery of the Great Depression was not the Crash of 1929, as most people seem to think. Crashes and panics happened regularly throughout the late 1800s and early 1900s. The mystery was why the economy never recovered from the Crash. Technically, the "crash" or the "recession" that started in 1929 ended in 1933. From that point on, the economy grew, so America was in a "growth" period. The problem was that the "growth" was so anemic that it was indistinguishable from "no change". Employment, capacity utilization, productivity, etc. did not return to "normal" levels until after World War II (which is commonly accepted as having reset the world economy and cured the Great Depression - although this has been contested) and the economy did not recover to its pre-Crash levels until about 1948. That's almost 20 years of no growth or jobless recovery or whatever spin you want to attach to it. THAT is what made the "Great Depression" such an anomaly.

This time around, the efforts of the Federal Reserve and the Department of Treasury basically consisted of pushing trillions of dollars into the banking system. This has managed to stabilize the financial community. I believe it has also had the effect of artificially inflating the stock market as all that money sloshing through the banking system has had to go somewhere and it appears to me that it's rolled into investments rather than filtering down to the communities, real businesses (by which I mean companies or concerns that actual make or produce something) or regular folks.

Currently, I see no improvement in the overall economy. Huge numbers of people are still unemployed, massive amounts of debt are still in the system, people are not rushing out to buy stuff (i.e. consumption is not up), and business people are not investing in new capacity, building new plants or expanding their concerns (i.e. creating jobs). I expect we'll start seeing a lot of mergers and acquisitions as, if you have a lot of cash on hand and your rivals' companies are trading at a discount price, buying them up looks like a pretty good idea - but M&A generally results in additional layoffs, additional plant closings, and reduction of capacity.

To boil it down, if you cut through the hype and the misleading statistics they throw around - this is it and it's going to stay like this. It's not coming back, unless something changes, and if another significant shock occurs - it's going to crash again.

[Edited for typos.]




Ialdabaoth -> RE: Where is the economy? (10/3/2009 5:01:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SeekingAZ
Yup, Obama is a Cheney and Rumsfeld lackey. As soon as the architect called him on the bat phone he went right out and doubled the deficit as commanded in less than 100 days in office. Obama is part of the right wing conspiracy and you voted for him, haha :P


Ok... so let me try this again:

This wouldn't be the first time that a Republican administration, knowing that they don't have a hope in hell of getting another Republican in office, deliberately tanks the economy just as they leave office, so that it will appear to the public that a Democrat has saddled them with a recession.




MrRodgers -> RE: Where is the economy? (10/3/2009 6:19:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: InvisibleBlack
quote:

ORIGINAL: gift4mistress
This article is saying that "business may return to usual." Or, that we may end up doing the same things again that lead to the economic crisis of 2008.

As it stands, where is the economy?

The mystery was why the economy never recovered from the Crash. Technically, the "crash" or the "recession" that started in 1929 ended in 1933. From that point on, the economy grew, so America was in a "growth" period. The problem was that the "growth" was so anemic that it was indistinguishable from "no change". Employment, capacity utilization, productivity, etc. did not return to "normal" levels until after World War II (which is commonly accepted as having reset the world economy and cured the Great Depression - although this has been contested) and the economy did not recover to its pre-Crash levels until about 1948. That's almost 20 years of no growth or jobless recovery or whatever spin you want to attach to it. THAT is what made the "Great Depression" such an anomaly.

This is incorrect. There was no mystery at all because between 1933 and  1938 GDP had set a record and unemployment had been cut in half from it's post 1933 high of 16% down to 8%. So the economy had by then with the exception of joblessness, already far surpassed 'normal' levels.

By 1940 when work started on building up our Navy, the depression/recession was over.




MrRodgers -> RE: Where is the economy? (10/3/2009 6:32:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ialdabaoth

quote:

ORIGINAL: SeekingAZ
Yup, Obama is a Cheney and Rumsfeld lackey. As soon as the architect called him on the bat phone he went right out and doubled the deficit as commanded in less than 100 days in office. Obama is part of the right wing conspiracy and you voted for him, haha :P

Ok... so let me try this again:

This wouldn't be the first time that a Republican administration, knowing that they don't have a hope in hell of getting another Republican in office, deliberately tanks the economy just as they leave office, so that it will appear to the public that a Democrat has saddled them with a recession.

