tsatske -> RE: The picture dilemma (10/12/2009 7:57:39 PM)
|
I can not understand why being upfront about what you are seeking is a bad thing. It doesn't matter if it is a turnoff to you that he doesn't like your religion- you were not a match before you got that far. Isn't it better to be upfront? I have a full body nude pic on my profile. If you don't like bigger women, you are not in for a surprise - it's there before you write me. I am mentally ill. I don't put that on my profile, but I am not closeted or shy about talking about it here, and, more to the point, I have a stone hard limit of the first coffee date for the ABSOLUTE latest I will tell someone that. I don't have sex when I am unowned. This is a deal breaker for many. I have known people on here to put 'weight watchers' on thier hard limits list. I don't see the point of argueing that. There are lots of men on here who absolutely have no interest in talking to someone who identifies as a slave instead of as sub. I have tried a few conversations, becuase, 1) this could easily be more a difference in language use than actual lifestyle issues, and 2) sounds like it would be an interesting conversation to have. What I have learned is most of these men know that identifiying as a slave is a deal breaker for them, and, as such, not only have no interest in me, but take carte blanche to be rude. I don't get pissy about it. I just go ahead and terminate the conversation, accept that an interesting sounding conversation is not going to happen with them, and know, we weren't a match anyway. We weren't a match because, they don't like women who identify as subs, and I don't like Doms who chose to be rude. I really don't care how many things about me are a deal breaker for many. I am not trying to find many - I am trying to find one. There are gazzillions of them, and one right one. Anything that filters makes the job of finding that one, easier. filters are a good thing.
|
|
|
|