RE: An Inquiry (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity



Message

zephyroftheNorth -> RE: An Inquiry (10/16/2009 6:14:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LanceHughes

OP: I would be proud to receive my first NZ points for writing (as opposed to those that you've kindly given me for computing.)  I apply for said points by drawing your attention to:

http://www.collarchat.com/m_2852755/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#2854591


suckup



Wolf2Bear -> RE: An Inquiry (10/16/2009 6:17:25 PM)

*snort*




zephyroftheNorth -> RE: An Inquiry (10/16/2009 6:21:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wolf2Bear

*snort*




*grins*



LanceHughes -> RE: An Inquiry (10/16/2009 7:39:22 PM)

Well,

I can't get the points awarded on this string (see above)
and
I can't see NZ looking at every post on every thread to find writing worthy of his pee-pee, er....um, .... HIS Precious Points
and
He suggested above that I was a potential recipiant due to some posts that he had read previously
AND
I'm damn! proud of what I wrote (inc. the post -by me- which immeadiately follows.)

WAit, just one second.....you think calling a gay a "suck-up" is a bad thing? LOL!



zephyroftheNorth -> RE: An Inquiry (10/16/2009 7:42:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LanceHughes

Well,

I can't get the points awarded on this string (see above)
and
I can't see NZ looking at every post on every thread to find writing worthy of his pee-pee, er....um, .... HIS Precious Points
and
He suggested above that I was a potential recipiant due to some posts that he had read previously
AND
I'm damn! proud of what I wrote (inc. the post -by me- which immeadiately follows.)

WAit, just one second.....you think calling a gay a "suck-up" is a bad thing? LOL!


Did I SAY it was a bad thing *grins*



LanceHughes -> RE: An Inquiry (10/16/2009 7:44:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

quote:

ORIGINAL: LanceHughes

Well,

I can't get the points awarded on this string (see above)
and
I can't see NZ looking at every post on every thread to find writing worthy of his pee-pee, er....um, .... HIS Precious Points
and
He suggested above that I was a potential recipiant due to some posts that he had read previously
AND
I'm damn! proud of what I wrote (inc. the post -by me- which immeadiately follows.)

WAit, just one second.....you think calling a gay a "suck-up" is a bad thing? LOL!


Did I SAY it was a bad thing *grins*



No, you didn't... that's why I asked. <Grins> back from the one who gave you your 1st anagram, remember?



zephyroftheNorth -> RE: An Inquiry (10/16/2009 7:47:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LanceHughes

quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

quote:

ORIGINAL: LanceHughes

Well,

I can't get the points awarded on this string (see above)
and
I can't see NZ looking at every post on every thread to find writing worthy of his pee-pee, er....um, .... HIS Precious Points
and
He suggested above that I was a potential recipiant due to some posts that he had read previously
AND
I'm damn! proud of what I wrote (inc. the post -by me- which immeadiately follows.)

WAit, just one second.....you think calling a gay a "suck-up" is a bad thing? LOL!


Did I SAY it was a bad thing *grins*



No, you didn't... that's why I asked. <Grins> back from the one who gave you your 1st anagram, remember?


Yes I do and I will always look back fondly on that day [sm=cute.gif]



Wolf2Bear -> RE: An Inquiry (10/16/2009 8:11:06 PM)

Yanno zephyr...that sounds a tad bit kinky!



zephyroftheNorth -> RE: An Inquiry (10/16/2009 8:15:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wolf2Bear

Yanno zephyr...that sounds a tad bit kinky!


Ya think Bear? *whispers* Look under my name, I have to live up to my reputation



Wolf2Bear -> RE: An Inquiry (10/16/2009 8:17:54 PM)

*snorts*

Rather get back to the sucking  hahahahaha



afterforever -> RE: An Inquiry (10/18/2009 9:18:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Ialdabaoth

Hrm. Well, can you touch your feet to your shoulders when doing a backbend?


Nope, I'm about two inches off, I checked.



zephyroftheNorth -> RE: An Inquiry (10/18/2009 9:51:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wolf2Bear

*snorts*

Rather get back to the sucking  hahahahaha



Okay....Bear meet Lance, Lance meet Bear. My work here is done...



NihilusZero -> RE: An Inquiry (10/18/2009 11:40:09 AM)

lol

You guys rock. [:D]

I'll need to create a loophole for myself. For anyone who posts on this page (9) of the thread (and only this page), I'll award 10 points (if they already have a point total) or 15 points (if they have no points thus far). This only applies once per poster.

In a good mood today, despite having to get ready for work in about an hour.