Oh no they wouldn't do a thing like that would they ? Better that we are satisfied that 60 ton Boeing airliners can vaporize on impact with a building or the ground faster than wall street can vaporize our money.




blacksword404 -> RE: Where is the economy? (10/3/2009 7:32:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

What...what, did we expect anything different from these bonus bitches ?

This is c a p i t a l i s m  kinkroids and they are here to make some fucking money...nothing else matters.

Why does anyone think we don't get a public health care option ?

What do you suppose it is that we have 'single-payer' 'govt. run'  health insurance for banks and pensions and investors ?

Why are we throwing $20 billion at about 700,000 'eligible' farmers.

It's because 'we' are here for some fucking money and pretty much don't give a damn how we go about getting it...Capiche ?

OH and THE capitalist...he doesn't give a damn about jobs...what are 'jobs.' He doesn't create any jobs but a few menial positions to cover his ass...so what the fuck.

The bankers, corporatist and investors are ALWAYS trying to get rid of 'jobs' here, doesn't create any here...and only moves what he has to some fascists, creating the modern slave labor.



La capisco. That is where the government is supposed to do it's job and keep the leash on them. Which they could do if they got big businesses dick out of their mouth.

Corporations are good at making money. Period. The government's job is to make sure they make this money within the framework and guidelines they put forth. Problem comes in when they get paid by these companies to not do their job.




MarsBonfire -> RE: Where is the economy? (10/3/2009 8:03:35 PM)

Uncomfortably, I have to agree with Kirata on this one. Banks are still dealing in derivatives, we still have a butt load of toxic home loans out there just waiting to go bad, and the execs are still acting like they are teens in a whorehouse with Dad's credit card. Government regulation needs to be put back in place, and these schmucks need to be put on a choke chain.

There are still plenty of people out there buying cars, but they aren't buying the American brands. Toyota, Honda, and Hundai (built in America) are all perking along just fine, thanks. Detroit should have paid more attention to the desires of the market, instead of pushing huge gas guzzlers. (Seems like the speech in "Tucker: A Man and His Dream" was pretty dead on.)




Musicmystery -> RE: Where is the economy? (10/3/2009 8:54:12 PM)

quote:

Detroit should have paid more attention to the desires of the market, instead of pushing huge gas guzzlers.


Yeah....40 years ago.....




Musicmystery -> RE: Where is the economy? (10/3/2009 8:59:12 PM)

quote:

"Investors" as in investing in a business, a new idea, a building project; those investments are what drive the economy.


Again, bullshit.

Absolutely new businesses are opening, old businesses are expanding. People still have wants and needs. Smart people supply those good and services.

Hell, a quick Google search will turn up hundreds.




InvisibleBlack -> RE: Where is the economy? (10/3/2009 9:38:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: InvisibleBlack
quote:

ORIGINAL: gift4mistress
This article is saying that "business may return to usual." Or, that we may end up doing the same things again that lead to the economic crisis of 2008.

As it stands, where is the economy?

The mystery was why the economy never recovered from the Crash. Technically, the "crash" or the "recession" that started in 1929 ended in 1933. From that point on, the economy grew, so America was in a "growth" period. The problem was that the "growth" was so anemic that it was indistinguishable from "no change". Employment, capacity utilization, productivity, etc. did not return to "normal" levels until after World War II (which is commonly accepted as having reset the world economy and cured the Great Depression - although this has been contested) and the economy did not recover to its pre-Crash levels until about 1948. That's almost 20 years of no growth or jobless recovery or whatever spin you want to attach to it. THAT is what made the "Great Depression" such an anomaly.

This is incorrect. There was no mystery at all because between 1933 and  1938 GDP had set a record and unemployment had been cut in half from it's post 1933 high of 16% down to 8%. So the economy had by then with the exception of joblessness, already far surpassed 'normal' levels.

By 1940 when work started on building up our Navy, the depression/recession was over.



The statistics are somewhat misleading. Depending on the year you pick to normalize your GDP growth to real dollars you can get results ranging from recovery to 1929 levels from 1937 to 1940 (which was the start of the big run-up to the war - Roosevelt initiated a draft in 1940 which obviously vastly increases employment and hence GDP).

However, GDP isn't a very valid statistic to track in order to determine whether or not the economy has recovered, since GDP includes government expenditures. Obviously as the Federal government takes on debt and spends money, the GDP number will increase - whether or not those expenditures actually translate to something that is adding value to the economy or simply paying someone to dig a ditch in the morning and then fill it in the afternoon, hence adding no real value.

