RE: Move Over Larry Craig

RE: Move Over Larry Craig (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

HatesParisHilton -> RE: Move Over Larry Craig (10/5/2009 9:21:23 PM)
I am SO going to hire Katja Kassin to put on te Palin Glasses for this movie.

slvemike4u -> RE: Move Over Larry Craig (10/5/2009 10:50:38 PM)
Gives a whole new meaning to 'I'll see both attorneys in my chambers"....doesn't it?

HatesParisHilton -> RE: Move Over Larry Craig (10/5/2009 10:56:14 PM)
BOTH chambers, bwahhh hawww hawww!

rikigrl -> RE: Move Over Larry Craig (10/6/2009 4:12:45 AM)
i want a female judge to spank me (and not Judge Judy, she's such a b*tch)...oh to lay over those flowing robes once again, skirt up, panties down, it takes me back to Catholic school....oops, said too much, said too much.

thishereboi -> RE: Move Over Larry Craig (10/6/2009 4:29:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SpinnerofTales ~FR~ There has been a transcript leaked of this judge being spoken to by his legal advisors: JUDGE: What's wrong with being lenient? LAWYER: Nothing..but you're supposed to be giving them "A slap on the wrist" Well, he got the slap part right...one outta two ain't bad.

SpinnerofTales -> RE: Move Over Larry Craig (10/6/2009 5:48:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi Well, he got the slap part right...one outta two ain't bad. I guess when he said he was going to get to the bottom of criminal activity, he meant it.

UncleNasty -> RE: Move Over Larry Craig (10/6/2009 8:51:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SpinnerofTales ~FR~ I think we are missing the constitutional issue here. The constitution forbids the imposition of cruel and unusual punishment. Spankings for felony convictions is not necessarily cruel...but it sure is unusual. Let's get the Supreme Court fired up! Not exactly as these were not officially sanctioned punishments. Consider this statement: The government cannot abuse or deny your civil rights. The reason for this is that when and if your rights are abused or denied it is not the government that is doing such. It is instead the individual/s that are doing such. They do such under the illusion of an official capacity that no longer exists. In addition to powers and abilities "government" also has limits and disabilities. When governmental officials step outside of their official powers they are no longer acting in an official capacity. It becomes an individual capacity. It is easy to be confused. Violations of this sort are commonly referred to as "color of law violations" and they occur more frequently than most people know. A google search under that term, color of law, will turn up the relevant sections of the United States Code. What I find most disturbing in the article is this: "The oldest incident in the charges dates to 1999, his first year as a circuit judge. The first public claim against Thomas surfaced in lawsuits filed by an inmate in 2001 in Mobile circuit court and in federal court that claimed the judge offered to help him with his case in return for sex. Both lawsuits were dismissed, and Thomas' reputation remained unblemished." I don't assume that the man is guilty. Our system is supposed to work with a presumption of innocence. If he is guilty the amount of cover up and complicity is quite staggering. How many people would it require to look the other way and to fail in the execution of their official duties? Such may be the status of our judiciary. Uncle Nasty

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125