Edit: I figured instead of posting the list in a separate post and erasing one additional slot on this page, I'll just add the updated list to this post:


OFFICIAL NZ POINT BALANCE LIST
As of 10/18/09 - 2:50pm EDT

Username           Total Points   Current Balance

afterforever             15            15
allthatjaz               25            25
Asherdelampyr            20            20
barelynangel            170           170
BeIgnited                25            25
CalifChick               35            35           
CallaFirestormBW        210           190
candystripper            20            20
CaringandReal            10            10
CatdeMedici              25            25
catize                   20            20
cornflakegirl            10            10
daddysblondie            25            25
daddysprop247            40            40
Daddysredhead            10            10
Darcyandthedark         125           125
DarkSteven               10            10
DavanKael               170           170
DemonKia                110            80
DesFIP                   15            15
Elousia                  40            40
GreedyTop                50            50
HeavansKeeper            40            40
Ialdabaoth              375           375
Kana                     20            20
kttqnp                   15            15
kyraofMists              50            50
LadyPact                 20            20
LanceHughes              30            30
leadership527           220           220
Level                    30            30
LillyoftheVally          80            80
lovingpet                10            10
Malus                    50            50
Mercnbeth                50            50
mnottertail              10            10
Musicmystery             30            30
porcelaine               30            30
pyroaquatic              10            10
RedMagic1                10            10
Rhembein                 10            10
ShaharThorne             10            10
sravaka                  40            40
SteelofUtah              30            30
stella41b                60            60
sunshinemiss             15            15
Surrenderwithin          15            15
ThatDamnedPanda         100           100
Venatrix                 30            30
windchymes               20            20
Wolf2Bear                20            20
YoursMistress            40            40
zephyroftheNorth         20            20



DesFIP -> RE: An Inquiry (10/18/2009 11:46:04 AM)

Apparently I have no points NZ. Therefore, being a page 9 poster, I'll take a starter 15 please. Sounds like I ought to be buying a vowel for that.



kttqnp -> RE: An Inquiry (10/18/2009 12:14:13 PM)

Wait, I have no points AND no vowels. Hope I sneak in on page 9 for the gratuitous points.



Annabelle83 -> RE: An Inquiry (10/18/2009 8:23:05 PM)

Woot woot I am posting here!



ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: An Inquiry (10/18/2009 8:31:19 PM)

I know this is tangential, but it's been bugging me for days. Does anyone know why on the forum's main page, this thread is entitled "The Official NZ Points Thread - Prizes and Scores", but once you're in the thread, the title appears as "An Inquiry?" I've never seen that happen before, and I'm confused by this.

Edit: And in case anyone was thinking of saying it, yes - it was just as confusing yesterday as it is today. Being a year older has nothing to do with it.



DemonKia -> RE: The Official NZ Points Thread - Prizes and Scores (10/18/2009 9:38:32 PM)

Panda, above the text reply box (FR, quote, or reply) there should be another smaller text entry box with the name of the thread . . . . Click, highlight, change . . . . .

Edited to change thread name back . . . .

The Inquiry thing happened some pages back, & / or is ongoing, but it probably is confuzzling to keep it at variance with the original . .. .



ThatDamnedPanda -> RE: The Official NZ Points Thread - Prizes and Scores (10/18/2009 9:47:15 PM)

Kia, I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you just told me. I see the text box you're talking about, but I don't understand what you said.



Ialdabaoth -> RE: The Official NZ Points Thread - Prizes and Scores (10/18/2009 9:51:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

Kia, I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you just told me. I see the text box you're talking about, but I don't understand what you said.


It's a quirk of how the board software works.

A thread has a title, right? Actually, wrong. Each post has a title. Technically, the thread "inherits" the title of the first post in it - so when NZ posted this thread, he posted it as a single message, entitled "The Official NZ Points Thread - Prizes and Scores". Make sense so far?

So! everyone responds to that post, and their posts (by default) get the same title as the OP, but with "RE: " stuck to the end. So their posts have the title "RE: The Official NZ Points Thread - Prizes and Scores". When you see the thread listed, you see the first post's title, but when you click to reply, or you see a new post singled-out in the sidebar or top scroller, you see THAT post's title, which usually has the "RE: ".

Now, here's the trick: You can edit that entire post line. It won't change NZ's original post title (which is what the forum's "topic list" uses to display), but it WILL change YOUR post's title (which is what the top and side updaters use, and which is what your reply-thingy uses). And people who respond to YOUR post, will inherit YOUR title - with a "RE: " tacked on if there isn't one.

At some point, someone edited their post title from "RE: The Official NZ Points Thread - Prizes and Scores" to "An Inquiry", and then the response became "RE: An Inquiry" - even though the OP was titled "The Official NZ Points Thread - Prizes and Scores", and shows that in the forum topic list.

Explaining more in-depth would involve describing bits of computer code, databases, and all that. Is this a sufficient explanation?



Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.515625E-02