When the Roosevelt administration attempted to unwind their spending programs and stop the bulk of the WPA and New Deal employment programs in late 1936 and early 1937, the economy immediately began to slump - there was no increase in private sector production or industry and before things collapsed too far, Roosevelt started up the programs again. The economy had not recovered, it was simply on government life support and the administration was unable to figure out how to take it off.

As Henry Morgenthau, the Secretary of the Treasury, said to the House Ways & Means Committee in May of 1939:

"We are spending more money than we have ever spent before and it does not work. I want to see this country prosperous. I want to see people get a job. I want to see people get enough to eat. We have never made good on our promises. I say after eight years of this Administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started and an enormous debt to boot."

By running a deficit and pushing money directly into consumers hands (either through work programs such as the WPA or simply handing them money through various programs) they were able to keep the economy floating along - but they were never able to trigger a recovery of the economic base. When they tried to end these programs, things slumped again. I don't fault the Roosevelt administration for its efforts - Roosevelt tried a great variety of things during his years in office, and if a program failed or made things worse he dropped it and tried something else - but he was never able to get the American economy back on track.

I'm not arguing that the government can't maintain a hugely high GDP by spending massive amounts of money and taking on massive amounts of debt - you'll notice I didn't refer to GDP in my original post - likewise, the government could (in theory) drive unemployment to zero by simply hiring everyone in the country. Roosevelt's New Deal (just like Hoover's "non-interference" policy) was unable to trigger a recovery in the business sector - which is why unemployment remained high and capacity utilization remained low.

I don't want to hijack the thread into an economics discussion, feel free to PM if you want to discuss statistics and economteric models - but my underlying point is this - I do not believe that taking on debt to push trillions of dollars into the banking sector is going to result in a boom in the rest of the economy (what's referred to now as "Main Street"). The stock market going up does not necessarily mean that companies are expanding, re-opening old sites or building new ones, it just means that a lot of investors are putting their money into stocks.

Right now, it looks like we are able to maintain the status quo - which is about 10% unemployment and 68% capacity utilization. I don't see any signs of this changing and if we have some major shock - such as the commerical real estate industry collapsing or an oil crunch - I expect things to turn down again.




gift4mistress -> RE: Where is the economy? (10/3/2009 10:38:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

"Investors" as in investing in a business, a new idea, a building project; those investments are what drive the economy.


Again, bullshit.

Absolutely new businesses are opening, old businesses are expanding. People still have wants and needs. Smart people supply those good and services.

Hell, a quick Google search will turn up hundreds.


Would you say that investments are at where they once were before the economic recession? If I recall correctly, one of my links in my op stated that most businesses aren't hiring because they are "unsure how sustainable the current economy is." In theory, this same rule would probably apply to businesses investing on projects. If you aren't sure about the economy, why would you want to invest and take such a huge risk that may result in no return?  If you were to invest in something during an economic recession or during stagnation and receive no return; I would assume that it would be almost impossible or at-least very difficult to retain what you just lost from that investment.




ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: Where is the economy? (10/3/2009 10:39:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: InvisibleBlack

I don't want to hijack the thread into an economics discussion, feel free to PM if you want to discuss statistics and economteric models...


You're not hijacking; that's the subject of the thread! Personally, I vote for you posting a lot more of what you're saying here. It's always been pretty obvious that you know a lot more about economics than most of the rest of us, and you communicate it very well. Plus, I almost always agree with you; I just can't say it as well as you can. So for all those reasons and more, I say post away!




tazzygirl -> RE: Where is the economy? (10/3/2009 10:44:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: InvisibleBlack

I don't want to hijack the thread into an economics discussion, feel free to PM if you want to discuss statistics and economteric models...


You're not hijacking; that's the subject of the thread! Personally, I vote for you posting a lot more of what you're saying here. It's always been pretty obvious that you know a lot more about economics than most of the rest of us, and you communicate it very well. Plus, I almost always agree with you; I just can't say it as well as you can. So for all those reasons and more, I say post away!




[sm=agree.gif]





Fellow -> RE: Where is the economy? (10/4/2009 1:12:44 AM)

quote:

As it stands, where is the economy?


In the toilet. There is no recovery only a flattering out mostly caused by the stimulus money and credit injections. The president's options dealing with the economy are rather limited. He does not have real power to undertake major reforms (health care proposal shows it clearly). He has to come out with the idea how to manufacture an another bubble to survive until the re-election campaign.




