Andalusite
Posts: 2492
Joined: 1/25/2009 Status: offline
|
RIMAAM, lovingpet clarified that her friend *DID* say no multiple times, and that no sex was negotiated ahead of time. Yes, there's a line between having regrets the next day and rape, but that is blatantly not the case here. This isn't mediocre sex, she's not accusing him of rape because she didn't have an orgasm! quote:
ORIGINAL: kiwisub12 Why, when she was in charge, she chose not to physically intervene i don't know, and it really isn't germane to the topic, she said no, he chose not to obey. However, i do think this woman needs to re-examine her motives and methods for and of domming. She needs to know why she didn't enforce her no with a stern grasp on the balls or nipples. She can't put herself into a situation where she doesn't have control, or can't enforce control. And obviously she can't enforce control physically if a man wishes to press the point, but she should be very plain in the way she says no - verbally and physically. Are you *serious*!?! You really think that touching a man sexually (nipples and balls) is the way to stop a rape or sexual assault in progress? Perhaps she could have physically escalated, but at that point, it wasn't a BDSM scene any more. If she had become violent with him, he might well have returned it, and murdered or seriously injured her. Freezing in reaction to sexual assault and verbally saying no still means he raped her, even if she didn't try to fight with him. Loki, there aren't many false accusations of rape or sexual assault in the first place. Of the few who do recant, most do so because the perpetrator is someone they love and are involved with (this happens with unconsensual domestic violence as well), or because they can't face the publicity/media, the dissection of their sex life, having to face their rapist/be in the same room with him again. Most aren't lying when they claimed they were raped, but when they "took it back." Threatening to prosecute them might lead to more rape trials, and possibly more convictions, but I don't think it's helpful. While you might be technically correct that my previous Dominant could hypothetically be prosecuted for rape when I said no, we *clearly* negotiated a different safeword, and he was very sensitive to my body language. There's a huge difference between that and this situation, where she was supposedly the Dominant (so he has no excuse of "oh, I misunderstood her struggling and she didn't use the other safeword we negotiated"). Heck, there have been times when I was so sub-spacey that I couldn't say no, or red, or my own name, but the men I've been with have been with in those situations have been extra conscientious to be aware of my body language, and agreed that merely my freezing and going silent was a cue to back off and check in (since that is how I react to a hard hit that I'm struggling to process). lovingpet, back when I was looking, one "submissive" wanted to come over and do housecleaning/cooking. We hadn't even talked on the phone yet, much less met in person. I think we'd exchanged a total of 3 e-mails. He wanted to have our first meet *on my birthday*, coming to my home, strip naked, and cook for me. I turned him down, and said flat out that I felt unsafe having a stranger in my home, *especially* one who was naked. He claimed that I needed to go to Match.com instead of here, since obviously I'm vanilla, since I'm not dominant enough to be certain I would be able to physically control a man who was 6" taller and 100 pounds heavier, just because he *claimed* to be submissive! This whole attitude toward her reminds me pretty strongly of that incident. Some submissive men seem to expect the whole "women being vulnerable due to our size and strength" issue to go away based on their self-reported D/s dynamic. Apparently, some women feel that way, too.
< Message edited by Andalusite -- 10/18/2009 8:25:01 PM >
|