SeekingAZ -> RE: Where is the economy? (10/4/2009 2:31:09 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ialdabaoth

quote:

ORIGINAL: SeekingAZ
Yup, Obama is a Cheney and Rumsfeld lackey. As soon as the architect called him on the bat phone he went right out and doubled the deficit as commanded in less than 100 days in office. Obama is part of the right wing conspiracy and you voted for him, haha :P

Ok... so let me try this again:

This wouldn't be the first time that a Republican administration, knowing that they don't have a hope in hell of getting another Republican in office, deliberately tanks the economy just as they leave office, so that it will appear to the public that a Democrat has saddled them with a recession.

Oh no they wouldn't do a thing like that would they ? Better that we are satisfied that 60 ton Boeing airliners can vaporize on impact with a building or the ground faster than wall street can vaporize our money.



Another person that failed high school physics or didn't have the opportunity or ambition to take the class. Do yourself a favor and do some research and figure out what the kinetic energy is of a one pound object moving at 450 to 500 knots. Multiply it by the weight of a 737 carrying enough fuel to fly nonstop from boston to the west coast. Any other building other than the WTC probably would of fallen on impact outside it's footprint killing tens of thousands more on the ground in Manhattan. And oh btw, the wtc exterior structure was primarily steel a 737's primary structural component is it's aluminium skin. If that sounds stupid to you, look up semi-monocoque construction on wikipedia or some other source. If you still don't understand, the average terminal velocity of a human body in free fall is a meager 120-180 mph depending on how fat you are and what you're wearing. Declare an experiment and make a base jump without a parachute, during your resultant out of body experience make an estimate of how much of your insides are now outside and make contact with that talk radio psychic guy that talks to dead people to let us know if you still think a steel column structure can't turn aluminum into tiny little pieces when you smack them together at better than 0.8 mach. If you think that's too harsh too fucking bad dozens of people on 9/11/2001 chose to participate in that exact same experiment to avoid being burned to death. People whose memory shouldn't be defiled by whack job "9/11 was an inside job" conspiracy theorists.

When the islamo-fascists realize that guns are banned at our schools which makes them free fire zones with multitudes of easy targets and they act on it, if there's justice in this world, maybe someone from your family will be among the victims. Then when some idiot comes along before the blood stains have had a chance to dry and claims that some American or Israeli was really behind the attacks or that it's impossibility of physics for a bullet to pass through 2 layers of drywall and still be able to kill a child, maybe, just maybe, the useless organ between your ears might just gain some insight into the pain your own past statements convey.




Ialdabaoth -> RE: Where is the economy? (10/4/2009 2:44:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SeekingAZ
When the islamo-fascists realize that guns are banned at our schools which makes them free fire zones with multitudes of easy targets and they act on it, if there's justice in this world, maybe someone from your family will be among the victims. Then when some idiot comes along before the blood stains have had a chance to dry and claims that some American or Israeli was really behind the attacks or that it's impossibility of physics for a bullet to pass through 2 layers of drywall and still be able to kill a child, maybe, just maybe, the useless organ between your ears might just gain some insight into the pain your own past statements convey.


I was with you up until here. Wishing for people's children to die to teach them a lesson is poor sport.




SeekingAZ -> RE: Where is the economy? (10/4/2009 3:28:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Ialdabaoth


quote:

ORIGINAL: SeekingAZ
When the islamo-fascists realize that guns are banned at our schools which makes them free fire zones with multitudes of easy targets and they act on it, if there's justice in this world, maybe someone from your family will be among the victims. Then when some idiot comes along before the blood stains have had a chance to dry and claims that some American or Israeli was really behind the attacks or that it's impossibility of physics for a bullet to pass through 2 layers of drywall and still be able to kill a child, maybe, just maybe, the useless organ between your ears might just gain some insight into the pain your own past statements convey.


I was with you up until here. Wishing for people's children to die to teach them a lesson is poor sport.


I have no hope for children to die. Only that that the jackasses that blindly search for a reason *any* reason to politicize that attack and minimize this ongoing war end up effected by the next, now inevitable, attack and get new understanding about their conspiracy bullshit. And yes i do believe it'll be at a school (most likely several at the same time) or something like a mall food court. An attack that only requires a few weapons (assuming the attacker is willing to die during the attack) and where misguided gun restrictions will minimize citizen's ability to resist is exactly the type of thing this enemy would find attractive. This kind of attack wouldn't require much in planning and would not raise suspicions like walking into a beauty supply store and attempting to buy a few dozen gallons of hydrogen peroxide and acetone recently caused.

Fortunately for us terrorist cells in the United States seem to be over-populated with idiots at this time. So we have idiots setting terrorism policy and idiots trying to get around them. It's been an uncomfortable stalemate lately.

Oh and i'm really fucking tired of people that point out that the current administration's policies increase the likely hood of another attack on our soil occuring being accused of "hoping" it happens. I don't "hope" it'll happen I'm resigned to it happening. It takes an unmitigated douche bag like Bill Clinton to say shit like "I never had an event like 9/11 to define my Presidency". He seems to be the last to know his only lasting Presidential legacy is going to be a cum stain on a blue dress.





Mercnbeth -> RE: Where is the economy? (10/4/2009 7:02:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
quote:

"Investors" as in investing in a business, a new idea, a building project; those investments are what drive the economy.

Again, bullshit.
Absolutely new businesses are opening, old businesses are expanding. People still have wants and needs. Smart people supply those good and services.
Hell, a quick Google search will turn up hundreds.


Been to Vegas lately? There are 25 pads where there should have been hotels. Unlike the small business; these are high paying good jobs that pay benefits and produce revenue for the government. They don't exist because of subsidies which take it away. They didn't employ minimum wage workers and offered no benefits.

Hundreds? Where's one large enough to take on a town worth of people where Saturn will be closed. Where's one, or add up all your "hundreds" taking on the 12% unemployed in CA?

You need to be an Administration apologist and rationalizer to use start up businesses as an indicator of productive "investment". There are 1000's of new businesses started every day in the US. My guess is there would be more now than ever. The line at the department of corporations is the next one you stand in after signing up for unemployment.




Musicmystery -> RE: Where is the economy? (10/4/2009 8:07:46 AM)

Look, stick your head wherever you want it.

You made the sweeping claim that no one is investing. That's never true. Yup, some businesses are closing. That's always true too, even in bull markets.

The Administration is largely irrelevant--this one and past ones. They just don't have that kind of economic power. Two-thirds of GDP is consumers.

If you ever tire of your "anecdote as news" approach, look at economic indicators. Production is up. Messes remain, sure--they were messes that were going to blow up sooner or later, built on sandy foundations. Employment will follow...but slowly, as it often does after a recession. Mortgage problems will persist for a bit, because the structural problems don't vanish with a market upturn. These are transactions that never should have happened.

New business comes from people who can identify and capitalize on wants and needs. We still have wants and needs--and we still have people who understand that starting and running a business doesn't mean following the trends. And businesses that make poor decisions--like the U.S. automakers did--will face hard times. Saturn is an excellent example--great concept, great product, but G.M. just sat around and looked at it while their competitors whizzed on by.

Of course, every schmoe who's been hired as a manager mistakenly thinks he's a skilled entrepreneur, when reality is he's a hired hand carrying out someone else's vision--but that's another story. Ego will always trump reality in those cases.

So make your proclamations. While you're doing that, others are making money--the old fashioned way, by producing goods and services better and more effectively than their competitors, by introducing new products that better serve. Turning profits in good times and bad, using slow times to build for better times.

Now, if you want to make the claim that tight credit is dampening investment, fine. I'm not so sure that's bad in the long run (now that we're past banks just not lending at all), as a lot of the past credit went to questionable ventures. You use Vegas as an example--gaming is very recession prone, as it doesn't "produce" in a meaningful sense, and people stay home when money's tight. The entertainment isn't enough to sustain the loss from gaming revenue, and the market is already overstaturated--some long established casinos were struggling before the economy slowed. So if a bunch of pads are sitting around undeveloped, frankly, it's just that lenders are making smarter decisions, and/or developers are realizing Vegas doesn't need several new casinos.

We also have an abysmal savings rate in the U.S. If tougher times help change that, sure, consumption will drop in the short run, but investment will be there for the long term--and people won't be in dire straits next time unemployment benefits end.

We have the same assets and value we had before the economy tanked. Smart people will figure out how to add value and access, helping their customers and earning profit for themselves. The rest will whine that no one gives them a break.





Musicmystery -> RE: Where is the economy? (10/4/2009 9:00:11 AM)

quote:

He seems to be the last to know his only lasting Presidential legacy is going to be a cum stain on a blue dress.


And the longest peacetime economic expansion in U.S. history.

Seems a few folk here have thoughts on NAFTA too. Must have had some impact.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875